|
My cookin' is top drawer. Except last night. That was erm, well I :thought: I had some cooked chicken but it turned out to be ![Sheep | [baah]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/sheep.gif)
Tonight is definitely chicken. I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How very dare you!
Moroccan Lamb with Minted Couscous not good enough for you? 
{Admittedly, I thought it was a chicken stew I was defrosting. This is why I believe in labelling left-overs before putting them in the freezer. I believe in it, I just don't do it.]
|
|
|
|
|
No, it is not. I want
White and green asparagus with creamed morels
Maine lobster creamed with leeks and tapioca topped with osetra caviar
Almond crusted Soft shell crabs in a coconut citrus glaze
Roasted Alaskan Halibut with lobster water cooked red lentils with a fricassee of shiitakes and salsify and an apple glaze
Oh, and Twinkie for dessert!
|
|
|
|
|
I've put up a survey here[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, democracy ! 
Given: only if you decide to follow the survey results...
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
I voted to publish only your name and vote 
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: Ah, democracy !
Given: only if you decide to follow the survey results...
Perhaps a Republic then.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps make the votes on that survey public aswell?
|
|
|
|
|
Let's have a vote on that!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
I've just noticed your survery text:
I'd still have voted yes - I normally comment unless spam or plagiarised.
My idea was to see who'd approved an article post approval, in an attempt to deter people approving guff and allow a certain amount of self-policing. The other worry is, if the current approvals are to be visible during the approval process it might sway people, e.g. if OG has approved, I respect his opinion, so I'll approve type mentality.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: My idea was to see who'd approved an article post approval
Ah, I missed this, sorry.
But...not sure it'll do what you think it'll do. As soon as an article is approved it is no longer available for moderation: a refresh or new load of the article will no longer show the approval widget.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I can imagine that they mean something similar to when something was reported / nuked: Message closed because "XXX", "YYY", "ZZZ" reported it due to blah blah blah"
But more like: Article approved by: XXX, YYY, ZZZ...
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Keith Barrow wrote: if OG has approved, I respect his opinion, so I'll approve
Ah.
Hadn't thought of that...so no pressure then, eh?
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
It's all right. I'll balance him out. I don't respect your opinion at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Phew! I was getting worried there...
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
I could approve "a" and "the" but not "teh"
|
|
|
|
|
It's a feature, not a bug: it's in the documentation!
You looking for sympathy?
You'll find it in the dictionary, between sympathomimetic and sympatric
(Page 1788, if it helps)
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that you came back right in the middle of The discussion !
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Entropy isn't what it used to.
|
|
|
|
|
If only the Scottish Referrendum was as simple.....
|
|
|
|
|
Please keep the politics in The Lounge 
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, if I want it public I post a comment.
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I agree with other people. If I want it to be public, I leave a comment.
I mean, if the functionality is implemented, I would not like the information to be open to all the public.
But I would not mind if it was available for a reduced group of people to help CP to keep good level and be clean.
I could imagine a button that only is visible for that group of persons with the privilege (like delete QA Items)Owner, Admin, Editor, Subeditor, Protector, maybe mentor too...
That way, would be possible to keep tract of puppets, favouritisms, trying to fool because is cool... and so on. But still having the needed privacity to avoid points commented in other messages. Like automatic aproving if a respected member already did it, aproving returns (I clicked in yours, please click in mine) or things like that.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And that's the beauty of Codeproject...
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
