|
Thanks Holmes, you're absolutely right, actually, I never used the designer when it comes to database programming and this's exactly why I'm asking now.. Guess I'll just have to forget about the designer.. I thought if it will make my life easier, why not to go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
I kicked off a Delete where value > 2 statement. I didn't expect it take take more than a couple of minutes, which has been the case for similar deletes on similar tables. But, it has been executing for 34 minutes, and when I run this statement, the status is suspended.
SELECT start_time, status, command FROM sys.dm_exec_requests
Any ideas as to how to check if or why the initial query is suspended or seemingly not running anymore.
Edit:
Using SQL '05, have seen some answers that suggest upgrading the SP2, but that is not an option right now.
Could this be related to lack of space on the drive where the tempdb and masterdb are stored and the OS is running?
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, it is a pageiolatch issue, lack of disk space.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
Only a computer programmer would make a delete operation fail because there is not enough space. 
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh, I had too much faith in the admin. I moved the files for my Database to the E drive with enough space. He had a C drive as the OS drive with only 12 gig, and a D drive that was, from my understanding, supposed to be for programs, including SQL. The clown admin installed SQL to the system C drive with very limited space. It turns out the temp table and log files were getting full, jamming up the OS/SQL D: drive. I should say that this definitely is not my fault, as I don't remote to the machine ever, just use SQL Server Management Studio. So there was no way for me to be worried about it, or know about it even.
Craigslist Troll: litaly@comcast.net
"I have a theory that the truth is never told during the nine-to-five hours. "
— Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
If you have a SP where you (among other things) need to extract the number of a certain rowtype, and you do this:
SELECT a, b, c, d, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM table1 WHERE my_condition1=1) AS FooBarCount, e, f FROM table2 WHERE my_condition2=1;
it seems to me that the performance ought to be remarkably slower than if you do:
SELECT a, b, c, d, (SELECT COUNT(table1s_indexed_column) FROM table1 WHERE my_condition1=1) AS FooBarCount, e, f FROM table2 WHERE my_condition2=1;
At least according to everything I've learnt until now.
Can anybody confirm if I'm right or not?
Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
-----
Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
-----
Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
-----
Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects - Will Rogers, 1924
|
|
|
|
|
It depends. But in general, I wouldn't expect so. But that's some weird code, there must be a better way.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't answer your question with 100% certainty, but you should explore the SQL Profiler and run your queries through them to see what execution plan is choosen. Remember that just because an index exists, the optimizer may choose not to use it; resulting in a table scan.
Experiment with SQL Profiler and you can learn alot.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
I read somewhere[^] that the difference between count(*) and count(1) or count(indexed_column) is not nearly as relevant now as it used to be in the past. Basically, once the writers of the database engines learned of the problem, they quietly fixed it. The habit of writing count(1), however, outlived the bug. In the late nineties, using count(indexed_column) or count(1) would make queries a lot faster on many commercial engines (e.g. Oracle-7). At this point, however, most modern DB engines with the "non-toy" status should prefer count(*) to count(1).
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the performance would be like but your code seems a bit weired. Does table1 and table2 have any relationship(column[s]) in common? it seems to be you're going to end up with a cartesian product of some sort.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am getting the following error-
SQL> conn msdp/msdp
ERROR:
ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress
Warning: You are no longer connected to ORACLE.
Kindly help me what to do
Ish Kumar Kapila
|
|
|
|
|
|
The “ORA-01033: ORACLE initialization or shutdown in progress.” error can also happen when Oracle is attempting startup or shutdown and is "hanging" on a resource such as a failed disk, writing to redo, etc.
Wait for few minutes and retry..
If after few tries it comes, restart your machine.
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Suppose I have this customer orders table in which we have to specify a customer for the new order, however, customers are most of the time the same so we just need to make it easier when creating the new order and list the customer name from the box.
I tried changing the datasource, value member and display member but it doesn't work.
Please help.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to be more specific, cause your above scenario probably not indicate the actual issues.
Thanks
Md. Marufuzzaman
I will not say I have failed 1000 times; I will say that I have discovered 1000 ways that can cause failure – Thomas Edison.
|
|
|
|
|
i have to import xml document having size more than 10GB in Sql Server database. i also have to do XSD Validation before Processing and maintain transaction. Please suggest me the best way to do the same. should i use SSIS packege? is it capable of Processing such large document? or Do i have to use c# coding to accomplish this task?
|
|
|
|
|
you can do this using SSIS package. Please check this
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your Reply.
i apologize for reposting question in Asp.net and c#.
Would SSIS be capable for importing data from Large Xml Document(more than 10GB)?
did you try it?
|
|
|
|
|
I suggest you proceed cautiously.
That is a big file and the vast majority of solutions deal with smaller files.
If it was me I think I would do the following
1. Create an app that does nothing but divide it into smaller files. Might not even do validation.
2. Create a second app that consumes the smaller files, validates, logs the file processed and then post to the database.
Advantages in the above.
1. If an error occurs you are going to need to manually review it. And reviewing a file that is 10/100 meg is easier than 10 gig.
2. If an error occurs you can manually fix and continue with the file that errored, rather than restarting everything.
3. You don't need to deal with the issue that the file is just too big for some part of the process.
Regardless however you must have the following features.
1. Log as you complete each block (insert, whatever) of work so you not only know where something failed but also can track that it succeeded.
2. Insure that transaction blocks are small. 1000 is probably a good number.
3. Design for the possibility that something will fail so you have a way to restart it at the failure point.
|
|
|
|
|
I have 2GB RAM in my machine. i tried SSIS package for 1.5GB file it's giving error.
Error: 0xC02092AF at Data Flow Task, XML Source [1]: The component "XML Source" (1) was unable to process the XML data. Insufficient memory to continue the execution of the program.
If SSIS is not right choice than i have to follow the process as jschell suggest. can anyone give me some code sample for splitinf file into smaller one. i can split 10GB file into 10 1GB smaller files not more.
If i process 10 1GB files than how can i maintain transaction in all files? i mean to say if 1 file fails all others files should be rollbacked.
|
|
|
|
|
ntiin wrote: If i process 10 1GB files than how can i maintain transaction in all files? i
mean to say if 1 file fails all others files should be rollbacked.
I doubt that is reasonable. It might not even be possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Your reply to this topic has not just helped him... 
I never thought of divide and conquering files for those advantages, thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes this is not much helpful for me .
i am tring SSIS Package to do so.
Can anyone help me on topic "SSIS Package for Importing XML files"?
|
|
|
|
|
This is the Sql-Query
SELECT "tempBillDetails"."SampleNumber", "tempBillDetails"."Description", "tempBillDetails"."Amount", "tempBilling"."BillNo", "tempBilling"."BillDate", "tempBilling"."PartyName", "NewSampleEntrys"."NameOfSample", "NewSampleEntrys"."BatchNo", "tempBilling"."AgmarkCharges", "tempBilling"."DisplayName", "tempBilling"."OtherCharges", "tempBilling"."Discount", "tempBilling"."OtherChargesFor", "Charges"."FTest", "Charges"."Flag"
FROM ("Quali"."dbo"."NewSampleEntrys" "NewSampleEntrys" INNER JOIN (("Quali"."dbo"."tempBillDetails" "tempBillDetails" left OUTER JOIN "Quali"."dbo"."tempBilling" "tempBilling" ON "tempBillDetails"."BillNo"="tempBilling"."BillNo") INNER JOIN "Quali"."dbo"."SampleRegistration" "SampleRegistration" ON "tempBillDetails"."SampleNumber"="SampleRegistration"."SampleNumber") ON "NewSampleEntrys"."QLID"="SampleRegistration"."QlCode") INNER JOIN "Quali"."dbo"."Charges" "Charges" ON "SampleRegistration"."QlCode"="Charges"."QlCode"
ORDER BY "tempBillDetails"."SampleNumber"
it work fine if all tables having data.
my problem is that it only "tempBilling" contain record and no matching record in other table it show nothing i want that tempBilling data sholud be display.
how can i solve this problem plz help.
modified on Monday, April 18, 2011 2:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
