|
I had to log in in order to see all the messages of every forum. Otherwhise there were just a very few amount of messages, soapbox 3 messages. Is it just me??
|
|
|
|
|
By default, only 10 messages are displayed. At some point you will have changed this when you are logged in, which is why you see a difference between the none logged in and the logged in behaviour.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I noticed. But to see one folder totaly empty is strange.
|
|
|
|
|
That just means no one has posted there in a while. There's a default time limit as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, last week my debator rep got instantly down to -156.
And on my profile:
Messages - 25(Under water)
Will any admin fix this?
|
|
|
|
|
There was a reputation recalculation in the last couple of weeks that "aligned" the various sources of reputation. I suspect you've been caught by this.
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon did not write:"There was a reputation recalculation randomization in the last couple of weeks months that "aligned" the various sources of reputation recalculated your reputation based on a numerlogical analysis ... based on the principles of Kabbalistic gematria ... of all your posts to date. I suspect you've been caught by this. You should be honored to have been signaled out for the very special status of a negative reputation, which is of much greater value than many bloated "positive" reputations here, on such forums as Q&A. yrs, Bill
"What do humans depend on: words ! We're suspended in language: we can never say what's up: or, down. We must communicate experience and ideas, but in ways that do not become ambiguous, and lose objectivity.
For parallels to quantum theory: we must turn to psychology, or to paradoxes thinkers like Buddha and Lao Tzu illuminated, examining reality, as both observer, and actor, in human life's small-scale micro-cosmic drama."
Niels Bohr, 1937
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh Bill. You read my subtext with such grace.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway, I want really you go fix my random negative reputation. I should be already with OVER NINE THOUSAND 500 points without this randomization without grace recalcution.I don't fell honred. It's like a pie in my face.
E: Also my debator reputation won't grow anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck with getting me to fix your reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, I reckon you can fix it. You can fix it real good.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
The issue is down to the fact that there's nothing there that can act as a natural word wrap point. As that part is so long, it just won't wrap.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this can be done like css property as in C# (word-break: break all;).
Sisir
Software Developer
skypeID: mfsi_sisir
sisirpatro@gmail.com
08093022771
|
|
|
|
|
What you are thinking of (in CSS) is:
word-wrap: break-word; And I am well aware of this feature.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I know the feature word-wrap: break-word;
But I had the same issue in my project and
word-breaK: break-all; resolved the problem of hiding the word content. So I shared my experience with you... 
Sisir
Software Developer
skypeID: mfsi_sisir
sisirpatro@gmail.com
08093022771
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: As that part is so long, it just won't wrap.
So, if any word gets hided just because it is long, then it is one issue I guess.
We should show it on next line, if it exceeds the vertical bar, what say?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. I was just telling you what the cause of the problem was.
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, thanks.
So, this is an issue and you are going to work on it, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Tadit Dash wrote: So, this is an issue
Yes
Tadit Dash wrote: you are going to work on it, right?
No. The Code Project team might, but I won't be.
|
|
|
|
|
ok. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
|
"The report action was successfull"
If you get an email telling you that you can catch Swine Flu from tinned pork then just delete it. It's Spam.
|
|
|
|
|
I went to vote on a post (Need help about password idea...[^]
) and got "Someone at your IP address has already voted for this item.", but I hadn't (yet). Besides, you probably shouldn't be storing the IP address anyway because it's not very useful in identifying users.
|
|
|
|
|
Same with me, looks like the message is given if someone already voted first.
Why have this restriction anyway, shouldn't I be able to vote a second time to change my first one.
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
Same. 
Bob Dole The internet is a great way to get on the net.
2.0.82.7292 SP6a
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
