|
Cannot update my password.
This bug has been on the site for two days.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried another browser, does it give any messages, is there any errors on the browser dev console?achalk wrote: This bug has been on the site for two days.
Maybe there is no bug and it is at your end, or maybe they are extremely busy, or possibly they just don't know about the bug until you posted your message.
|
|
|
|
|
When I logged in this morning, my settings had gone. Instead of my usual 50 messages per fluid page, I was down to 25 per fixed layout page. My notification settings had changed as well. Now, I know I didn't change things.
|
|
|
|
|
Hamsters must have been trying to break the site again!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Hamsters must have been trying to breaking the site again!
FTFY
It is Christmas and they've probably been down the LCBO (= Booze Ontario).
Merry Christmas Hamsters!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
My settings are just fine. Are you on an Android device where Chrome just got updated?
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Ah you must have been the first to fall victim of the santa hamster.
He doesn't really care if you'v been good or bad, he just likes to play tricks.
He is a not so jolly one this hamster, something about being left in the cold.
Of course nobody knows the real story, well nobody except CM but he isn't telling.
I'd say leave a bottle of gin out for him, but that just makes things worse.
He only comes out to play around x-mas, so just another couple days
and everything will be back to the way it was before.
Merry x-mas, and happy new year.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: I'd say leave a bottle of gin out for him,
I thought you were speaking of santa, not nagy  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I slipped-up and forgot to make a backup of my "solution" before the "jaws of death" closed: [^].
Is that "version" hack still available that someone here (Rage ?) showed me how to use to recover the post ?
Edit: yes, it was ProgramFox showed me how to find a deleted response using the 'version url, and I found it, sans carriage-returns, but otherwise intact.
Unfortunately, I lost my comment to Sergey's comment which was meant to go in my ammunition box
thanks, Bill
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
modified 19-Dec-14 9:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
You'd think he would back off at this time of year.
Oh well, so much for goodwill to all men.
Have a good one Bill!
Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.
|
|
|
|
|
Allow the author to set the Author level at which a member must be in order to vote on his article. This is based on the assumption that most higher level users are actually programmers and have a certain level of maturity and integrity.
The default would be ALL, but other levels would be Platinum, Gold, Silver, and Bronze.
Also, allow the author to contest a vote that is not tied to reporting a message as abuse or spam. Another option in the report icon menu could be "Unjustified".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
I can understand your concern but that won't help as all will start setting level as platinum and in most of the case i have seen,members going through and making use of the Article are bronze or silver levels.
We have rating system in place especially to handle such cases. These negative voting will not make any effect. As per as the recent case is concerned, member is under process and will be no more within few hours.
If you still find such members who always see everything negatively, mention them at SA watch and necessary action will be taken (We had found such members in past).
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I think you need to let this go and just move on. I say this with kindness.
|
|
|
|
|
About a month ago there was a bit of discussion on a similar post[^]
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
What's the specific problem you're looking to solve?
I'm in favour of fixing broken things. I'm not in favour of breaking something else to fix something. And then causing leaks and squeaks and endless complaints about the fix forever after.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: This is based on the assumption that most higher level users are actually programmers and have a certain level of maturity and integrity.
Um. Mostly.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: What's the specific problem you're looking to solve?
Things that bother me, of course.
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm in favour of fixing broken things. I'm not in favour of breaking something else to fix something. And then causing leaks and squeaks and endless complaints about the fix forever after.
And you call yourself a programmer?
BTW, you might recall an earlier suggestion I made regarding only allowing "This article is useful" votes, eliminating the numeric voting altogether. Of course, there's really no way to back-fill the system unless you make the assumption that an existing vote of (for example) 4 or more is required to determine whether or not an article is "useful", and all (existing) lower votes are thrown out.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
-- modified 18-Dec-14 7:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
When approving a forum message from the moderation queue, it will be shown as modified (" [modified]" appended to the subject). This might irritate the poster.
Also the message count on the user's profile will count such messages twice. I just noticed this behaviour with a new member posting his first message. When then openning the Lates Messages list, there will be only one message shown.
|
|
|
|
|
Jochen Arndt wrote: message from the moderation queue
Where is it?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be one of the new spam prevention mechanisms.
When then spam detection triggers on a new forum message, it will be put into the moderation queue where it can be tagged as spam or be approved for publishing.
The moderation queue link is shown on the main page above the article moderation links when it is not empty.
I had so far one spam message and two valid posts. With the spam message I reported the account which got then closed very fast.
|
|
|
|
|
I have never seen that link. Thanks for pointing that out. I will try to follow that link.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
You should spend more time on the main page than in the spam forum and Q&A
|
|
|
|
|
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
