|
I'm not native english speaking. Which means that my english is far from perfect. A couple of years ago when I wrote articles you were very good at proof reading and fixing my grammar errors.
I used to wait for an edit and then check the diff to see which errors I've made and learn from them.
I've written three articles in a short time. And it doesn't seem like you proof read at all now. And that's sad imho. That was one of the best things with writing articles here. I could trust you to help me improve my articles (and let me learn thanks to that).
Please read articles more carefully before you publish them. Especially if someone writes "please proof read" in the editor comment box.
|
|
|
|
|
If English is not your native language then I would say your writing is remarkable, considering. Which article in particular are you looking at?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you have a strong grasp of spelling and grammar. I've gone ahead and finely combed these over, but I'd be happy to go more in depth with the proofreading of your articles if you'd like. Feel free to email me about any changes to your articles (now or later) and I'd be happy to go over the changes/additions I applied and why. Some of it is preference (I find commas in particular to be individual taste) but I'm happy to explore the "why" of all the changes if you would find that helpful.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
modified 18-May-12 8:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe email links require a "mailto:" to be prefixed to the URL for them to work*. The current link you created makes it look as if there's a forum dedicated entirely to your email. 
*Though, I wouldn't recommend putting your email on a public forum at all (especially not in plain text form).
|
|
|
|
|
Drat.  Thanks for the catch.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think either of those articles were actually "edited" - they were just "approved". And perhaps while approving, some quick HTML fixes may have been done.
In the old days, an article would show as unedited, and most editors would often make quick fixes and leave it unedited. They'd only mark it as edited once they did a full proof-read/editing on it. But with the new system, there's no such "unedited" status any more and this may be what's confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I would like to delete my account because I'm not using it.
Can you please help me and let me know when this happens?
Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
this account? I can do that in 2 sec.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I´ve completed my article "Get injected into the world of inverted dependencies" but can't uncheck the "Work in progress". I´ve tried several times to uncheck it and publish the article.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about this.
Your article is in pending now.
You should be able to change it freely from pending back to composing ("work in progress" ) and vice versa.
Sincerely,
Elina Blank
Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it!
|
|
|
|
|
Chris,
I have this in my Rep. history: "16 May 2012 12:20 PM Newsletter opt-in (undo) Participant MailoutType Feedback -50". The only thing I changed yesterday was checking the box that allowed private emails to my messages. As far as I can see, I'm opted in to all the newsletters. So what gives?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed. It was an old, inactive newsletter that you were opted out of. Elina's fixed the spurious rep.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Five days to respond? Either you're slacking, were out of coffee, or were on vacation. Which is it?
And thanks (to you and Elina)!
|
|
|
|
|
5 days? I think you're DATEDIFF function needs some work.
You need to pay extra for the 5-day express service. Besides, there was thinking time involved. And pondering. And there was a certain amount of staring at one's navel that had to be completed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 5 days? I think you're DATEDIFF function needs some work.
Oops! I thought it was May 12, 2017 instead of May 17, 2012. 
Chris Maunder wrote: And there was a certain amount of staring at one's navel that had to be
completed.
Ah, yes, the original lint tool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Your search engine will not give response when there "70,000" users online users in your website.
when i search my query to find my solution, i tried to get result, but it's not giving error, then my request automatically completed, but to giving result.
|
|
|
|
|
What was your search term?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible that "history" is lost for some users?
This user http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=8697687[^], "Member 8697687" has a pretty good score of 15.000 or so points.
Which is remarkable considering the membership states 2 months since joining. The CodeProject activity:
20 messages
1 comment
2 Q&A Questions
3 Q&A Answers
Im not a reputation hunter, but since reputations can affect rating etc, etc it is a sensitive area at CodeProject. I would really not like to see the reputation system being hacked.
Best Regards
Kjell
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly he has downloaded many files
---------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC Link[ ^]
English League Tables - Live
|
|
|
|
|
|
i have created a following article.
Article
Here there is CSS formatting section which contain some garbage. Can someone correct it? I tried several times but could not.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
