|
In the previous windows 7 also your comment is there:
Good to see spammers are reporting abuse.
You guys are sick fellows in the code project, dono how you guys are members
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Chris, can you take a look at the comments on the article Building High Performance WPF/E Enterprise Class Application in C# 4.5 that were posted the 15th of June and see if those accounts were created from the same IP address? You can ignore the rest of this message, as I'm just replying to the OP.
kishhr wrote: There are thousand of ppl. whose names are similar, in india
That was not the only indicator. And have many people in India with the last name "Farewell"? And the name was not the only indicator, like I said. They were also mostly posted on the same day.
kishhr wrote: I believe you are friend or know Ian personally and wanna support his comment
I do know Ian from the forums here. He and I are very active members. I have never met him in person. And I would support any comment which appears to be correct.
kishhr wrote: I can understand by the name you have kept itself, you are sick spammer
Most every member who has seen my activity here on Code Project would disagree. I suspect Chris (one of the co-founders of this site), who I have met in person, would also disagree.
kishhr wrote: I strongly see you are set of spammers operating collectively
And you are strongly wrong.
kishhr wrote: If i wanna popularize i would have hundred's of account, and made 100's of comments so that i can get an award or something, why not done by me
Have you ever seen Basic Instinct? The main character writes a book about killing somebody, and then kills the person as described in the book, then in her defense says "why would I kill a person in that exact manner? It would be too obvious." So she was using evidence in support of her guilt as evidence of her innocence. This is very similar to what you are doing. Perhaps you didn't put 100's of comments because you wanted to use that as an excuse later on.
I think you've been caught with your hand in the cookie jar, and now you are getting defensive about being caught. Sorry if I'm wrong, but that's the way it looks from my perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh...... i see, i insist you to pl. consult a doctor first, we can think about the rest, the first option you said i should really appreciate,
that have some sense though,
Hi, chris, you pl. check if from same IP, if not i really ask you to close these spammer account permanently, lot of good guys land in bad trouble because of these sick fellows......
Pl. do the same
|
|
|
|
|
AspDotNetDev wrote: Have you ever seen Basic Instinct? The main character writes a book about killing somebody, and then kills the person as described in the book, then in her defense says "why would I kill a person in that exact manner? It would be too obvious." So she was using evidence in support of her guilt as evidence of her innocence.
 Still I didn't see Basic Instinct. You should have mentioned spoiler alert.
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone 
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry, that's just the beginning of the movie. There is still much more to see. 
|
|
|
|
|
kishhr wrote: 4. I can understand by the name you have kept itself, you are sick spammer, the real person who post the article try to give his full name or partial name, so that others understand who is this fellow,
What kind of name is this: Thou mewling ill-breeding pignut!
5. I strongly see you are set of spammers operating collectively, and spoiling others in code projects, Not to mention...
No, he is one of the site protectors & he's doing his duty[^](Finding suspicious items too)
kishhr wrote: 6. Since you said there are site admin looking after this, i just wonder how they allow ppl. like you giving such crappy names to your account.
 Why? Aspdotnetdev is fine. And it's up to him. These names are just like nick names.
thatrajaNobody remains a virgin, Life screws everyone
|
|
|
|
|
If he is site protector simply say with proper evidence, i clearly said, even he also said we track IP, and then talk with solid evidence, no such stuffs are happening,
meanwhile seeing people like you, who are putting nose in everyones work and trying to enjoy......
Talk if you have proper stuffs, the kind of damridge it causes not you are anybody will repay for it.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before commenting i have done enough googling, i know which is what, first it came from his end not mine, try to understand and comment not just like that, you might be president of your nation, nobody cares when there mistakes were held accountable...
Before making comment understand complete story..................
|
|
|
|
|
Here is one more article mentioned by Rahman:
[^]
This also has highest rating, i have to congrajulate him as he is not stucked to spammers like you, than his article.
The rating are 200+, comments are made daily 3-4 hours gap, thought you guys say this also spam as some pattern there,
I strongly recommend code project to remove sick spammers like you as good articles are losing it's value
|
|
|
|
|
Added to the suspicious nature of the votes, every one of the "5" votes was created the same day, and each of them has left a total of 1 message... on this article. That's not just suspicious, that is just ludicrous. Perhaps this is a situation where Chris needs to have one of his "chats" with this OP after checking out the internal statistics on the 5 vote accounts.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Cut the guy a break. It's totally possible that two people with the same uncommon last name would create an account on the same day just to upvote his article, one after the other. Just like it is possible that all the molecules of air in a room might all decide to go to one corner of the room at the same time, causing the occupant to suffocate. Totally possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miracles[^] do happen...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Who would define a solution expert? One of the great things about the article rating system is that it's a democracy - everyone gets a chance to have a say, and if an article is good then it doesn't need an "expert" to say so. A good article is one that educates someone - it shouldn't matter whether or not the person reading it is an expert, at the end of the article, they should be able to say "I get it. I see how this was put together. Very clever."
Or do you think that only a supposed expert should be clever enough to understand an article? If so, you've just decided that articles shouldn't be available for everyone. Should we have tests to see if someone's clever enough to read an article.
|
|
|
|
|
I dono how it is benfiting you or someone my friend, what i am saying is if you say i wanna be judge, you should have fair understanding on subject, in a reality show you have seen, the people who score are mainly judges, not anyone just like that,
Here one more thing is he want to abuse me purposefully and made some comments which led to so many unwanted conversation and replies
|
|
|
|
|
kishhr wrote: if you say i wanna be judge, you should have fair understanding on subject
Turn that round. Surely, by the end of your article you should have enough understanding of what the article is about to be able to judge it. If I don't understand your article at the end, then the problem is with the article. There's an old adage:
"If the learner hasn't learnt, the teacher hasn't taught."
Think about it.
Don't take criticism personally - at the end of the day, why does it matter to you what someone else thinks or says about your article? Do you use it to improve as an author, or do you sit in a corner and sulk. My first articles stunk, and fortunately people were kind enough to give me criticism - that has helped me to grow as an author and I'd like to think my later efforts are much better. The important thing to try and do is understand why people have commented the way they did, and to take that and use it to improve.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not bothered with comment, someone said wow, some other had different opinion, the main thing is the topic is very broad, and embedding within article is a challenge, i made ppl. to familarize with many stuffs there, i have also given explaination of why it's presented like that.
What i didn't liked is he says you you have fabricated the comments, that's not a fair comment, different ppl. will have different perspective, what i see, you may not see, or vice versa, the article has be written keep diverse set of audience in mind and try to give max. converage to get them familiar with stuffs
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone get angry if someone comments or rates without any proper base, this has everything what it needs
|
|
|
|
|
It might be my first article presented but i have seen so many articles and have written with understanding of it's all plus and flaws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
What is wrong with that? Windows has a built-in feature of being able to recover an account when you have forgotten your password. The nice thing is that if somebody else does it you will know because your password will have changed. In fact, I needed to do this once, but was able to recover my password because it was saved when I used remote desktop from one computer to another.
This could be a very useful article/tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that makes sense then.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
