|
|
No. if you dont mind then Can u plz provide me ur email so that i could send u exe and u would better able to find issue.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll happily do your work for you, if you'll agree to my daily rate. Minimum 1 day @ £475/day.
|
|
|
|
|
 which is not even my one month pay
|
|
|
|
|
In which case, why dont you do one or more of the following:
1) Improve error handling in your app so you can catch the exact error message. Post this to allow people to help you in the way forums are meant to be used.
2) Google for the no-doubt common problem of 32bit .net apps failing unexpectidly on 64bit OS's
3) Step through your code on a copy of a 64bit OS to see if you can debug the problem in the traditional way.
My response above was not a serious solicit for work, it was to point out to you that most of the people who answer questions here are professional programmers (which you may or may not be), but we generally don't give away our services for free. We are however, usually happy to assis where the questioner has put in the minimum level of effort to solve their own problem.
|
|
|
|
|
thankz. Actually client have just exe file not sourcecode and asked me to sortout this issue. some one suggested me corflags .NET utility so i m going to look over it.
|
|
|
|
|
If you only have the exe file and not the source code, then what good will it be if we find the problem? 
|
|
|
|
|
Typically, this is caused by an application being compiled to target "Any CPU". This means that the code will run as a 32-bit app on 32-bit Windows and as a 64-bit app on 64-bit Windows. The problem comes in when the app uses 32-bit only components and .DLL's. You cannot mix 32 and 64-bit code in the same process, so an app that works fine as 32-bit will fall on it's face when run as 64-bit using the exact same components.
The solution is to recompile the app to target x86 only, but you need the source code for that.
The other fix is to run it on 32-bit Windows only, be it in a virtual machine or rebuilding the customers machine to run 32-bit Windows instead, but customers tend to frown upon this.
|
|
|
|
|
You can make an "AnyCPU" .NET app to run in 32-bit mode without need to recompile it.
Look here
|
|
|
|
|
Nope - don't give out my email adress in a public forum.
|
|
|
|
|
For gods sake, is it asking too much to spell out words?
|
|
|
|
|
HI,
What information is seen when the details button on the Unhandled exception dialog is clicked. The exception type and a stack trace should be available even if the application was built in release mode with debug information set to none.
Ask your clients to
1) highlight the detailed information by dragging over it with the mouse
2) Press Ctrl-C to copy the highlighted text to the clipboard
3) Paste into Notepad
4) Send you the file.
Alan.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know if I'm on the right message board but I could at least give it a shot...
I'm testing with NUnit. The code itself has been written in Microsoft Visual Web Developer 2008 Express Edition. I need to debug a test. Therefore I have set a breakpoint to start step-by-step debugging at a certain point.
However, NUnit skips the breakpints and runs the test all the way throught at once. How can I make NUnit pause at the breakpoints so I can do some step-by-step debugging?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
I have an application which will be deployed by clickOnce,
I have a Service Project in the same project, I want that when Installing the Application via the URL the service should be installed in Client Computer, as the application is avilable both Online and Offline.
any ideas, Like is it Possible to deploy the Application and Install the service via Click Once Deployment?
Abdul Rahaman Hamidy
Database Developer
Kabul, Afghanistan
|
|
|
|
|
Pls i want to access the private methods and events of a MDIChild Form from its parent Form and execute them, I do not know the how.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Firstly: you shouldn't do it. If method is to be called from outside of the class, it should be public, not private. And that's the path you should follow.
The backdoor to access private methods and fields is reflection (but it's bad). But I think you can solve your issue by changing methods' access to public.
|
|
|
|
|
You can also try Protected Friend in their declarations
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am new to multithreading, and I am considering implementing multithreading in my code.
I am using MDI application with two child forms. On first child form I have all the controls and user interface (ChildForm1).
Second child form is used for data analisys and drawing graphs (ChildForm2).
ChildForm1 implements:
1) serial port communication (communication with microprocessor on PCB board)
2) data acquisition from intrument connected to computer (LAN) (up to 200ms for each data acquisition)
3) data processing and controls
Currently I am using timer control to comminicate over serial port (10 times per second - checking the conditions), triggering
data acquisition (when conditions are met) and finaly processing data and drawing graphs on another child form (real time).
As I use single thread, I am experiencing some delays (application not running smoothly as it waits for comm process and data processing).
What would be the right approach in setting multithread application ?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
There basically are two schemes you have to choose from.
1.
if the timer is a Windows.Forms.Timer and your Tick handler is short (less than 10 msec), then everything should be OK. That requires there are no blocking I/O methods called. So when your peripheral needs 200 msec to perform a data acquisition, it would only work smoothly if that gets handled asynchronously, i.e. in one timer tick you issue a "start acquisition" command without waiting for the results; and in a different handler (or a later tick of the timer) you issue a "now deliver the available data" command.
2.
If the above is not possible, the alternative is to have a second thread that takes care of communicating with your peripheral and preparing the new data; it should then use the Control.InvokeRequired/Invoke pattern to update the GUI. See this little article[^].
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
modified on Monday, June 7, 2010 8:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
I am making a setup installer(windows installer) which will install my application .I require a serial number window to integrate. I am using the "Customer information" window of setup project. There is an option of serial number entry. But the problem is i cant change the algo of validate serial key. the in-built algo is too week. Please help me, tell me how i can integrate serial number in "setup.msi"
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Here is really nice tutorial how to customize Windows installer msi packages.It demonstrates how to solve your problem and lots more.
Life is a stage and we are all actors!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
How can I convert PDF to Tiff through C#?
Best wishes
|
|
|
|
|
See here[^].
My signature "sucks" today
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all,
Apart from saving setting of app in DB , what are other option which one can use.
I know few like saving in registry, file.
But applications like ccleaner, and some small utilities, dont think they save it in registry, or file. As in their program files directory there present no file.
So ,How they able to save settings ?
a) How they achieve this?
b) Is there a way by which i can embed my DB file inside .exe/.dll file.
Regards
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know for sure how does ccleaner do it, but I suppose it saves it in file located in your user profile. On Windows XP it would be somewhere in "C:\Documents and Settings\%user name%\ApplicationData" (I don't remember exact path and I don't have XP to check  ). In Vista and 7 it's somewhere in "C:\Users\%user name%\AppData". Take a look at this[^]. It provides you with paths, where you can store settings for every user. You should use "Environment.SpecialFolder.ApplicationData" probably and create there subdirectory for your application. This way you will be able to store settings for every user. When those settings are stored in application directory, they are common for all users and when one user changes something, all users are affected. And why write code to support multiple users, when system does it for you 
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
