|
JMK-NI wrote: Apart from the 90 bajillion edge cases the code doesn't cover
But which can be covered with general purpose "tag" and "attribute" functions. I thought HTML Agility Pack was for parsing?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
HAP is read/write. You can create documents with it as well.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
---
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
---
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
With or without nasal fitment?
|
|
|
|
|
I believe you can use/extend TagBuilder[^] class. It's handy and very helpful.
WARNING: It is highly required to like ASP.NET MVC
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse wrote: I believe you can use/extend TagBuilder[^] class. It's handy and very helpful.
Interesting, but it's not exactly a fluent class (ie, it returns itself)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Ya. That is why I said extend
Wonde Tadesse
|
|
|
|
|
Wonde Tadesse wrote: Ya. That is why I said extend
Ah.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I have written a HTML 5 boilerplate using a fluent interface which generates the HTML on the server side. What I like about it is that it is strongly typed and I can use inheritance etc.
|
|
|
|
|
BlueMerc wrote: Yes, I have written a HTML 5 boilerplate using a fluent interface which generates the HTML on the server side.
Would the code be available?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I thought of creating an open source project for it, but I would need to refactor the code first. I never got to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The docs are available from the link, but here is the direct one for you [^]
|
|
|
|
|
carbonrobot wrote: The docs are available from the link, but here is the direct one for you [^]
Ack. I looked and didn't see it. Thanks for hand-holding me.
OK, I think we have a winner! This reads like what I was wanting to write (in terms of using it) and produces what I would expect. Very nice! And yay, a zip file rather than a NuGet package. Kudos also for commented code! I'm not being sarcastic, it's so discouraging when I come across code that completely lacks comments. I think you just saved me a few days of effort.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fantastically colorful! Though I wonder why the only color of the spectrum that appears to be missing is green... Anyone smarter than me have an answer?
|
|
|
|
|
As the picture was originally taken in infrared, all the colors are "false colors", i.e. the infrared spectrum is mapped to the visible spectrum. I'm not an expert in this field, but I suspect that the absence of green is due to the human eye's high sensitivity to green - it would appear much brighter than other colors in the false color image.
If there are any real experts out there - please confirm / refute my suspicion.
|
|
|
|
|
Nice, I over heard two guys at work discussing Orion and showed one them the Pic, I now have a friend!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please go easy on me I am still a beginner : )
"First of all: no German chauffeur on his wet Dublinesque passage to execution is joined into concatenation by his old pointless alphabet." (8)
no German chauffeur: Driver
pointless alphabet: rune
wet passage execution joined into concatenation: riverrun Absent form our dictionary sure, but not from our knowledge.
"First of all" and "Dublinesque" of course alluding to the famous first word of James Joyce's Finnegans Wake. Methinx some of you clever folks already had it figured. What do I do to get off the hook? : )
Life is too shor
|
|
|
|
|
megaadam wrote: What do I do to get off the hook?
Post one we can answer?
I think you are trying too hard (I've never heard of "riverrun", and it isn't in Google except in reference to Game of Thrones). And nobody in history ever read all of Finnegans Wake. In fact I understand that starting with the second edition, all pages from the start fo Chapter Two onwards are blank to save on printing costs and nobody has noticed...
Perhaps if you start by picking a word and work back from that to get the clue?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: And nobody in history ever read all of Finnegans Wake. I hate to contradict someone as erudite as your good self, but many years ago I did read quite a lot of Joyce's work including the aformentioned. Hardly understood a word of it mind you.
|
|
|
|