|
I had literally written 5 paragraphs of an article I am working on, accidentally hit back and bam, all gone!
My fault (I'm not used to this keyboard and hit Alt+Left as opposed to Ctrl+Left to jump over a word) but a dialogue if you try to navigate away would be really handy.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
Disregard, turned out it had auto-saved and was able to select it from the menu and continue, thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Always write your articles offline, and only upload them when they are (almost) complete. Editing online is always risky, however hard the developers of CodeProject try to care for us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Style
overflow:scroll;
not working.
And how I can add borders to table?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please email me the HTML? Maybe I have a better option.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see what's happening. The problem is the article editor is very particular. We also like to keep our article within the confines of 640 pixels. The only way to fit that text you wanted was to reduce the size. I've applied our custom table class to your table and changed the font size. Lemme know what you think.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 MB is a bit too big for us, I'm afraid. The external link will be fine in this case.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I have to develop a dynamic code obfuscation technique with tamper-proofing to protect against the reverse engineering. Is it possible to develop code obfuscation using evolutionary computing.
|
|
|
|
|
It's probably not worth the trouble.
Have you looked at the available obfuscation solutions?
|
|
|
|
|
Please note this forum is for questions about Articles you have written. Use the Quick Answers forum[^] for technical queries.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a difference between obfuscation and tamper-proofing things. There's no way to prevent reverse-engineering, but that should not matter if you want to make things tamper-proof 
As for preventing reverse-engineering - as said, it is not worth the trouble. If I need to, I'll reuse it as is, without decompiling.
..and I'm starting to think that most code is like most database-structures; most managers think that it is a valuable company-secrect, where it is usually a non-normalized structure that gets beaten by one of the free structures on database-answers.org.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I reported this Tip/Trick as plagiarised by mistake : http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=151343&aid=849706[^]. It is closed because of reports. Then i came to know about the same Author. I removed the post in S&A,but this content would be acceptable as Technical blog.
@Sean, would you please contact the Author as i can't find a way to notify him regarding the same (Tech. Blog).
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Will do. Thanks for letting me know.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
This Tip seems no meaning and not explained properly. He has shown a sample SQL Function In his tip. Even the sample function from the Tip is not working.
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, just very poor quality.
|
|
|
|
|
hi, i was writing a tutorial for html5 webgl and my article got closed without discussion
even when i suggested i improve or broaden it according to the wishes of the people who decide whether my article gets published or not, I'm just curious was this a mistake or was this intended?
Yours truly,
Jani M.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears to have been published now, but I suspect it was marked down as it is rather short for an article. Maybe you should wait until you have more content before trying to publish.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah thanks for looking into this, I will put the article on hold and improve the amount of content for the first part of the tutorial series, and then I will do the same treatment for tutorial part 2.
Thanks for your time mr. MacCutchan really appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
It was closed - as it is NOT an article. You should received a notification about it...
In any case it is still not an article. As title suggest it is a part of a series I advise to combine several parts (all of) to one single article instead of posting it in a blog-like fashion...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello mr. Kornfeld,
thank you for your advice, your time spent is appreciated by me and it is good to see activity and response times of this level at codeproject.com, tells something about the health of the site.
I must contest though that I would much prefer to write the tutorials as full articles instead of small tips or tricks and am willing to wait on the publish while I add content to them rather than convert them to tips. I'll add pictures, flesh out content more around the articles bones, whatever it takes, but I'd rather not publish anything at all if they will be forcibly converted to tips like some of the feedback suggested  I'll be adding more content in the coming days such as pictures of the finished results etc.
Thanks again for your response and time spent on this matter.
Kind regards,
Jani M.
|
|
|
|
|
Then you should write it everything down OFFLINE and when ready, come up with the full version. That way, the probability of getting it approved instead of being nuked down will be much higer
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm considering writing a couple of articles on pen-testing with Kali.
There's no real coding involved, but I still think it would be useful for developers (to test their apps etc), would this be cool (and considered on-topic etc)?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
