|
OK I will upload the articles which were approved by the ream again. Thank you for your reply .
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/[^]
==================!!!====================!!!========================
So much complexity in software comes from trying to make one thing do two things.
Kindest Regards
Sibeesh
http://sibeeshpassion.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorry to say but its not stolen from anywhere i hope you can understand it ...but any ways if the editor seems that way its ok for me
next time i will check for it
|
|
|
|
|
As per my comment[^] on the Spam and Abuse thread, I think some wires have got crossed somewhere. The first article doesn't appear to have been plagiarised from any source.
As for the second article, I'm not convinced[^] by Peter's comparison to the WordPress blog.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yikes. Major wires crossed. Apologies. I've restored the article and will report the blogspot.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I think some questions need answering about why his images point offsite though (on the VS article).
|
|
|
|
|
It looks like he previously posted that article to his own blog:
http://pranayamr.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/generate-sequcen-diagram-visual-studio.html[^]
The image URLs on that copy match those on the CodeProject article, so it looks like he copied his own blog-post to an article but forgot to update the image links.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Hi, I submitted my article via wizard. It was in pending status and somehow I messed it up I think. Now I see two versions and I am not sure what happened.
Can you please make the 1st version as the main one (Pending status) and let be available for moderation.
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?aid=871927&av=1300241[^]
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
I was going to do it, but the edit-lock is in posesion of Chris Maunder. That means, your problem will be solved very soon
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm working on it right now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have written a article via the DIY tool. My article is more or less ready but I am little confused how to attach images in my article.
any help please
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Here is our FAQ entry on the matter:
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
Please let me know if you run into any problems.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
It got solved. I just forgot to wear my glasses  . I was clicking on the wrong link. Sorry about that
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
There must be a tag or button also for adding Image.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, I've developed a hotkey management application for Windows. Its main feature is the ability to assign hotkeys to multiple keyboards connected to the computer.
Its original purpose was to improve ergonomics while working with graphics tablet, but I found it to be pretty useful even while working only on keyboard allowing me to have an extra keyboard dedicated for hotkeys next to it (for example to paste code blocks). Therefore I would like to offer the application to the users here (it is open source, free, without any ads).
What would be an ideal way of doing this? Should I write a Tip & Trick article for the application? Or is there more appropriate place where should I put its description? Or should I send it to somebody else to review it? (I would like it to have a discussion available, because I would appreciate any feedback).
|
|
|
|
|
Just write an Article/Tip about it, or post the message in the Free Tools forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, thanks for the reply
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that someone downloaded my code source for an article which was deleted long ago.
I've seen this happen numerous times but didn't worry about it til now.
The article:
View All Internet History and Images (from cache) for All Five Browsers[^]
I don't believe they can even view the article, but they downloaded the code.
I am posting this here so someone can help permanently remove the code and I am going to go and now attempt to delete the article again.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
No problem. I have deleted the code from the servers.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
I deleted the article for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time I see a batch of articles and tips, etc. come up for review that are old versions of published articles. I have left these alone (neither approved nor reported), but I'm curious what triggers these to come up, and what steps we as reviewers should take.
|
|
|
|
|
When an old article is updated by the author it will cause the article to go back into the moderation queue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
