|
If it's a rule, then it should be in the imperative, i.e. Let pedantry be encouraged.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
That looks suspiciously like VB to me: Let pedantry = encouraged.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
How dare you utter the Black Speech in this holy place?
|
|
|
|
|
Careful, you're talking to a Vbite
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
CBadger wrote: 11: Pedantry is has to be encouraged. FTFY. But your mistake is not forgiven! But you are welcome.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBadger wrote: "has to be"" - Pedantry is required...
"is to be" - Pedantry is expected/advised/recommended... Hey, there's no need to be pedantic about it!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm NOT a Pedant.
in the precise definition of the term
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, we're programmers - we're professional pedants!
I'm a professional, trust me.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Lovely,
So this is you...
Pedant Troll[^]. In his imagination, pedant troll is the very exemplar of reason, balance and moderation. He feels effortlessly superior to the ridiculous, extremist, purblind fool whose blog he haunts, and whom he likes to put down with his killer sarcasm, weapons-grade pedantry and niggling little quibbles masquerading as constructive criticism. If he were really as brilliant as he thinks he is, he would at the very least have a major blog of his own by now, and more likely be King of the World. Strangely, he has yet to achieve either of these things.
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe, but I wouldn't call you an extremist purblind fool.
I was thinking more along the lines that code doesn't tolerate fuzzy and that we drive users nuts when we harass them for clarification on their loose requirements language.
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
Believe me, that was deliberate. Also, you may want to remove extra " from your reply.
And no, I am not being pedantic.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
If there's one thing I can't stand it's nit-picking pedantry.
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
Why the colon? Surely if it's part of a numbered list you should have a period instead of a colon, no? Also should a numbered list have a period at the end of each list item?
|
|
|
|
|
JMK-NI wrote: Why the do you use a colon?
JMK-NI wrote: Surely if it's part of a numbered list you should have a period instead of a colon, no don't you?
JMK-NI wrote: Also, should a numbered list have a period at the end of each list item?
You are welcome. I thoroughly enjoyed fixing your problems for you.
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
CBadger wrote: Why the do you use have you used a colon?
CBadger wrote: I thoroughly enjoyed fixing your problems for you.
Ditto!
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Agent__007 wrote: CBadger wrote: Why the do you use have are you using a colon?
Agent__007 wrote: CBadger wrote: I thoroughly enjoyed fixing your my problems for you.
»»» <small>Loading Signature</small> «««
· · · <small>Please Wait</small> · · ·
|
|
|
|
|
"Moneylenders will take a penny to improve their position."(8)
---------------------------------
Obscurum per obscurius.
Ad astra per alas porci.
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur .
|
|
|
|
|
Moneylender - Swindler. Cheats on borrowers (take their penny) for this financial gain(improve their position)
Rough guess I know
Beauty cannot be defined by abscissas and ordinates; neither are circles and ellipses created by their geometrical formulas.
Carl von Clausewitz
Source
|
|
|
|
|
Could be usurpers.
Moneylenders = usurers
Add a p (penny)
Usurpers could be considered as improving their position.
One day I aspire to having a signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Having been deemed guilty of false advertising, Red Bull has decided to settle in a $13M class-action lawsuit. Merely buying a can of the stuff between Jan 1, 2002 and Oct 3,2014 entitles one to a $10 refund.
I think the claim-form server needs to drink a red-bull or 20, having been lethargic for over 24 hours now.
"Careathers, a Red Bull drinker, claims that the drink maker misled him and other consumers with its slogan "Red Bull gives you wings." He says the company advertised some of the benefits of drinking Red Bull include increased performance, concentration and reaction speed. Of course, none of this was ever proven or backed up by scientific evidence."
Source: http://wpdh.com/red-bull-owes-you-10-heres-how-to-collect/[^]
"When I was 5 years old, my mother always told me that happiness was the key to life. When I went to school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down 'happy'. They told me I didn't understand the assignment, and I told them they didn't understand life." - John Lennon
|
|
|
|
|
I bet the refund checks will fly off the shelves
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
I don't mind energy drinks having a bit less caffeine as there is so much sugar in them that the mix of both
wakes me up pretty well when I choose to drink it. Maybe it is just psychological but it does work
As to giving you wings, I hope people trying to fly will realise that if you are not sure if you can fly or not,
you should try off the ground first, before leaping down tall buildings
P.S. : Which slogan isn't meant to mislead the consumer ?
|
|
|
|
|
RUs123 wrote: Which slogan isn't meant to mislead the consumer ? Apparently many people in QA asking questions are misled by CPs slogan.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|