|
I've rescued the formatting on the one, and fixed the images on another. I can see you working away at the third.
And once your technical blog entry has been approved, you can then delete it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks Sean.
>>I can see you working away at the third.
Unfortunately, I was unable to fix the third article.
Secret Covert Hush-Hush White Space in the DOM…EXPOSED![^]
I tried editing the article directly and copying the HTML to notepad, working on that and then pasting it back in. In both cases the article gets corrupted. Apparently I am too stupid to use the Code Project editor. Or perhaps there is another explanation.
>> And once your technical blog entry has been approved, you can then delete it.
That doesn't make sense to me. Hopefully, you can also fix the third article.
Thanks again,
Steve Wellens
|
|
|
|
|
I did indeed fix it. I am always happy to do so.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I see the same issue. 
|
|
|
|
|
As I told you in the question, I think that comes because a pair of <code></code> tags is not correctly matching. Or there is one <code> without a </code>
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello
I edited my article[^] by pasting html code in the new editor.
The preview had some problems:
. Some html comments appear in the previewed text.
. 'Span' tags appear in source code blocks.
. pictures does not display (wrong address ?).
I suggest to check these problems.
In the end, I have had to use the old editor, which worked fine.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Christophe Bertrand wrote: In the end, I have had to use the old editor, which worked fine.
I recall that I had to fix the span problem for you (in a previous version of the article), even though you have used the old editor back then. Can you provide us the information you see here[^]?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the last version. This time no problem with the old editor, maybe it has been fixed meanwhile.
I use FireFox 29.0.1 on Windows. For more informations, please give me an email address (private reply is enable below).
|
|
|
|
|
The information you provided should be sufficient. I'm not a CodeProject staff member, but Sean will take care of the problem once you emailed him what you have pasted.
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please email me what you pasted? I'll take a look.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I noted that recently clicking on some of the links in my Reputation History item link me to this article
Adding SMS notifications to your Windows Azure projects[^]
It may be intersting to note that this article that I was directed to has exceptional download figure in hundred of thousands, but the view figure is less than 20 thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
 I was just going to write a similar post because I noticed the spike in the Reputation graph of the author of that article. There is definitely something wrong.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Team,
I normally bookmark all interesting articles and sometimes while looking for references, I go to my bookmarks and open articles from there. Lately, I have observed that when I open a bookmarked article, the "star" representing the bookmark on the right hand side of the article does not appear as solid. As a result, I often get confused, as to whether the article has been opened from bookmarks or not. Can you please look into this issue?
DNG
|
|
|
|
|
Showing an indication that an article has been opened from a bookmark list (as opposed to from anywhere else) isn't a feature we've implemented, nor, if I'm to be honest, is it something high on our priorities.
Sorry - I just can't see it as a killer feature.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
In my article: Considerations on Efficient use of LINQ Extension Methods[^] I tried to use < and > entities in the Summary ("1-line description") specifically:
IEnumerable<T>
but it ended up with just the IEnumerable
It appears as if the <T> was stripped.
Thoughts?
Or am I imagining the whole problem...
(I'm pretty sure I used the markup in that part of the submission wizard.)
A positive attitude may not solve every problem, but it will annoy enough people to be worth the effort.
|
|
|
|
|
The user details appear in a box on the left hand side now, instead of just above the user name.
[Edit]
Internet Explorer 9.0
[/Edit]
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
I can't replicate. Can you post a screenshot?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Screen shot unfortunatly blocked by our system. Anyway it's looking strange..
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
I can see perfectly at my end. Tried almost 10 different places.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Can't replicate the behavior. Maybe a temporary glitch?
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Got it! See my answer to Chris bellow!
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
Aaah, I see. Compability View as in "F*ck it up to display old, crappy pages correctly" 
I will never again mention that Dalek Dave was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel.
The console is a black place [taken from Q&A]
How to ask a question
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi wrote: Compability View as in "F*ck it up to display old, crappy pages correctly
I know. And it's just by chance I saw that. Somehow they (our sistem admins) put that option on for the Internet Terminal Servers per default..
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
|
Got it! It does that when, in IE9, you have the "Compatibility View" setting on. Turning it off removes the behavior..
The signature is in building process.. Please wait...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
