C#

jrahma wrote:

My watermark is not showing error AND not showing
the watermark either!

Wes Aday wrote:

The code that you have posted works perfectly fine on my system.

Richard Andrew x64 wrote:

Works on My Machine

Quote:

To use this API, you must provide a manifest specifying Comclt32.dll version 6.0. For more information on manifests, see Enabling Visual Styles.

public static Tuple<double, double> Test(Double Val1, Double Val2, Double Val3)
{
    Double Test_Val = Val1 + Val2 + Val3;
    Double Test_2 = 7;
    return new Tuple<double, double>(Test_Val, Test_2);
}

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    Double A = 1, B = 2, C = 3;
    Tuple<double,double> Result = Test(A, B, C);
    Console.WriteLine("{0} {1}", Result.Item1 , Result.Item2 );
    Console.ReadLine();
}

Wayne Gaylard wrote:

A tuple is a reference object, so you need to create one using the new keyword.

var result = new Tuple<Double, Double, Double>(a, b, c);
return new Tuple<Double, Double>(test_val, test_2);

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;

namespace TestingFunctions
{
    class Program
    {
        public static Tuple<double, double> Test(double value1, double value2, double value3)
        {
            double result1 = value1 + value2 + value3;
            double result2 = 7;
            return new Tuple(result1, result2);
        }
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            double a = 1, b = 2, c = 3;
            Tuple result = Test(a, b, c);
            Console.WriteLine("{0}", result);
        }
    }
}

BillWoodruff wrote:

For this reason, I voted your response a #1

public class Result
{
    public double FirstNumber { get; set; }
    public double SecondNumber { get; set; }
    public double ThirdNumber { get; set; }
    // And you can create more ....
}

public static Result Do(params double[] numbers)
{
    Result result = new Result();

    result.FirstNumber = numbers[0] - numbers[1];

    foreach (double number in numbers)
        result.SecondNumber += number;
    
    return result;
}

private Tuple<CheckState, DateTime, string, decimal> _fourTuple;

private void SaveTupleButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    _fourTuple = Tuple.Create
    (
        checkBox1.CheckState,
        dateTimePicker1.Value,
        textBox1.Text, 
        numericUpDown1.Value
    );
}

private void SaveTupleButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    _fourTuple = new Tuple<CheckState, DateTime, string, decimal>
    (
        checkBox1.CheckState,
        dateTimePicker1.Value,
        textBox1.Text, 
        numericUpDown1.Value
    );
}

private void RestoreTupleClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    checkBox1.CheckState = _fourTuple.Item1;
    dateTimePicker1.Value = _fourTuple.Item2;
    textBox1.Text = _fourTuple.Item3;
    numericUpDown1.Value = _fourTuple.Item4;
}

struct State
{
  public CheckState Value;
  public DateTime When;
  public string By;
  public decimal Amount;
}

Quote:

I am still eager to here how you use anonymous classes

"Anonymous classes handle most of these cases and cleaner in my opinion.
Who knows what Item0 and Item1 and Item2 is?"

public class Pair<T>
{
    private T first;
    private T second;

    public Pair(T first, T second)
    {
        this.first = first;
        this.second = second;
    }

    public T First { get { return first; } }
    public T Second { get { return second; } }
}

public static Double Test(Double Val1, Double Val2, Double Val3)
{
    Double Test_Val = Val1 + Val2 + Val3;
    Double Second_Test = Test_Val % 2;
    return new Pair<Double>(Test_Val, Second_Test);
}

public static Double Test(Double Val1, Double Val2, Double Val3, out Double secondResult)
{
    Double Test_Val = Val1 + Val2 + Val3;
    secondResult = Test_Val % 2;
    return Test_Val;
}