|
Mike Hankey wrote: to much time on there hands
Perhaps they could spend some of it learning the difference between "to", "too" and "two".
If they have any left, they could tackle the tricky "there", "their" and "they're".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Please, no Facebook links.
|
|
|
|
|
Just only the video once 
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Get this into your head:
If you, once upon a time, created an account with facebook, e.g. just to see what the fuss was about, but you decided that you don't like it/its total lack of personal security/its complete disregard of your privacy, you are screwed, because you cannot close or delete that account.
All you can do is "deactivate" it.
Then, some dick comes along and posts an unflagged link to facebook, which, being a trusting sort (trusting that you're not dealing with idiots who also have no regard for personal information or privacy), you click.
When you arrive at the facebook page, your account is reactivated.
Those of us with enough brains to know that the Internet is not a lovely, friendly, fluffy-bunny place where all your personal information should be freely available for everyone (including government organisations, hackers, fraudsters, and advertisers) to see Do. Not. Want facebook accounts, and we certainly do not want idiots reactivating these unwanted facebook accounts for us.
Do. Not. Post. facebook. Links. Without. A. Warning.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Wow Hold on,
The link doesn't require to have a FB account. If it does, I wouldn't share it from the beginning. It's a public link available through Facebook. Similar to Youtube links. The rest of the things that you throws are irrelevant to the link. If you do have a problem, you can report to the person who concerns.
BTW. Do you aware CP uses social media accounts(Facebook,google, linkedin) ?
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Going to a facebook page reactivates a deactivated account.
People who deactivate accounts do not want them reactivated by following a link in a discussion board.
If you post a link to a facebook page, indicate that it is to a facebook page, or people will get pissed off with you.
According to the rules used by every malware-detection program, facebook is one of the worst malware sites on the planet -- other sites that are far less intrusive than facebook are blocked without a second thought.
I think I'll start voting postings with unflagged facebook links as abusive.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If the fear of clicking a facebook link causes you to sh*t yourself, and you're too lazy to look at links before clicking themselves; there's a much easier solution than ordering depends by the pallet. Null route the domain in your HOSTS file and you'll never have to fear accidentally going to that site ever again.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Dan Neely wrote: If the fear of clicking a facebook link causes you to sh*t yourself, and you're too lazy to look at links before clicking themselves
Can you see any reason why my reply to that should not be "f*** you"? Because I can't.
Maybe you don't get hundreds of "be my friend" requests from total strangers who start mouthing off that you're an arrogant c**t when you rightly decline, but that's something that some of us have to deal with.
Dan Neely wrote: Null route the domain in your HOSTS file and you'll never have to fear accidentally going to that site ever again.
I've done that on previous machines, but it's not what you would call an elegant solution.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm getting sick to death of unflagged facebook links.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Is a beast from the pits of pure evil. That is all.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Is it the new Lotus Notes? My primary customer uses it. It's better than a network drive... I guess.
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
What was your first clue?
|
|
|
|
|
I agree...I have to deal with two versions...'Windows SharePoint Services' (very crude) with one client and SharePoint 2010 (marginally less crude) with another.
I tried to set up my own SharePoint server once, to horse around with it and see what makes it tick...the experience made me like Linux a lot more
|
|
|
|
|
So here I'm sitting in a corner, debugging my emulation code and losing my sanity only to realize that the code does not emulate actual bug that was present in real hardware. 
Oh well I guess sometimes bug IS the feature.
|
|
|
|
|
Ahh, the famous "it's your software" bug I have had to deal with those many time 
|
|
|
|
|
Need to get my head into this stuff, at the moment I just hack my CSS out, any recommendations?
|
|
|
|
|
Why not just go and learn it from their documentation?
http://sass-lang.com/guide[^]
Or just Google it out, to find the best result?
Favourite line: Throw me to them wolves and close the gate up. I am afraid of what will happen to them wolves - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a big fan of http://bourbon.io/[^] and neat, which puts me firmly on the sass side of things.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have the choice, go for LESS the syntax is more CSS like and has VS Web Essentials support I've an old article on SASS, the principles are the same on both, you just need to make syntax terminology adjustments.
Alberto Brandolini: The amount of energy necessary to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it.
|
|
|
|
|
I hope this isn't programmy enough that y'all think it should be in one of the forms that doesn't get any traffic.
I'm involved with making recommendations for adding analytics to an asp.net mvc application that is going to be customized and installed in hundreds of sites. The team building it wants to write a custom collection service with SSRS reports for users to view results. I think they should use an existing product like piwik.
However, with hundreds of installs I think it should be a plugin, and give the host the ability to integrate the best analytics for them. I've worked with iMIS, and nopcommerce and they have a rigid ability to do plugins. I've also worked with wordpress, and while I hate php, the plugin model for wordpress is extremely powerful.
So my question is what is the best plugin/widget implementation you've seen for .net, especially asp.net mvc?
|
|
|
|
|
Can't you use MEF with ASP.Net?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
MEF works for loading the assembly. I'm looking more suggestions on how to structure the interactions. NopCommerce exposes IWidgetPlugin, IPaymentMethodPlugin, etc. The hooks are very limited and predefined.
As an example I'm working on writing a plugin that allows sending to multiple addresses for nopCommerce and because nobody wrote the hooks for that kind of change, I'm having to hack at the core files. I'm trying to avoid those kind of limitations.
In contrast with wordpress, there would be a "generate_order" action where I'd replace just that one part and return a collection of orders rather than a single order. Almost every function in the product can be disabled and overridden from a plugin.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Brummer wrote: it should be in one of the forms that doesn't get any traffic.
Perhaps they should be closed? Seems to be that lots of people avoid them due to traffic.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps some CP members (based on rep ?) should be allowed to move clearly off-topic technical questions to the appropriate forums ?
It is true that one can report a QA question as being "off-topic" these days, but that doesn't seem to stop tons of them from showing in the C# QA forum, for example.
cheers, Bill
« I had therefore to remove knowledge, in order to make room for belief » Immanuel Kant
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: Seems to be that lots of people avoid them due to traffic.
Perhaps people avoid them because there are no questions being asked?
Which came first? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
