|
Try the following query.
SELECT CASE WHEN COUNT(File_Name)=0 THEN 1 ELSE COUNT(File_Name) END as FileName from tblname
WHERE (File_Name = @File_Name1)
|
|
|
|
|
if v want to store name like Mohammed's then sql didn't allow to save data and give an error
|
|
|
|
|
Only goes wrong if you concatenate strings, which shouldn't be done in the first place. Use a 'parameterized query';
using (cmd = new MySqlCommand("SELECT EmployeeName FROM Employees WHERE EmployeeId = @P1;"))
{
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@P1", Parameter1);
m.ExecuteNonQuery();
}
Research the AddWithValue member.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
to store name like Mohammed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi ,
When i run this Stored Procedure I get this error :
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 1<br />
Incorrect syntax near 'Pages'.
AND my SP is :
declare @ModuleSettings NVarChar(max) = N'<Article type=''Pages''><Ucl name=''~/UserControls/ModuleSettings/ArticleModuleSettings.ascx''></Ucl><Election>0</Election><IsPaging>False</IsPaging><PageSize>5</PageSize><PagingLocation>Top</PagingLocation><Title>توليد کنندگان مواد اوليه / Suppliers of raw materials</Title><ThumbNail location=''3''>True</ThumbNail><ContentTitle>True</ContentTitle><ContentAbbr>True</ContentAbbr><Icon address=''''>False</Icon><Category>429</Category><All><item align="right" visible="true" order="1" block="true" navigateUrl="~/Management/Modules/Details/">Title</item><item align="right" visible="true" order="2" block="true">Abbr</item><item align="left" visible="true" order="4" block="true">CreateDate</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="5" block="false">Content</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="6" block="false">Keyword</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="7" block="false">Category</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="8" block="false">File</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="9" block="false">Icon</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="10" block="false">writer</item><item align="right" visible="false" order="11" block="false">Source</item></All></Article>'
declare @param nvarchar(max)= N'update [Management].[PageModules] set '
if 100 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[AreaId]=''' + cast(100 as nvarchar(3)) + ''','
End
if @ModuleSettings is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[ModuleSettings]=''' + @ModuleSettings + ''','
END
if 0 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[Election]=''' + cast(0 as nvarchar(3)) + ''','
End
if 'sdfg' is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[Title]=''' + 'sdfg' + ''','
End
if 418 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[CategoryId]=''' + cast(418 as nvarchar(17)) + ''','
End
if NULL is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[DepartmentId]=''' + cast(NULL as nvarchar(9)) + ''','
End
if 38 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[CultureId]=''' + cast(38 as nvarchar(5)) + ''','
End
if 15 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[ModuleId]=''' + cast(15 as nvarchar(5)) + ''','
End
if 1 is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[PageId]=''' + cast(1 as nvarchar(9)) + ''','
End
set @param= substring(@param,0,len(@param))
set @param = @param + ' Where Id=''' + cast( 68 as nvarchar(17)) + ''' '
exec sp_executesql @param
modified 6-Nov-12 4:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
Change this;
N'<Article type=''Pages''>
to this;
N'<Article type="Pages">
..and do the same for the "ucl name".
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Building a dynamic query in SQL, even inside a stored procedure, will not prevent SQL injection[^].
Your example could easily be rewritten as a simple UPDATE statement. (NB: Constant values like 100 are never null!) If any of the new values are passed in as parameters, then your query is open to SQL injection.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Please help ..
Solutions are not usefull!
but its SP and for example i fill info in that!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I my Self solved the problem via this strategy
Change the bellow code :
if @ModuleSettings is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[ModuleSettings]=''' + <code>@ModuleSettings</code> + ''','
END
With :
if @ModuleSettings is not NULL
BEGIN
set @param = @param + '[ModuleSettings]=''' + <code>replace (@ModuleSettings,CHAR(39),char(39)+CHAR(39))</code> + ''','
End
conclusion :
you should replace :
@ModuleSettings
with :
replace (@ModuleSettings,CHAR(39),char(39)+CHAR(39))
|
|
|
|
|
I believe I've found a very unexpected bug in SQLBulkCopy that took me a while to track down. My test program reads in records from a CSV file with exactly 1 column which is defined as a "numeric(19,5)" for statistical uploads.
Condition 1:
If the input file has 25 rows with the only value being the digit zero, followed by a number with a decimal (like '1.23456'), the data is imported perfectly.
Condition 2:
If the input file has 26 rows with the only value being the digit zero (or any non-decimal number), followed by a number with a decimal (like '1.23456'), the data is imported and the last (and any subsequent) rows have the field imported with truncated decimal digits (like '1.00000').
Condition 3:
If the input file has 26 rows and the first row is '0.0', all of the rows are imported perfectly.
I've checked the table/field definition for Condition 2 and it's the same as 1 and 3 so there's no manipulation of the field type (as far as I can tell).
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
You say the test file has "1 column".
Then you say that each row has "the digit zero, followed by a number with a decimal (like '1.23456'),"
Does that mean that it has two columns or that the single number is '01.23456'?
Also you should post the following
1. What database version you are using.
2. Example data
3. The relevant code.
4. The database schema you using.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: the numbers
The test only had a single column although I first noticed the behavior with 100 columns. Each row only has 1 value (zero) until the 27th row which is the decimal number, i.e.
0
0
0
...
0
1.23456
Re: other questions
1) The destination was SQL Server 2008 and the SQLBulkCopy came from the .Net 4.5 library. This brings up the question "Is the SQLBulkCopy the culprit or the destination SQL Server instance?"
2) Example data: see above
3) Relevant code
using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(strConn))
{
connection.Open();
using (SqlBulkCopy bulkCopy = new SqlBulkCopy(connection))
{
bulkCopy.DestinationTableName = strSQL_table_name;
bulkCopy.BatchSize = GetBulkCopySize();
bulkCopy.BulkCopyTimeout = 2000;
bulkCopy.NotifyAfter = GetNotifyAfter();
bulkCopy.SqlRowsCopied += new SqlRowsCopiedEventHandler(OnSqlRowsCopied);
try
{
bulkCopy.WriteToServer(results);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
string error = ex.Message;
MessageBox.Show("Error(CSV_To_SQL-a): " + ex.Message);
return;
}
4) single column in a table, name="BigNumeric", data type="numeric(18,5)
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the reader ('results') close?
|
|
|
|
|
I presume results is a datatable, have you inspected the content of the table before BC?
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
As it turns out, the process still isn't working. The .Clone() didn't work so I tried the .FillSchema() method and it's failing too.
adapter.FillSchema(table, SchemaType.Source);
table.Columns[2].DataType = typeof (Int32);
adapter.Fill(table);
The column still gets cast as an Int32 from FillSchema(), then I try to change it to typeof(Decimal) followed by Fill() and the decimal points are still truncated in the resulting DataTable. I even tried to set the DataType to String but that didn't work either.
Next I've discovered another practically hidden Microsoft "feature" called TypeGuessRows (and IMEX=1) which supposedly can be modified in the registry or the OleDbConnection string. I haven't gotten it to work yet but at least I know that others have seen this behavior too.
|
|
|
|
|
Keep your column in an numeric format OR convert it manually in numeric format so it dont create destruction.
|
|
|
|
|
[NM] this[^] and now it works
I would like to connect to my SQL Server 2005 instance running on my Windows Server 2003 at home from my office. I'v never tried this before, so bear with me...
First, I follow all the instructions here[^]
I then open SSMS an another PC and attempt to connect to my IP, which fails with
"A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections.
Do I need to do something at my router page to allow access to the server? If so, what?
What else could be wrong??
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
modified 11-Oct-12 17:44pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You'll have to ensure that all the right ports you need are open in the router and make sure that the SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Do keep in mind that there are people out there who are running portscans in their free time. You might find strange things happening in your database if you hook it up to the internet without some precautions;
Set the thing to "Windows Authentication" and turn the SA-account of. There could be a checklist on Google, didn't check that - but you might want to 
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
When your server is behind the router, then it has a "private" IP address, hasn't it? Then things get complicated. You could create a VPN, such that home and office are virtually in the same network (same range of IP addresses), or you have to configure port forwarding on your router. I cannot give details on how to do that...
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Readers,
Above question is a "small" question about something I'm at a dead end at the moment. How do I design a database to store all kind of addresses from all over the world? All countries have different address specifications. Some countries have more address fields than others, and/or of different structure.
This is just a fraction of a larger problem I'm facing. I need to redesign a database that is country specific to a global design. Addresses might be the most easy thing to globalize.
How do you design/model such a "global" database?
Thanks in advance,
Rémy Samulski
|
|
|
|
|
Cool problem.
The answer is to normalize properly.
One table for countries. One for address types, such as delivery addresses or box addresses and so on, per country.
One for address parts with one row per street housenumber, town, zip and so on.
Another one for holding the combination of addressparts and addresstypes, with ordering, or rather placement on the letter.
You'll need one table to hold the addresses as an entity, with an address type reference, not the actual data.
This table could of course be combined with a person or company if that's fitting, but I woud split it as a company might have more than one address.
And lastly one for holding the actual data with one row per address_type_part and address.
Make a model of this and check if I've forgotten anything.
modified 11-Oct-12 6:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: street, housenumber
Street and housenumber are a single fact, one entity. You will not use them as separate facts in the database, and it makes little sense to add an extra field for this.
On topic; there are houses without a number on Curacao
Bastard Programmer from Hell
if you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
assumed