|
Recently we implemented content filtering based on the Newsletter setting in your profile.
I found a potential issue that may have affected how content is filtered, but I still think that you should have gotten content. Please send me a copy of the Newsletter next week if you have any problems.
Also, you have a LOT of tags in your Newsletter Topic setting. If you clear the tags, you will get everything. You may be missing interesting content just because the author did not tag it the way you would. You also do not have the News, Weekly Pool, and Popular Content checked for inclusion. You are missing some great content as a result.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I've cleared all the tags and selected all the newsletter features, so hopefully next week's newsletter should be OK.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
When I visit an article that has subsequently been edit, I get presented with;
"You have a new draft version. Would you like to view or edit it?"
However, if the user is not the author of the article, would it not be better to change the wording to;
"There is a new draft version. Would you like to view or edit it?"
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds sensible. Consider it done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Morning Chris,
I noticed your attempt to implement this, but it doesn't look like it quite went right. I went into an aticle this morning and it said "There is", but the rest of the sentence and the links were missing.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
The fix was fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
... seems to be truncated or not filled in correctly it's showing 0 updated and added articles.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Mehdi,
I meant to drop you a message on your articels at the weekend, but got side tracked and just remember just now when I noticed your name. Anyway, on your articles they often start with a long list of download versions. This in my opinion detracts from the quality of the articles.
Can I suggest the promonent 1st download link is the current version with the icon etc., and then the older versions are simply put into a table of version numbers only, e.g.
Latest Release:
icon decription/link/version number/file size etc.
Previous Releases:
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 etc.
2.0 2.1 2.2
It would just make the start of the article look better. Alternatively, put the links to the older versions with the version history at the bottom. As there probably be very few people need them now.
Cheers,
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Dave!
That is a great idea, I have always had a nagging feeling about the long list at the top!
I will update the articles in the next iteration.
Its the man, not the machine - Chuck Yeager
If at first you don't succeed... get a better publicist
If the final destination is death, then we should enjoy every second of the journey.
|
|
|
|
|
We've recently implemented filtering content in Newsletters based on the Newsletter Topics members select in the Newsletters tab of their settings. If your selected topics settings is to narrow and there is no content tagged with matching tags, you will not see any content.
To get the most information daily, I recommend removing all of your filters and you will see all the content.
Matthew Dennis
|
|
|
|
|
The asp.net multiple file upload drag and drop with progress bar in html 5 is not getting downloaded. The page is only redirecting and download is not starting. Kindly correct these errors n rply.
Here is the url to the user control:
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=460142&av=669590
modified 24-Jun-13 1:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I updated my article a few days ago, in order to use new binaries (version 8.0) to replace the old ones (version 7.5).
From the Article Submission Wizard, I can see the new binaries are ready. But once published, the old binaries remain for no reason.
Is this a bug of Code Project? The article I am referring to is
An introduction to #SNMP, an Open Source SNMP implementation[^]
#SNMP, http://sharpsnmplib.codeplex.com
|
|
|
|
|
You have to update the actual links in your article (there's a link at the top of the list of zip files that, if clicked, does this for you).
(I fixed it for you)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
CP does tweet an article. Good 
However, if the author has a Twitter tag then it should be included in the Tweet.
Make it simple, as simple as possible, but not simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Tibi wrote: Twitter tag
#tag or @name?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
@Name I meant
You are collecting this info anyway and displaying it on the article, so it should be part of the tweet.
Make it simple, as simple as possible, but not simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but when you tweet about something you arne't necessarily tweeting at the author. You may simply be tweeting about the author's article to your friends.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You are saying "Article by John Smith" the Twitter community convention when you do that is "Article by @JohnSmith"
Make it simple, as simple as possible, but not simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, OK. I get it.
I'll add this to the TODO.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
When copying a blog post, the copied post at CP still refers to the pictures of the original article. So, if the original blog is down or the url of the page and images have changed then the article will still appear on CP but without pictures.
The suggestion is to also copy the pictures.
Make it simple, as simple as possible, but not simpler.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
