|
When did we become the Hindu Astrology Project?
Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't you get the memo?
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
It was written....in the stars 
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the entrails of a beef burger and saw it written in Ketchup.
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Today...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auntie has this article[^]. I think the photos are excellent.
SFW.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
The comment above one picture of a bloke climbing one handed is interesting:
"Many of the explorers do not even take the precaution of wearing a helmet. At least one is reported to have died."
Trust me. If he fell, an helmet isn't going to save him...
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Trust me. If he fell, an helmet isn't going to save him...
It should make the cleanup easier after he's dented the concrete. 
I mean if you can keep all the bits in one place...
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah - it'll just add shrapnel to the spectators problems!
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome find, the pictures are fantastic!
|
|
|
|
|
I especially like that last one in the gypsum mine. It looks almost Aliens-esque.
If there is one thing more dangerous than getting between a bear and her cubs it's getting between my wife and her chocolate.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that one is good very surreal and the fact they discovered an underground city is pretty cool. Imagine what an abandoned underground city would look like?
|
|
|
|
|
...unless its in my G&T Its just so cold and slippy.
|
|
|
|
|
...I bid on a new copy of Duke Nukem Forever on Sunday - got it for £1.29, so I thought I'd install it and have a relaxing afternoon killing things. If I had known (or remembered) that Steam was involved I might not have bothered.
Installed, and pretty painlessly for a Steam product, so I'm thinking maybe they have improved since I first met them and developed a grudge.
So...I'll run it.
Little dialog pops up: "Updating Duke Nukem Forever" - did I ask for this? No. Can I press the "Play" button? No. Is there a "cancel - leave it alone" button? No.
And what does the rest say? "Ready to launch in approximately: 2 hours 42 minutes"...
So...Steam's still cr@p then? 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Not for anything they have done but for the entire concept of having to have "permission" to play a game I purchased at a store. Steam is not "required" to play a game. It is only "required" for licensing. Thus I don't support it. end rant, oh your situation sucks too.
|
|
|
|
|
Why do all People dislike things that were so damn needed earlier?
I mean the F***, in my early gaming days i needed to dl the patch from some random site!
Now with steam 1 klick and boyakasha i got the update and can get back to Play online.
There is at least to pissibility to prevent steam from updating automatically, and updates
are made for updating, so why being angry at steam and not the developer who keeps spamming updates?
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
In my early gaming days (well, PC ones - mainframe games don't count) we didn't have the opportunity to download anything - the internet didn't really exist.
What we did have to do has hand tune AUTOEXEC.BAT and CONFIG.SYS for each game, trying to squeeze out enough upper memory to fit in the mouse driver AND the soundcard. Do I need EMM386 or HIMEM? If I use the logitech V2.112 mouse driver I can save 104 bytes, but then I don't get the middle mouse button...
It's not the updates I complain about - it's the whole way Steam decides what happens, and never, ever give you any choice. I first met it with Half Life when I still had 56K dial up - and the first, last and only thing it ever wanted to do was update Steam, never mind the game. Since it never managed to update itself without dropping the modem connection at least once and having to start over, I never got to play the game on my PC (though it worked fine on my XBox 360 when I bought one) and I developed a loathing of Steam, for getting in the damn way all the time!
I see it hasn't improved on that front.
I agree, licensing is needed, piracy must be controlled, but it should be in a way that is to the benefit of the legitimate consumer, not hassle and pain and assuming we are all thieves! 
Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952)
Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)
|
|
|
|
|
Well the first parts of your answer are awesome, but apperantly that was the time i sh*t my Pants or wasn't even Born 
My early pc-gaming days started 2000 (Computer with Internet)
But what i actually wanted to reply to is your problematic with steam, all the time it updates you say? Well, everybody can have his opinion about it, but i never ever had Problems with that. Neither does it update all the time nor does it kill my Internet Connection.
Maybe i am just a lucky guy and steam likes me and does what i want, but as others already replied try playing it without steam, cause as it is not a valve game it might work.
Steamapps/Common/ there you might find the duke and an .exe to start without steam
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
THIS!
"I can get my games wherever I log in, but I have to actually DOWNLOAD THEM!?! DWEEBRAGE!!"
And why even be angry at the developer who actually does updates and patches to a released product? Sounds to me like a full bore homer simpson "45 seconds, but I want it NOW!"
op.insert(bigboypants);
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like you were getting steams version of Duke. The last update for Duke had to be 15 years ago or longer. I have found some steam games don't require steam. You just need to play with it and see. I do know that Duke uses Dosbox under Steam so you might be able to cut the umbilical.
Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.
|
|
|
|
|
Dude? Am i wrong now or is it you? Duke Nukem Forever is the latest one that was released at 2012/13? dunno exactly
Edit: was 2011 just wikipediad it
if(this.signature != "")
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}
|
|
|
|
|
Guess it was 2011, but you are still closer.
Source[^]
Clean-up crew needed, grammar spill... - Nagy Vilmos
|
|
|
|
|
I stand corrected. HUH who'd a thunk it.
Jack of all trades, master of none, though often times better than master of one.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
