|
Ahhh the sound of one hand clapping.
|
|
|
|
|
I just thought of upvoting this! Not sure what force did this!
|
|
|
|
|
|
This it the wrong forum, I just wonder if you did want to post it here.
This forum is for "Weird and Wonderful" programming stuff. What you have here is certainly weird, it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
It doesn't look like an efficient weapon to me, it is too compact for one thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Keith,
I wanted to post it different forum. But realized it just after pressing the submit button. Is it possible to move this topic to General Indian Topic forum?
Regards,
Prasad P. Khandekar
Knowledge exists, man only discovers it.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't know, you could ask in "Site Bugs and Suggestions". You can't move it yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank's Keith. I will try to contact Siteadmin.
Regards,
Prasad P. Khandekar
Knowledge exists, man only discovers it.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: it looks lie nothing more than a stone sex toy or possibly a highly stylised penis penetrating an extremely stylised, well ladypart.
Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here. Though it might be posted in wrong forum but comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
|
|
|
|
|
Tushar321 wrote: Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here
Where do you get off telling me what to do?
The right to free speech is more important the the right to not be offended, and it simply does look like a sex toy. In fact, when I first opened the article I thought it was a sex toy.
I'm not commenting further as this will go downhill very quickly and we will never agree.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: we will never agree.
Sure we will... we just did...
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Where do you get off telling me what to do?
The right to free speech
Oh, the irony. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Shut up, right 
|
|
|
|
|
Fine. 
It always cracks me up to see someone essentially tell someone else, "Don't you dare tell me what to do. I have free speech." The irony always kills me. I doubt you meant that but it could be viewed by some that way.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeh, the irony isn't lost on me either, a bit like liberal opposition to extremist groups.
I don't have problem him getting upset I what I said or expressing his view, more the expectation that I should modify my behaviour to suit.
|
|
|
|
|
"This forum is purely for amusement." I suppose your original post qualifies.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
okay Keith my bad
I guess I am too young to understand all this 
Do not go where the path may lead. Go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.
|
|
|
|
|
Tushar321 wrote: comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy is really unnecessary.
Why? The whole point to a free exchange of ideas in a public forum is that people express what they really think, not to censor their thoughts and words by what someone else may not agree with. Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: that people express what they really think
Which is what Tushar321 did.
Quote: Don't be so sensitive about stuff like this.
Agreed. Anyone who cares what strangers on a public forum say need to reevaluate their priorities.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
ryanb31 wrote: Which is what Tushar321 did.
All too correct. 
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Tushar321 wrote: Dear Keith can you please show little respect in here.
You're in the wrong place - that is not going to happen.
Tushar321 wrote: comparing a sacred devotional thing (though for some communities) with a sex toy
is really unnecessary.
No, it's completely necessary: any religion or belief that is so fragile that it can't handle a little irreverence deserves all it gets. Besides, it does look like some sort of freaky sex toy.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
As I'm not going to click the link, how else would I know what it looks like?
|
|
|
|
|
Prasad Khandekar wrote: Any thoughts.
You need help?
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prasad Khandekar wrote: Is it just a symbol or more.
IMO every symbol is automatically a bit more than a symbol - because it symbolizes something (a warning, an opinion or beliefs). Although I do not really think that it could be a highly efficient weapon...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
