|
I had a look at the original link you posted; it seems that you need to do some edits to your solution and project files to get 2005 to support this project type. Alternatively you could check the Microsoft site for suggestions.
The best things in life are not things.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks.
I resolved the issue. The issue was, I have no Web Projects option while opening the solution file. I tried to open using WebSite option. So there was a patch up by Microsoft for Visual Studio 2005 Web Application Project Setup which I downloaded installed. It was working fine now.
Success is the good fortune that comes from aspiration, desperation, perspiration and inspiration.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I am working on WPF application, which was first targeted to 3.0 framework. When I tried to make it work on 4.0, I got following Exception.
System.IO.FileNotFoundException was unhandled
Message: Could not load file or assembly 'PresentationFramework, Version=3.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file
specified.
If I compile application using .Net 4.0 it is working fine. But 3.0 exes are not working with 4.0.
Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
Drop the reference to PresentationFramework from your project and add the version that is targetted at 4. You need to do this because the rewrite to version 4 means that certain things have moved.
|
|
|
|
|
Will this make my application work on both 3.0 and 4.0?
Thanks for Reply.
|
|
|
|
|
No. Your application either works as .NET 3 or it works as 4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
So I've done a bit of searching this morning looking for a way to execute Javascript inside C# code, and I found Jint[^] and Javascript.net[^].
I'm looking at these two frameworks going "what's the freakin' difference, really?" The syntax looks almost identical, I don't really care about performance (unless it's particularly poor). I looked at the latest updates and they're both reasonably recent. So does anybody know? Anybody used them?
I'm going to start playing with them but does anyone know before I head too far down a certain path if one is the road to the dark side? Also, I've never really used open source stuff like this before, so is it a good idea to look at how unkempt the code itself is given it might fall into disrepair?
Typical n-tiered architecture:
DB <-> Junk(0) <-> ... <-> Junk(n-1) <-> Pretty
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't tried my hands on it yet, but both surely look syntactically same.
The difference is:
Javascript.Net uses Google's V8 Javascript engine (which is integrated in it).
&
Jint is itself a script engine. Jint embeds it's own parsing logic, and really interprets the scripts. Jint uses the ANTLR library for this purpose.
Jint was reported to be too buggy and introduced too many .Net semantics into Javascript.
>> JavaScript.NET used V8 and less bug-prone
>> Jint has better support for integrating between C# and JavaScript
Please share your experience with us. 
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neither better nor worse than 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: I don't do impressions.
How about this[^]then? And this[^]?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
You've rumbled pete! He will be on Britains Got Talent soon
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm sure he has the required talent; if only he jacked up his assertiveness a bit, he could be the next Susan Boyle...
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm concerned that you are stalking my old posts. I feel dirty now, and not in a good way.
|
|
|
|
|
*my* memory is still OK, and the CP search facilities have improved remarkably.
BTW: you're out of milk again.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
Please use <PRE> tags for code snippets, they preserve indentation, improve readability, and make me actually look at the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes one creates a dynamic impression by saying something, and sometimes one creates as significant an impression by remaining silent.
|
|
|
|
|
Enjoying PLINQ[^], didn't use the Memory Mapped File-wrapper[^], didn't try the BigInt[^]. Aw, the way you abbreviated 'subject' reminds me of Lazy(Of Subject)[^]. Better support for multithreading, doesn't hickup on garbage-collection.
Gives the impression that it has enough new goodies to keep us happy, for a while
I are Troll 
|
|
|
|
|
My impression of .Net...
Wife asks for a Knife. I hand her the knife.
Wife asks for a Scissors. I hand her the scissors.
Wife asks for the car keys. I hand her the car keys.
Wife thinks I'm great.
Wife asks for a pen...I hand her a pencil and some ink.
Wife is annoyed.
Wife asks for some help.... I ignore her.
Wife asks Google for some help.
Google "negotiates" with me on wife's behalf and passes on my help.
Wife constructs a half assed pen from her pencil and ink, and moans about
why I couldn't just give her a damn pen in the first place.
Wife divorces me and marries a new version of me.
I still don't do pens, but when you ask for help, I'm better at telling you I don't.
-Rd
Hit any user to continue.
|
|
|
|
|
Good for rapid development, bad for support
♫ 99 little bugs in the code,
99 bugs in the code
We fix a bug, compile it again
101 little bugs in the code ♫
|
|
|
|
|
I am not fully satisfied.
|
|
|
|
|
Its not too bad.
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
