|
It's narrower than the page in order to leave room for the auto-suggestions.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This guy left [Edit]an[/Edit] advert.
(The link was kaput!!!)
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Ex-spammer.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Very confusing.
Your 'this advert...' link now points to a totally different article.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
The link pionts to a message at the bottom of an article. I imagine once that message got deleted, the link defaulted to the article.
|
|
|
|
|
for the article tags on the home page.
Now I can skip all those nasty .NET articles that Nish warned me about. 
|
|
|
|
|
Hans Dietrich wrote: Now I can skip all those nasty .NET articles that Nish warned me about. 
I think Nish also writing many .NET articles so be ready.
|
|
|
|
|
I like it. (positive reinforcement)
One thing, though, and I can't quantify this but could we not have the original poster name on the same line as the subject with the updater (if any) moved down to the same line as the pretty new tag indicators. As I say, I can't quantify this but I really found it odd not having the original poster information. (hopefully constructive criticism)
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
I've gone back and forwards on this for a while and I found having both simply made it so I wouldn't read either.
So my decision was:
On the "Active" tab you see who was last active.
On the other tabs you see who posted.
I was going to have 2 columns but there simply wasn't room. I was also going to leave just the poster's name, but for the active tab I really wanted to reward those who were active on each question - the ones doing the actual work.
My final thought was: what does it tell you if you know the name of the poster? A serious question, this one, and one that I started thinking pointed to a decision to not show poster's names at all. Possibly.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Visited link colorization is gone. Intentional?
Personal opinion: It's better to have colorization of already visited links in Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
It was getting messy with too many colours: blue, grey, maroon.
Ah, what the heck. I'll add colourisation back for visited.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
When I view 'My Posts', isin't it redundant to show posters name?
Though it doesn't matter as we have enough space out there, but just not much of significance.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but consistent with the rest of the UI, and if it's a post that you're a co-author on, then both names will appear there.
Not that we provide a GUI in which to do that yet...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: if it's a post that you're a co-author on, then both names will appear there.
That explains it then.
Ok. 
|
|
|
|
|
All of that makes sense. It is probably me being old and reactionary.
The first Q I looked at was this[^] one. I looked at it without checking who the poster was. When I exited I saw Chris Maunder where I expected to see the poster and just found it 'odd'.
I also should have mentioned this in the original message but I'm not seeing the 'open in new tab/window' widget. My connection is playing up a bit so they may just not be loading for me but I found them useful, so if they are missing, can we have them back please.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm open to ideas on how to show everything while keeping things clean. Maybe just stick to the poster? Maybe to none...
As to the open in a new window, I removed them shift+click does the same thing and all they do is add unnecessary payload.
I guess I could add them via javascript...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: As to the open in a new window, I removed them shift+click does the same thing and all they do is add unnecessary payload.
Yes, I'm set up to use middle click. I just got used to them is all.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
I wouldn't let CG touch my Abacus!
When you're wrestling a gorilla, you don't stop when you're tired, you stop when the gorilla is.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: My final thought was: what does it tell you if you know the name of the poster? A serious question, this one, and one that I started thinking pointed to a decision to not show poster's names at all. Possibly.
Knowing the poster's name can be polite.
It also allows for more interaction between OP/Responder/Commenters.
Can't it, Chris?
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
You'll always see full poster and editor details on the page hosting the question itself.
Just thought that having a comprehensive breakdown on the Question page rather than on the gateway page would be a good idea 
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Gotcha!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Yuck!
It Implies more importance to views and scores than it does to the questions.
It looks too 'busy'.
There is too much information at that level, and whilst stats can be useful, they should be more unobtrusive as a first page item, and perhaps have the more comprehensive breakdown on the Question page rather than on the gateway page.
And all the tabs as separate blocks underneath spoil the general readability.
Just my 2d.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Having the answer count (an important metric for those browsing questions to see which need some lovin') on the right was too much of a separation. Bringing it to the left made it trivial to connect answer count and question.
Leaving the view count on the right looked...odd. Removing it would have caused howls of protest (though I'm still tempted). Removing the vote count and replacing it with a single star if it's upvoted seemed, to me, a reduction in noise and a devaluing of the importance of scores.
Dalek Dave wrote: And all the tabs as separate blocks underneath spoil the general readability.
Readability of the question, or readability of the tags that are a decider for many as to whether they'll read the question? Suggestions? Dim the box?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
My activity in the questions doesn't appear to show up on the question list page, but I see everyone else's.
Using IE7 on Vista
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
