|
I think this bug came up a while ago as well but can't seem to find it now.
I just edited a question (just some language improvements and cosmetics) and the question shows as edited but the name from the editor shows as '(no name)'.
Is this intended, caching issue, ... ?
I have a screen shot if you want it.
Link to question:
How to select a record in T_SQL useing stored procedure[^]
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
A question is repeated twice and both times it got some good solutions.Can we consider it as a repost .Because by doing so it will affect the solutions too
|
|
|
|
|
It would be good if the solutions from a reposted question could be moved to the original question.
Of course, that would require that we identify the original question when reporting a repost. Which probably wouldn't be a bad idea, apart from the extra workload for the hamsters to implement it! 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to get to the normal web site format using a tablet, I get the mobile view on a 12" tablet and it looks bloody ridiculous, I can read it from 15 paces.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Go to extreme bottom-> Click on Full-site.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Shock, horror, it worked. Thanks Rohan.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Do remember how to do it - it undoes itself every couple of days on mine... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please go to here[^] on your tablet and email me the results? chris at codeproject...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Cant login via Facebook.
Got such an error - facebook url does not match the application settings.
|
|
|
|
|
We've opened a ticket with Facebook but still not heard back from them
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Right now, this[^] is in moderation queue. I reported as 'Extremely poor quality'. What makes me think is, there is published version also : Add a Favicon[^]. How such content is getting approved? I think its time to redefine what 'Article' or Tip/Trick means.
Its Tip/Trick. As per our guidelines, Tip/Trick = Problem and quick solution to it. In this case, there is no problem or solution. It should be noted that we consider some short Articles as Tip/Trick,but adding favicon to site? How to consider it a Tip/Trick?
Suggestion : It would be great if names of those who approved gets displayed.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rohan, I agree with you that a lot of very marginal stuff is getting through as "articles;" I am not sure what I can do about that. My "standards" for written work are so "high," that I haven't been able to bring myself to getting into that aspect of participation on the site, fearing I would be too intolerant.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
His friend[^] was working on one article at that time and he published this[^]
I am trying to find Article on : Drag controls from toolbox and put them on page.
:thud: :thud:
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Even if the article/tip is published, you can report it.
That is the way, we can clean the poor articles/tips.
Different moderators view might be different for the same article/tip which is marginally correct/wrong. I think because of this reason, approver's names are not getting displayed: To avoid argument among moderators.
My Suggestion: In 1 or 2 cases when article is marginally OK, i have approved it and then felt that there should be take back option.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
My problem that this specific member is still here - just been reported here[^] as a plagiarist...twice at least...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
And last time... I thought he was gone.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems he resurrected...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
And it seems like I deleted it again.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
What disturbs be most that the member got a best article prize for a plagiarized article, got other plagiarized articles, had some crap 'articles', but still smiling at us...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That plagiarized prize article is deleted and will stay deleted.
I'm trying something with him. It's a process.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Wether I have big caching issues... or he[^] is still there.
has Sean finished the process with him? Or did he find a workaround?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
He's there while the process takes place. Think of it kind of like probation.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
OK
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In many places in forum, there is abusive/spam message removed by moderator/staff.
If the message is removed and there is no reply to it, what is the point showing it in the forum.
People (including me) have the tendency to expand the message and see even when we know that the message is removed.
Life is a computer program and everyone is the programmer of his own life.
|
|
|
|
|
It appears we have a caching issue, and under some conditions the message isn't being removed from the cache when deleted.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
