|
yes. I tried that way too but the data inside the nested repeater doesn't show up.
suchita
|
|
|
|
|
hi
how to call published web pages from windows services that I create
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can use a System.Net.HttpWebRequest from any type of application.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Currently considering to learn som C# to use professional at work. I've been looking at courses from "www.learndevnow.com" and "www.learnvisualstudio.net". Any one with experience with these or have any recommendations.
/Eiel
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have no experience with online programming courses, but I'm a bit suspicious about them (I'm talking about payd courses, not about tutorials of course). Expecially if you are already experienced with programming in any other language, I think the best is to buy a good book, and make experiments with sample application (you can download plenty of them from Code Project).
Cheers,
Sauro
|
|
|
|
|
I second that.
|
|
|
|
|
Good post!
|
|
|
|
|
Online programming courses suck. Many of which will teach you a way to do something that is the wrong way, skipping fundamentals which will later be harder to learn. The easiest way to learn and master programming is to start with a task. A common one that new programmers often choose is the task of making an encrypted, peer-peer chat application. It covers all of the bases and is just hard enough to teach you something good. Also, a beginners book can be very helpful because you can flip through it rapidly.
|
|
|
|
|
Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: will teach you a way to do something that is the wrong way
Of course, the books I've seen do that too.
|
|
|
|
|
You are correct. However, the books at least have to go through publishing whereas online tutorials are often copy and pasted outright theft of others work with no real knowledge by the other. Or worse, in online tutorials, the Author usually starts with an overly complex example to demonstrate a trivial task.
|
|
|
|
|
I also recommend starting with a book. But I found that it wasn't enough for me so I took a course and it made a lot of difference. The ability to speak with and get feedback from someone who knows the subject can be quite valuable.
At the moment I find myself having to learn [the .net language that shall not be named] so I will likely buy a book today.
|
|
|
|
|
I recommend Option Strict On as the very first line.
|
|
|
|
|
I shall endeavor to check that that is in their coding standards... if they have any.
|
|
|
|
|
I added it to my vbc.rsp file -- putting it in every file is just silly.
|
|
|
|
|
that turns you into an advanced VB jockey.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's worth doing (it isn't), it's worth doing right.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Only three things you need to know,
1) Option Explicit
2) AndElse, AndOr (OMFG)
|
|
|
|
|
When I was looking at a list of differences between the langauges on Wikipedia yesterday I noticed that they have IsNot ; I want that in C#.
|
|
|
|
|
object1.ReferenceEquals(object2)
Edit, shows how much I use it. should be
Object.ReferenceEquals(object1, object2);
|
|
|
|
|
|
T M Gray wrote: Once you have a grasp on the basics
In my opinion, neither ASP.net nor WinForms is "the basics" -- new developers should learn "the basics" of the language before attempting ASP.net and WinForms.
|
|
|
|
|
That is a very purist point of view. For many people if they don't apply what they learn to real situations they won't absorb it as well. And to me, you don't really know the basics if you can't produce something useful. If I say I have a basic knowledge of chess I would be implying I could actually play a game start to finish. Using your definition of the basics it would only imply I could identiy the pieces.
|
|
|
|