|
.. I today stumbled upon this account[^]. named CodeProject.
He (it)'s been updating questions in the Quick Answers section, so I just wanted to know whether CodeProject owns it or not.
Looking at his (its) speed of answering the question with almost good logic is a good news for CodeProject if its a CodeProject's bot.
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime, yo - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly!
I have reported the profile as Abusive/Troller. Hopefully it will be taken down.
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime, yo - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I clicked on a few links in QA questions from whatever/whoever 'Codeproject Bot' is: one of them was a link back to the QA question itself.
This is clearly some form of abuse of CodeProject. But, why would someone take the time to do this, or to write some program that automated this kind of nonsense ?
That it's easy to bloat one's reputation-score on QA by rapid look-up on Google, and pasting in links into a "solution," without any real effort to understand the question, and whether or not the links found are really relevant to the question asked ... that's already obvious to most people.
« I am putting myself to the fullest possible use which is all, I think, that any conscious entity can ever hope to do » HAL (Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer) in "2001, A Space Odyssey"
|
|
|
|
|
Right, but that doesn't make sense. This (bot) is not even posting those Googled CodeProject answers. He is even posting MSDN links. Have a look at this answer[^].
He (it) posted a totallyyyyy un-relative link.
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime, yo - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Now up to 277 answers all today! Certainly needs some more kicks.
|
|
|
|
|
283 and 1% might be helpfull, 99% are spam posts. Some link upto MSDN, some to Support.Microsoft etc.
Its really annoying.
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime, yo - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
It is because it does not make "sense" that I am interested in what the motivation of the creator of this nuisance might be:
1. because they are a troll, and this is what troll's do ? just a form of vandalism ?
2. because they get-off showing how they can hack into systems, or do end-runs around web-site control ? showing-off ?
3. is this someone taking some form of "revenge" on CodeProject for some personal reason ?
4. is this someone practicing for joining the cyber-wing of some liberation-army or fanatic group ?
... or ... ?
« I am putting myself to the fullest possible use which is all, I think, that any conscious entity can ever hope to do » HAL (Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer) in "2001, A Space Odyssey"
|
|
|
|
|
No, it's not us.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
.. I really like the new Profile Page. (Yes, I do!).
But I think, if you just remove the LinkedIn label from the profile page (that is written alongwith the the LinkedIn image) since Twitter and Google+ don't have it. Image link[^].
Just asking. 
You only get one shot, do not miss your chance to blow
This opportunity comes once in a lifetime, yo - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
You're too quick: I was in the middle of an update.
All done, and the layout is as it should be.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I wrote this article several years ago to publish my library, and the library has became widely used.
Currently, I need some funds to continue developing it. So I decided to solicit donations for the project. I got started a Pledgie campaign to collect donations.
So CodeProject allows me to announce it in my article?
|
|
|
|
|
If we condone it on one article we must condone it on all articles.
Imagine every single article that you read asking you for donations.
It goes against the spirit of why I started CodeProject: to give away freely with no expectation other than people might find it useful, and in return they may contribute something I would find useful.
So: I would prefer not, but I do appreciate you asking.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! I see your point and sorry for my lack of consideration.
|
|
|
|
|
Tsuda Kageyu wrote: sorry for my lack of consideration.
In my opinion, you DO have consideration. You asked first.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
These messages: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Messages.aspx?fmid=212325[^] - have a close look at the top one.
http://www.codeproject.com/Messages/3198711/CppDepend.aspx
When you click on it, it takes you to the spammers site directly!
I can only assume that the message itself has a divert of some form in it?
But that means I can't find it to report it as spam... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Oooh... nice! (Not). 
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like he posted an item in the "News" category, and News items automatically redirect to the website they link to, which happened here.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
When we had news items that linked to other sites we used to frame those news items and offer a discussion board underneath. We decided a while ago that framing other sites is bad Karma and instead we send the viewer straight to the site.
When you try and view a message posted to a news item (ie during the framing era) you won't be able to see that message because you'll be immediately flung to the news item itself.
Nothing malicious, just a side effect of a change in policy.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
in my newly posted article, the images don't show up.
can someone please help?
Thanks
Edgar
Article link:
[^]
|
|
|
|
|
They seem to be OK now. Same for you?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, but the download links are not yet fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. I tested in two browsers. What browser are you using?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Chrome, Opera
I tried also the link directly:
[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean
people complain daily about the broken links.
Can I do something, so that it get fixed earlyer? I do not understand, why the images seem to work with the relative link, but the code files don't. Was it because I used the new article editor of Codeproject?
Thanks,
Edgar
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
