|
So, those would still be molar teeth. I've heard those are the ones to get infected quickly since toothbrush may not be able to effectively reach there to clean unless enough care is exercised regularly.
I'd still recommend just taking the pain and getting the procedure done with local anesthesia instead of using general (full body) anesthesia.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Wanted to save my IE9 Favorites at work. (only "approved" browser)
Looked at the export and what does it say "NETSCAPE-Bookmark", since I was using a product called Microsoft Internet Explorer and exporting "Favorites" this seems a bit odd. Especially since I have used Netscape in the past.
You got to love a company too lazy to either make their own or re-brand what they bought.
It also says that the file I manually exported is an automatically generated file???
|
|
|
|
|
djj55 wrote: It also says that the file I manually exported is an automatically generated file??? The action was manual, and resulted in a generated file.
It collects your bookmarks and turns it into a HTML-file?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: turns it into a HTML-file?
Correct. However here is the header.
|
|
|
|
|
djj55 wrote:
Looked at the export and what does it say "NETSCAPE-Bookmark"
<!DOCTYPE NETSCAPE-Bookmark-file-1>
It says the document is a netscape bookmark file, a standard of sorts used by browsers to share bookmarks based on Netscape's method of storing bookmarks.
It is not saying that it contains Netscape bookmarks.
As for the automatically generated file, well, it was.
Unless you typed it yourself, in which case why did you type in that you had automatically generated it?
“I believe that there is an equality to all humanity. We all suck.” Bill Hicks
|
|
|
|
|
You sir are correct.
But it would seem more appropriate to say it was a Microsoft list of favorites.
|
|
|
|
|
djj55 wrote: But it would seem more appropriate to say it was a Microsoft list of favorites.
Go ahead, blow another standard up - It's not like Microsoft hasn't been doing this for ages
You know the world is going crazy when the best rapper is a white guy, the best golfer is a black guy, the tallest guy in the NBA is Chinese, the Swiss hold the America's Cup, France is accusing the U.S. of arrogance, Germany doesn't want to go to war, and the three most powerful men in America are named "Bush", "Dick", and "Colon."
|
|
|
|
|
Why would it be 'more appropriate' to add an extra piece of (more or less useless) info?
If you have a closer look, you'll see that as mentioned - it doesn't say that it's a list of Netscape favourites. It merely says it's using a doctype which contains the text 'NETSCAPE'
An alternative may well be a reduction in the interoperability of the browsers, for the net gain of ???
Quoting from the MSDN page [^]on the topic, "The Windows Internet Explorer Favorites file format is exactly the same as the Netscape Bookmark file format."
Try looking inside documents created by OpenOffice - I'll bet that .DOCX files produced by it have parts of the header info that are identical to those produced by MS Office. The fact that the header contains more data (than this bookmark format) allows the creator to be differentiated - but key pieces of information are still identical.
Sounds like a case of PICNIC to me!
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for specific answer. Good one.
I don't why but there is weird mentality of bashing MS amongst developer (!) community whose bread-butter majorly depends on MS products. And more often than not, it their ignorance that is highlighted at the end.
-Thanks
Thanks,
Milind
|
|
|
|
|
You could just copy contents of "Favourites" folder under your profile. Handy if you want only some of the links.
As a side note: when some large organization (not necessary MS) uses own format for something - people complain about closed standards. When reuse something else - people complain about NOT using own standards
--
"My software never has bugs. It just develops random features."
|
|
|
|
|
You did know that IE stands for "Ignorant Engineering"?, version 9.0!
|
|
|
|
|
I thought it was "Idiot Engineering"
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
S Houghtelin wrote: I thought it was "Idiot Engineering"
That was IE8! Been upgraded/downgraded?
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Hankey wrote: That was IE8!
Been upgraded/downgraded?
Degraded
It was broke, so I fixed it.
|
|
|
|
|
djj55 wrote: Looked at the export and what does it say "NETSCAPE-Bookmark" It beats the cr@p out of the way IE used to save bookmarks: as shortcuts taking up one allocation unit each.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The automatic part is them creating a file handle and closing it when done writing to disk.
|
|
|
|
|
Movie Quote Of The Day
There once was a woman who was quite begat.
She had three babies named Nat, Pat, and Tat.
She said it was fun in the breeding,
but found it was hell in the feeding,
when she saw there was no tit for Tat.
Which movie?
|
|
|
|
|
"Tis a pity she's not from Eroticon 6"
|
|
|
|
|
Postman Pat the prequel
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot me.... I can't make up an answer...
(yes|no|maybe)*
|
|
|
|
|
Titty mouse and tatty mouse doing Paris.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
SHOOT, i can do this, 'EM not sure what's UP with this quote, but I will guess Nat Pat and Tat Wild West edition
Loading signature...
. . . Please Wait . . .
|
|
|
|
|
Total Recall - before the radiation!
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
Shoot'em Up.
"Bastards encourage idiots to use Oracle Forms, Web Forms, Access and a number of other dinky web publishing tolls.", Mycroft Holmes[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|