|
I wrote the article:
jQuery UI Alerts Dialog using ThemeRollers[^]
Over the last year I received a lot of comments which lead me to create jqAlert[^] as well as make several updates. My thought was to write another article but this time only detailing it's use. I am wondering though if it would just be best to write updates to this article or to create a whole new?
I don't to break or violate any guidelines and appreciate any input on this. Since I have had nothing but positive experience from the articles I have done so far I don't mind writing a new article. 
The updates I am making are hopefully going to be finished before the end of this year.
Thanks in advance.
as if the facebook, twitter and message boards weren't enough - blogged
|
|
|
|
|
I can see from your previous article you have a talent for writing for CodeProject so no worries there. 
Typically articles are more "this is how this works and how I made it" rather than "this is how you use it," but I have faith you'll be able to navigate that line well.
As long as there's a local copy of the code (we're more than happy to have one to the github as well) I think it should do great. I'd be happy to give a look over it at any stage as well if you want guideline feedback. Looking forward to it!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I forgot to apologize for your reply...
I finally finished the new article this weekend and submitted yesterday afternoon. I am about to start another article.
I am thinking my next round will end up being a series of articles based on the following site that I am working on:
http://dooscrib.com/[^]
Right now it's just a basic shell of drawing pad but it works on desktop and mobile devices.
as if the facebook, twitter and message boards weren't enough - blogged
|
|
|
|
|
That's cool
We look forward to that article as well!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I am about to post my first article here as part of our class project and similar to me other 8 or 9 groups in my class are also supposed to put their C# Class projects here.
The Projects are made by groups of students, now HOW to add Co-authors in articles so that the whole group gets the credit instead of only a single guy, also we are supposed to put out teacher's name as co-author as well.
I can't figure out what the Member ID is, how to add it and my friend tried adding member username on his article: Mouse Control via Webcam[^] and failed to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
The Member ID is the value that appears about the member's image in their member profile.
eg. View my profile[^] and above my pic is "Member No. 1". "1" is my member ID.
Just use the member Id of your fellow authors.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I recently updated my article at:
ExpTreeLib Version 3 - Explorer-like Navigation and Operation for your Forms[^]
The major parts of the update were new versions of the article Source and Demo downloads.
I obviously did not understand how to upload new versions of these zips. I uploaded the new zips with new names (indicating the version differences). In my note to the editor, I pointed out that I had new versions of the zips, but that does not seem to enough.
The article text has changed, but the download links are still pointing to the old versions of the zips.
How can I fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Jim,
I think I saw the updated files and have changed them, please let me know if those are the correct ones.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, that has accomplished almost all of what is needed.
The almost part is that the Fourth download link should be removed since it points to the older version of the Demo download.
The line/link to remove reads "Download demo Project - 81.5 KB".
Jim
|
|
|
|
|
No problem Jim, all fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the fixup. All is good now
I do have a question though.
If I want to update the download files, how do I do it correctly using the Wizard?
I rather suspect that my problem was caused by "Add Files" when my new files did not have the same name as the files they were to replace. Is this a correct suspicion?
I am inclined to think that there is some virtue in having different versions have a version marker in the name to distinguish them from the old, but if that causes problems, then I could (probably) live with it.
Jim
|
|
|
|
|
If you update them by the same name, the old files should be replaced after you hit "Publish." If you use a new file name, I would recommend deleting the existing files from the HTML (you can from the article too if you want) and upload the new files, hit the "Add selected zip files to article". If you didn't delete the files from the article you will have to remove the entries you don't want from the HTML. This little entry may help:
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
If you have further questions please let me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there,
Is it allowed to post an article containing a video ?
This could be an a youtube-hosted video that should show on a rectangular area, not an hypertext link.
Thanks.
Push Framework - now released !
http://www.pushframework.com
|
|
|
|
|
You won't be able to put a link in your YouTube video in an article yourself. But I'd be happy to review the article and the YouTube link if you email them to me. (I can put them YouTube videos into articles for you)
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean,
I'm working on the article,
I will send it to you when completed.
Push Framework - now released !
http://www.pushframework.com
|
|
|
|
|
Place the keyword CodeProject within the <category> element that is the direct child of <channel>. This marks all items within the channel as consumable.
Place the CodeProject keyword within the <category> element that is the direct child of an <item>. This marks just the one item as consumable.
Eranda
|
|
|
|
|
For a blogspot blog the best route might be to use a Rel-Tag per post as described here: Code Project Technical Blog FAQ[^]
If you have any questions or run into any problems please let me know and I'd be happy to help.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
A few months ago I wrote this:
ElmahR = ELMAH + SignalR
The article is quickly getting obsolete because the project kept on evolving, I'm keeping its content updated only in the "History" section, but basically I'm planning to rewrite it from scratch in order to reflect the project status. What would you recommend in this case? Do the rewrite in place, releasing an updated version of the same article, or writing a new one with a new title on the same topic (but with pretty different content)?
Thanks
Wasp
|
|
|
|
|
I would update the article in-place. The revision history is available for those curious as to what went on before.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks, will do.
Cheers,
Wasp
|
|
|
|
|
It says on my Technical Blog Feeds page that blogs are polled for new content every hour, yet it hasn't polled the one I posted three days ago (Friday 9 November), though it is tagged "CodeProject" as per instructions, and is on top of the feed[^].
The previous article, posted October 17th, also went unnoticed for many days. Neither then nor now did clicking on the the "Update now" graphic do anything.
Would be grateful to know if polling frequency has been turned way down, or if there is somethign I can do to speed things up.
Cheers,
Orjan
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, it was polled in last night. So 3.5 days or so between polling?
|
|
|
|
|
Orjan Westin wrote: So 3.5 days or so between polling
Depends on load.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
not even one replies to my question posted 2 days ago. :/
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
