|
There was also this[^] - but to my mind, that's criminal damage!
|
|
|
|
|
|
But enough about my wife.
I have a brace of very fine looking dinners.
There will be a casserole tomorrow, but for tonight I shall roast one off.
Of course one mustn't waste anything, so the bones and stuff will be the basis of a game stock for the casserole.
Off to the Xmas Feed now, but unfortunately too much work for me to drink the rest of the day away so I suspect I shall be back here for a few more hours
Still, I got my pay rise, so happy days.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote:
But enough about my wife.
There will be a casserole tomorrow, but for tonight I shall roast one off. |
Exactly how many wives have you actually got since you can afford to roast one?
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
modified 17-Dec-13 12:28pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I will have NONE if she reads that post!
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Not if you roast her either...
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
Is now the wrong time for a 'spit-roast' reference?
speramus in juniperus
|
|
|
|
|
It's never the wrong time for a spit-roast[^] reference.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Dalek Dave wrote: I will have be NONE if she reads that post!
FTFY
|
|
|
|
|
Are there avian inhabitants remaining in Bedfordshire?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
What is better for developer, if UX designer give them fireworks file or photoshop file?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Depends.
Did you get matches as well?
|
|
|
|
|
If you're just working off the designer's "vision", then either is fine. If you're contributing to the design, then Fireworks is easier, but it's worth spending a bit of time getting used to using Photoshop - this is time that you won't have wasted.
|
|
|
|
|
That will depend massively on what is being developed, and the technology in use.
You can always deliver both, that way you're not limiting options.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
AndyInUK wrote: fireworks or photoshop
Fire-flames
|
|
|
|
|
The better not to take nothing from designers - they are dangerous people...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is (V).
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: not to take nothing
So what shall it be now?
Make up your mind!
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Fireworks, because it can automatically generate .CSS, and Images files for HTML from the actual design. Saving tones of time (Specially when you are required to reiterate through the process).
|
|
|
|
|
You're assuming that he's creating a website. That's not necessarily the case. Plus, you can do this directly in Photoshop as of CS6[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Pete O'Hanlon wrote: <layer>You're assuming that he's creating a website. That's not necessarily the case.
You are right. d'oh
But if I have a choice then I would go with Fireworks, because it's primary purpose is to create UX and Prototypes. The design changes can be implemented much more faster using Fireworks.
On the other hand, there are lot more talent and resources available for Photoshop when compared with anything else.
Also nice to know that Photoshop can export to .CSS, Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Yap it's a website. UI needs to be changed of existing website and just wondering what's the best option for front end developer. I would personally chose fireworks but like you said most of the people are more comfortable making HTML from .PSD files. But I guess, if the designers will also provide the HTML then fireworks should be good too.
|
|
|
|
|
I must say as a beginner I have used both and have found Fireworks more user-friendly(we can say its developer friendly as well)
Lets say Firework is enough to shape up anything while Photoshop will bring shine to that shape.
For starter fireworks will be easier.
Believe Yourself™
|
|
|
|
|
I have both, but am proficient in neither. Based on the few things I've tried to do, however, Fireworks is easier to use, and does things Photoshop wont - like creating vector image files. Photoshop is awesome for raster images, but Fireworks is what I've had to use to make files for use by print shops and such.
But IIRC, GIMP does both, and it's free. I've never found it to be intuitive to learn, though.
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
...with THIS[^] and THIS[^]!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant Anonymous ----- The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine Winston Churchill, 1944 ----- I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy. Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
For optimum cleansing effect the bacon soap should be mixed with small grated bacon chips for light abrasive action.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|