|
OMG!!!
Some ter'r'rist said a bomb was on a plane!
There wasn't a bomb and it was obviously a perverse joke by some middle-class white kid who was bored on a Saturday night -- but TER'R'RIST!!! AAARRGHHH!!!
We have to make laws that says we have to provide a blood sample and full transcription to our saviours in the security forces every time we sent a tweet or an e-mail!!!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
If you carry a bomb onto an aircraft you will be much safer, as the chance of their being two bombs on the same aircraft is infinitessimal
=========================================================
I'm an optoholic - my glass is always half full of vodka.
=========================================================
|
|
|
|
|
i'm reading the book. written in 1983! highly recommended. gets very interesting after Part I. i think it would be of special interest to OOPers (work on set theory and the idea of classes and types (not necessarily as OOP because it didn't really exist, but as concepts/approaches to problems such as godel's)) and crypto-people.
|
|
|
|
|
Didn't read that one, but I read this one:
The Annotated Turing[^]
It was pretty good, but it's basically only about the Turing Machine, i.a. the creation of a theoretical computer and its potential and limitation.
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to post that. Thanks for saving me the trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to say Ill wait for the movie, but that has already been made, by a Norwegian director. So you cant really not know it here were I'm at, as it was everywhere, in the news, papers, TV etc.
|
|
|
|
|
the iGame® gets a LOT deeper than i expected. and well written.
|
|
|
|
|
thewazz wrote: i'm reading the book
You are obviously a fan of fiction. Fine. The book and it's film (although very entertaining) has been disowned by most who know the facts first hand. Much better to read a factual account as others have suggested.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: disowned by most who know the facts first hand
i really doubt it. can you back this up?
|
|
|
|
|
thewazz wrote: not necessarily as OOP because it didn't really exist Sure it did.
The only difference was that it was called "programming", without the pointless prefix.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
!boolean...I hope...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great, I will try this next time in Restaurant.
Bruno
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure, but I lazy load.
|
|
|
|
|
I wanne be a string! can I ?! Please !? Pretty Please !? (With sugar on top)
(NSFW)
String[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You can't become a string; you're immutable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DOUBLE COMPLEX
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am a full implementation of IInnumerable and IUndefinable, as well IJustAnother, and IInsignificant.
As Walt Whitman limned:
"Do I contradict myself ? ... I am large; I contain multitudes."
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Can you repeat that? I'm typedef.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I'm all of them at once...
working from home is only done on weekends, when I'm awake and my wife is not, but...
|
|
|
|