|
Great to know...They need thrashing though.. 
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for the note. Good riddance (for how long?  )
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This one[^] is trying to get spam through but this time filters were working nicely.
Member needs kicks though.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Answers and spam messages removed - and he has been posting them since 2008 - but he needs more kicks.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
He is somehow known for me. I think I found some of his posts a time ago and gave him a warning to avoid such posts. He had more "articles" but I guess they got cleaned up.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, on my 10th report. Good riddance.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation TextBox Control[^]
No, seriously - how did it get through?
It doesn't provide the control it talks about, it's a poor idea, and the code he does show is trivial.
So who approved this as a tip?
"extremely poor quality" is meant for this stuff!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like it got through on its own? That doesn't seem right. I sent it back to the shadow.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Sean,
I don't know if you already read about it in some of my posts. But sometimes the hamster in the wheel after the CP-Editor runs in the wrong direction.
It happens specially when people with enough privileges edit a contribution. Somehow its type gets back to the default "article" altough they got approved and published as tip/trick or blogs.
I raised it in the B&S forum time ago, but I have noticed that it continue happening.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't see the question anymore. What was spammy about this?
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
It was like...
Problem: blah blah blah
this is my web site: Link 1
if you open this so its error page: Link 2
its working fine: Link 3
I think in this case could be a legitime user, but I have to agree that (if legitime) it was not asked in the best way
I haven't reported the account (2nd chance from my side). The question was already closed
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
