|
the size and composition make it earth-like.
they've been finding mostly giant gas planets.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: giant gas planets
Sounds like planet populated by politicians and lawyers
Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Losinger wrote: they've been finding mostly giant gas planets
So, they finally found JSOP's ex-wife ?
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, there's way to much heat there to be my ex-wife (she has all the warmth of a glacier), but good joke. 
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
It's more like saying that west Texas is earthlike
Sent from my BatComputer via HAL 9000 and M5
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: almost certainly too hot for life
Life as we know it, that is.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like a bunch of egg-heads who will never produce anything useful are trying to appear relevant.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: That's like saying Europa is "earth-like" because it's freakin' round. But whoa up there, big fella. Europa has no atmosphere, is covered in frozen methane, and it doesn't really get any heat from the sun.
Don't trust the buggers: Europa is human life friendly and indeed highly populated. 
Veni, vidi, vici.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: If it's 2000 degrees hotter, how the f*ck does that qualify as "earth-like"?
They've been exempted from Obamacare?
|
|
|
|
|
As the only planets they have been able to detect to date have been bloody great giants identifying something that small must seem quite a feat, the description is probably straight hyperbole by the journalist hack reporting it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
As already mentioned, the composition and size made it Earth-like.
Saying something is "like" something else means that there are similarities, not the that two things are identical.
|
|
|
|
|
Because with an umbrella and a refrigerator you are set.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Looks a little ghoulish! Nice!
|
|
|
|
|
Haven't seen APOD for a while, nice to see it back! (is it like my coffee mug there all along, just didn't see it?)
|
|
|
|
|
No: don't always have time to go see what's new and then don't always consider the images worthy. I'll try to post more often as they are wondrous to behold.
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." Red Adair.
Those who seek perfection will only find imperfection
nils illegitimus carborundum
me, me, me
me, in pictures
|
|
|
|
|
For a contract role, how do you decide if the price is good? [asking for a friend]
I've "He's" kind of taken desired annual and added 50% then gone back to a day rate. Any hints would be [voice="Jim Bowen"] super, smashing, great[/voice].
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
"Did anyone wince or whistle backwards through their teeth?"
The only instant messaging I do involves my middle finger.
English doesn't borrow from other languages.
English follows other languages down dark alleys, knocks them over and goes through their pockets for loose grammar.
|
|
|
|
|
"He" hasn't yet given a price, it's a case of if the advertised amount is worth chasing.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have any experience with UK rates but I've done a lot of contracting in the states. Going through a recruiter, 35 / hr is only for rookies out of school who don't know any better but some recruiting companies will try anyway. Hourly rate in the 40s is for junior to midlevel guys. 50s & 60s are common for senior level.
Of course, that's going to vary with the skill set required. Also, don't know how your taxes work but here they can be either W2 (company withholds taxes) or 1099 (you'd better save your share, 'cause the IRS will be expecting it at the end of the year). Depending on whether or not you have a company, the latter may offer more advantages for tax deductions. The former often comes with health insurance, etc. - not from the client, but from the contracting company itself.
If you're going direct to client, figure between 90 - 125 / hr. This is what the recruiting companies charge the client, and make their money on the delta between client billing & what you agreed to. And for the record, I'm perfectly happy with them getting paid. I want them alive & kicking the next time I need a gig, so they need to turn a profit.
Whether you go direct or through an agency, much of it comes down to bargaining skills. You want a high rate, the recruiter wants it to be a low rate, and you arm wrestle until you make an agreement (many young contractors don't realize that everything in life is negotiable and simply accept the rate that the recruiter offers).
One last bit of advice. Whatever rate you agree on, take it and be happy. If you're not happy with the number, don't take the gig. Nothing screams amateur or someone you don't ever want to work with again like the guy who finds out what the margin is and then whines about his cut. Remember, everybody's gotta make a living, and if you left money on the table it's your fault, not his.
Don't know how much of this translates to the UK, but hope it helps.
|
|
|
|
|
I've never gone contract, so I'm trying to think what would be sensible. The job is £500/day and to me that sounds okay.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, I wouldn't touch a flat rate with someone else's ten foot pole. Unless you get it in writing that a day is exactly x hours, and not a minute more, you're wide open for abuse of unpaid overtime.
If they agree that a day is exactly 8 hours, then you have an hourly rate of 62.50. Okay through a recruiter, low if you're going direct (at least on this side of the pond), but either way you know exactly what you're getting paid per hour.
You also need an agreement that a) you will never work more than the agreed upon x hours per day or b) if you do, you'll be compensated at an hourly rate of x per hour.
When someone wants to pay you a day rate rather than committing to an hourly rate, it means they want you to work as many hours per day as you need to (and you know how quickly projects and scope can spiral out of control), and not be compensated any differently whether you work an 8 hour day or a week of all-nighters.
Abuse of hours is legendary in our business. Getting paid for each and every hour you work is one of the primary beneifts of working as a contractor. And it's the only kind of contract I would ever take.
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. I do contract work, and have been roped into a fixed-price job exactly once. I think I made about half of my normal rate on that one.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
That's how I learned, too. First time is on the house. Second time is a self inflicted wound.
|
|
|
|
|
Going from when I've used contractors - in the UK a 'daily rate' is agreed for a fixed number of hours. That is then paid for all hours worked.
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
