|
Wrong! In that case we had no top-experts list...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Arora_Ankit wrote: I think there is a bug.
Why?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Because he didn't saw his name in it...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Because he didn't saw his name in it...
Perhaps. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
you are right lol
|
|
|
|
|
Arora_Ankit wrote: How top 5 experts of day is calculated?
The system looks at the amount of Authority points you've gained within the latest 24 hours, and displays the people who have gained the most.
Arora_Ankit wrote: I think there is a bug.
Can you provide some explanation about it please?
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
In the list I saw user with 165 points in top 5 and I found mine more than that But I'm not in that 
|
|
|
|
|
It's about the points gained in the latest 24 hours, not all time. Are you sure you have gained more than 165 points the latest 24 hours? And as Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter said, it is a cached list, so it takes some time before it's updated.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes possible that it has some cache or some delay in refresh.
Note:-
I have ~190 for 14/oct/2014 these are Authority points. if I count total for the day then it will be much more.
|
|
|
|
|
You need to earn Expert points, not just any points.
Answer lots of questions really well and you'll get points for the answers and points for when people upvote and accept your answers.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: really well
Caveat? 
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramFOX wrote: The system looks at the amount of Authority points you've gained within the latest 24 hours, and displays the people who have gained the most
Are you sure that explains the section labeled "Top Experts in 24hrs"? 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It is also a cached list - so it refresh a few times only a day and it possible that one who had place in it one point of time will not see himself because of when the refresh happening...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not possible...Caching is a fact...
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Run! Take a screenshot!!!
I'm not questioning your powers of observation; I'm merely remarking upon the paradox of asking a masked man who he is. (V)
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Run! Take a screenshot!!!
that's evil... but true 
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
lol.....
|
|
|
|
|
Using Chrome Version 40.0.2185.0 canary (64-bit)
Posting an answer in QA posts it fine, but when I go to close the page afterwards I get the "this page has changed, do you really want to leave?" message
(I'll try it on "regular" 32 bit version next time and update this)
[edit1] It doesn't happen with comments on a question, just answers [/edit1]
[edit2] Forgot to try it on "vanilla" Chrome, but the latest version of Canary ("Version 40.0.2188.1 canary (64-bit)") gives the same message. [/edit2]
[edit3] Vanilla chrome "Version 37.0.2062.120 m" gives the same problem, and is updating at the moment [/edit3]
[edit4] Vanilla Chrome "Version 38.0.2125.101 m" gives the same problem. [/edit4]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 14-Oct-14 9:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
You know, it is a conspiracy. We had 3 weeks to plan how to annoy you in your return  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the same problem last night in Firefox 32.0.3, so I don't think it's limited to Chrome.
However, the problem only appeared after your return. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That's right, blame me for everything! 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
We usually do. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Are we married?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
My hair might be going grey, but it doesn't quite look like wool yet.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
