|
I'm happy to make the change to ditching the extension, though I can't see how it affects anything other than sensibilities. We made the decision many, many years ago to have extensions on messages, but with the newer SEO friendly URLs on articles we took the chance to ditch them. If you were in charge of a site that had many, many inbound links, how willing would you be to change the URLs of those inbound links for a purely cosmetic reason? It can be done, and reasonably easily, but what would the total effect be?
As to the second issue, the forum that the message takes you to has text above it saying 'Discussions on this specific version of this article". So the permalink took you to exactly the place it should have: the specific version of that article.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: the forum that the message takes you to has text above it saying 'Discussions on this specific version of this article"
That depends, actually. If I go to the latest version of the article, I see a forum with the header "Comments and Discussions" and no explanatory text. Now, if I click the permalink button on my message, I am directed to the specific version of the article, and then the explanatory text says "Discussions on this specific version of this article. Add your comments on how to improve this article here. These comments will not be visible on the final published version of this article." Also, I only ever see one forum. Should there be a second forum that is version agnostic?
Chris Maunder wrote: It can be done, and reasonably easily, but what would the total effect be?
Perceived better professionalism. Keeping things consistent helps your brand. Can you tell I work in a marketing department? 
Also, if you go extensionless now, you can always change the technology later (e.g., to MVC) and not worry about changing it again (well, unless that technology requires an extension).
And if you do remove the extension, you may want to consider doing an HTTP 301 redirect from the old extensions. That way, search engines will point to the new location and you avoid having two sets of valid links to the same content (a situation that can harm your SEO).
Chris Maunder wrote: If you were in charge of a site that had many, many inbound links, how willing would you be to change the URLs of those inbound links for a purely cosmetic reason?
Depends. I have tons of free time to do this, right? Just like you? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
If an error occurs while loading a file (happened to me with png file) you cannot attempt to load the same file merely because of the file name, even though it reported an error in the first attempt. You end up having to rename the file after each attempt.
|
|
|
|
|
A known and annoying issue. I will put this on the bug list.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks... 
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: annoying
Very annoying. I have seen similar issues on other websites, and one gave the error 'message' "Ummmmmmmmmmmmm..... It seems there was an error, and an error occurred in the error handler. This has not been a good day."
A short time later, the website went kaboom. All of the servers (60 I think) had crashed at the same instant, and most of the website data was lost. From what I found out, they were on Windows Server 2003, and it was 2011 when the crash happened. I think they upgraded after that.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Unexpected error during upload. One or more files may not have been uploaded.
When loading png files to an tip article (less than 640 pixels; significantly less than 1MB). Not sure why it's not allowing me to load it, as you can see the error is not very descriptive. Using IE9 (work pc).
[edit] Just tried a jpg of the same picture and it didn't work either. 
modified 20-Aug-12 16:51pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Which article?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to make it short and sweet yet look good since I'm going to link it from another site for customer reference.
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried it from Firefox 14 and it worked from there...
|
|
|
|
|
Answers in QA are being displayed as if a dozen or more blank lines have been added to them. It makes for a lot of scrolling.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris said that he would be posting a fix in a bit.
Why is common sense not common?
Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level where they are an expert.
Sometimes it takes a lot of work to be lazy
Please stand in front of my pistol, smile and wait for the flash - JSOP 2012
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
You're using Chrome?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like it was a result of the recent site update. Code just took a while to spool up. Working fine for me now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you try Ctrl+F5? That may kick things.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried yelling at it?
cheers,
Chris "No stone unturned" Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
They aren't appearing in IE9 either.
|
|
|
|
|
They are appearing fine in Chrome for me.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
