|
I swear there is no "Vote to Remove Message". I even searched this text in the website but didnt find.
Thank you for sparing your valuable time to read my views. Please feel free to suggest and comment on my articles. Your feedback will be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, I see that link on the message in question. In that case, just vote the message a 1-vote. I think that has the same effect. I'm sure the site admins will get back to you to let you know what else might be going on (e.g., a permission issue or a bug).
|
|
|
|
|
Allright, thank you. Is there a way to directly report the Administrator of the website to remove that message or report that member for using foul language?
Thank you for sparing your valuable time to read my views. Please feel free to suggest and comment on my articles. Your feedback will be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
This forum is your best chance to do that. Though the message was not that severe. Personally, I'd just vote the message a 1 and move on. Though, if you are the person who voted that person's message a 1, you might want to reply to them to tell them why you voted them a 1... people sometimes get offended when they are 1-voted without a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems "Vote to Remove Message" is reputation based and you have not accumulated enough reputation points yet in order to be able to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
"Vote to Remove Message" is rep based. It's not visible to all. I think it's silver authority and above.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I have forwarded that info on to the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
If you re-read the comment you will note that Xmen W.K actually wrote "OoO somebody voted me 1 for telling the truth...good work moron, thats all you could do." in response to someone 1-voting his original comment on your article. His 'moron' comment was not directed at you; and to be fair the term 'moron' is not considered foul language by most English speakers.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: His 'moron' comment was not directed at you
It was if he was the univoter. 
|
|
|
|
|
In which case it was justified.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: and to be fair the term 'moron' is not considered foul language by most English speakers.
Yeah, now had he called him a mormon, well then that'd have been different. 
|
|
|
|
|
Are you saying:
1) All Univoters are Mormons?
2) All Mormons are Univoters?
3) All Mormons are morons?
4) All morons are Mormons?
or
5) Some combination of the above.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to keep my mormon opinions to myself!
|
|
|
|
|
Cop out! 
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
...Because they are in general a nice, wholesome bunch, (give or take the outliers that every religion has).
Tread carefully, Nish.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I was not serious there Chris and hence the smiley. While I am not religious myself I don't usually put down religions and sub-religions, I just ignore them most of the time. I just picked mormon here because it went with moron in the OP's post, and like muslims and jews, mormons are also often mass stereotyped unfairly - I just used that with purely humorous intent.
|
|
|
|
|
And their most famous adherents have really great teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
He's not calling you a moron, he's calling the 1-voter a moron because his post got 1-voted without any comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you all for your comments. I agree with what you say.
But this forum is for intellectual and technical people. There should be no room for any such words here. Rest all your wish.
Thank you for sparing your valuable time to read my views. Please feel free to suggest and comment on my articles. Your feedback will be greatly appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
Amit Kumar Tiwari wrote: But this forum is for intellectual and technical people.
No, it's for anyone. Whether they are intellectual, technical or not is irrelevant; and a bit of gentle abuse from time to time helps to stop us getting "too up ourselves", as we non-intellectuals like to say.
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: as we non-intellectuals like to say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The problem is not in the question but in Luc's answer. You need to fix the html in Luc's response.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks but the answer was locked out, Improve Answer wasn't working. I assume because the answer had been accepted. Or perhaps because of the formatting. Someone with higher powers has corrected it though.
I know the language. I've read a book. - _Madmatt
|
|
|
|
|
It seems Luc edited his answer a few minutes ago.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
