|
Can anyone help me getting information regarding the handles and threads count for a process on WinNT/win2k/WinXP platform.
I need to get this infomration using c/c++ code just like the values which are shown in TaskManager. I could get information about CPU utilisation using performance counters. But how to go about the handles and threads??
Addy
|
|
|
|
|
You can get the handle and thread counts using performance counters (at least with PDH). You just have to have the right name for the performance object, which is easy to find using perfmon.
|
|
|
|
|
Tnx for the info , I will be really thankful if you could put some more light on this and elaborate. How can I get the names for the performance objects?
Addy
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry my other post was anonymous (I accidentally wasn't logged in)...
If you would like to find the names of the performance objects, click the Start Menu, then click Run, then type "perfmon". Now, you will see the performance monitor program. From here, you can click the "+" toolbar icon, and it will show you counters and all sorts of other information. You can even see a description of what each counter is actually counting. For a description of the naming scheme, check here[^]. If you'd like to take a look at the APIs required to do this, I would start here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/perfmon/base/about_performance_monitoring.asp[^]
Chris Richardson
Programmers find all sorts of ingenious ways to screw ourselves over. - Tim Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have looked at Windows 98 and I believe the registry setting which store the Find Computer History is in
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\FindComputerMRU
and for Run history it is at
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\RunMRU
I was wondering if anyone knows or can confirm the location of these keys in Windows XP and Windows 2000?
Thanks in advance.
Effiniti->
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have a query regarding MBR. Can you help me in any possible way.
I want to execute a program along with MBR (ie. before MBR loads). The executable copy of program is kept in my hard drive itself.
eg. I want to call C:\myprg.exe along with MBR.
Hoping for a positive reply
|
|
|
|
|
This is not possible. The code in the MBR is the very first thing executed when the computer is started, so no operating system is loaded at the time.
--Mike--
I'm bored... Episode I bored.
1ClickPicGrabber - Grab & organize pictures from your favorite web pages, with 1 click!
My really out-of-date homepage
Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Dunn wrote:
The code in the MBR is the very first thing executed
I knew this but....
Michael Dunn wrote:
so no operating system is loaded at the time.
I missed this!!! 
I was born intelligent
Education ruined me!.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello All,
I have previously developed a device driver for Windows NT 4.0. That was in 1999. I've since moved on to other projects. 4 years on now, I'm currently requird to port my original WinNT device driver to Windows XP.
I'm wondering if thw Windows NT device driver source codes (written in C) can still be used in WinXP ?
Has anyone done such porting before ?
Thanks, All,
Bio.
|
|
|
|
|
For months I've been fighting two problems, on two different systems. I finally made some headway that I should pass on to those who tried to help resolve them.
One is a problem with unreliable printing on a WinXP network. Shared printers would work for a while, albeit badly, then stop responding. I finally solved it this week. In the Add Printer wizard you are offerred a couple of ways to assign a printer. Using the \\hostname\printername method is the first choice in the list, via a tree directory, so that's the method I've been using. Bad choice - it doesn't work. Lower down the list are the hosts on the network, each with a sub-entry for its shared printer. Selecting those shares solved the problem completely, though I have no idea why.
The second is my home Win2K server. Since the last Windows Update it has been freezing up - no errors, no events, no Dr. Watson - every two days or so. Yesterday I talked with my ISP, and he's been plagued by the same problem, both on his servers, and on his customers' PCs. The one thing they all have in common, without exception, is that they all have SP1 on IE6. For all of them, the problem started when SP1 was applied. He's tried to roll back the SP, but that corrupts IE6, and the Add/Remove Programs 'Repair' option disappears, so he has to reinstall the entire program from scratch to recover. It doesn't appear to make any difference which version of the OS is running, either - WinXP has a much improved error handling system and usually doesn't need to be rebooted, but it does stop and restart explorer.exe when IE freezes the system. It's not yet a solution, but it seems to be an explanation, at least.
I'm going to ask him to survey his customers to see if we can determine whether there are any who have IE6SP1 who have not experienced the problem. Maybe we can figure out a resolution that way, since MS hasn't ackowledged it or provided a fix yet. Or maybe we'll find out something completely different - who knows at this stage? It could be something in his network interacting with IE... If anyone's interested, I'll post the fix, if any, when we find it.
Thanks to all who have tried to help with these problems previously!
Nobody wants to read a diary by someone who has not seen the shadow of Bubba on the prison shower wall in front of them!
Paul Watson, on BLOGS and privacy - 1/16/2003
|
|
|
|
|
I *think* I've installed IE6SP1, but I use Mozilla as my default web browser, and haven't noticed the problem you mention, so It could be a case that IE has to be used lots until it eventually bogs down and dies.
Have you tried just leaving your computer on, but not using it at all, to see if it crashes when unattended and unused?
--
Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
|
|
|
|
|
benjymous wrote:
Have you tried just leaving your computer on, but not using it at all, to see if it crashes when unattended and unused?
Yup. It does. 
Nobody wants to read a diary by someone who has not seen the shadow of Bubba on the prison shower wall in front of them!
Paul Watson, on BLOGS and privacy - 1/16/2003
|
|
|
|
|
I notice the Power Management functionality ("SpeedStep") for Intel mobile CPUs has been "built into" WinXP and the controls for it removed from the user. Does anyone know if it is possible to change the settings somewhere in the registry?
Starbeee
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everbody.
This time I need help about FTP service in IIS.
I have a folder "c:\Publications " that I want to open this folder to FTP connection. And anyboby would put his/her publication to it without promting any user name or password. Also could not delete none of the items in this folder. People could reach my web site (in my computer that works XP proffesional) and it works without any problem.
thanx all previous answers.![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
karanba
|
|
|
|
|
Well
1) First make a virtual directory called anonymous in you ftp root which should point to c:\publications. you can do this from ISM ( microsoft control)
2) in ISM find out who the anonymous user for your web site is. say its IUSER
3) Not open explorer c:\
4) For Publications directory give write/read access to IUSER but only on that directory and not to its children.
Having write permission on that directory IUSER can upload and read files. But not having write permission on the children of that directory i.e. files and sub folders ... he can't delete any files.
Swarup Das
|
|
|
|
|
How could I disable task manager from other users.
OS: XP professional
karanba
|
|
|
|
|
You could take the easy way out and remove the taskmgr.exe file from the system
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't it disable to use task manager also for Admin group. I want to do it only for normal users.
karanba
|
|
|
|
|
Try right clicking on it and playing with the security settings.
Remove the read/execute rights for everyone by the admin group. That might work.
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
|
|
|
|
|
How can I luck my session instead of log off or switch user. I use XP professional.
karanba
|
|
|
|
|
You can "lock" your workstation, by hitting Ctrl+Alt+Delete, then hit Space or click the "Lock Computer" button.
Chris Richardson
Programmers find all sorts of ingenious ways to screw ourselves over. - Tim Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Ctrl+Alt+Delete only gets Task Manager Window.
karanba
|
|
|
|
|
That's not how it works on my machine. Did somebody configure your machine (like system administrator)? You can also try "Window Button"+L.
Chris Richardson
Programmers find all sorts of ingenious ways to screw ourselves over. - Tim Smith
|
|
|
|
|
Definately sounds like his system has either been locked down or altered, maybe a custom GINA?
Paul Watson wrote:
"At the end of the day it is what you produce that counts, not how many doctorates you have on the wall."
George Carlin wrote:
"Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things."
|
|
|
|
|
It's different in XP. You need to turn off the new flashy login screen in order for C+A+D to work as it did in previous versions of NT. (You might have to do something else too, maybe disable fast user switching too, not sure)
--Mike--
I'm bored... Episode I bored.
1ClickPicGrabber - Grab & organize pictures from your favorite web pages, with 1 click!
My really out-of-date homepage
Sonork-100.19012 Acid_Helm
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
