|
If you have a fairly powerful machine you can use Open Broadcaster Studio software. It is optimized for Live-Streaming but can also record locally. If you have NVENC-compatible Nvidia-GPU (7xx or newer) or an Intel i5/i7 3xxx or newer you can use their hardware encoding to record with virtually no performance hit. OBS if free as in free beer, open-source and can record the whole screen or only single windows (Vista SP2 or newer required.)
If you need help, drop into our IRC help channel, #obsproject @ quakenet (or use webchat from the OBS homepage).
Download: https://www.obsproject.com/[^]
How-To for local recording with best quality: https://obsproject.com/forum/resources/how-to-make-high-quality-local-recordings.16/[^]
|
|
|
|
|
About 8 years ago Snagit offered Snagit 7 for free, with the hopes that you would install the software then upgrade to their newest version when they hounded you enough. Luckily you can turn the "check for updates" function off and continue using 7 in it's fully functional form. Message me if you want more info. Edit - Found the link[^]
modified 23-Feb-15 13:40pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm quite a fan of Screenpresso [^], it's free for personal use. It also is quite a lot of goodies for documenting screenshots.
Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies. T.Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
I like ScreenRecorder. Does Windows or full screen with audio.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2009.03.utilityspotlight2.aspx?pr=blog
(Now if I could only figure out how to use that ^ thingy)
73
|
|
|
|
|
Jing from TechSmith, same people who make Snag-It.
We use it a LOT. It has 2 capture buttons, one for video and one for just the screen.
You can save the file locally or upload it to their server and share the link.
The capture Video works great!
As an example: [^]
We have been using it for years. Love it!
Kirk Out!
|
|
|
|
|
[^]
That's Wink.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Expression Encoder 4 SP2 (using the Screen Capture component).
All free.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: ACCESS LIMITS: Clients may maintain connections to the server for no more than 86,400 seconds per day. If you need additional time, you may contact IERS[^] to file a request for up to one additional second.
xkcd[^]
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I especially like the "up to" part
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. That's an interesting tip.
Not sure what the point of contacting IERS could possibly be though. Last time I checked, 24 * 3600 = 86,400.
|
|
|
|
|
Wikipedia: Among its other functions, the IERS is responsible for announcing leap seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
That'd do it, thanks.
Though with only 25 of them inserted since 1972 (and some seconds subtracted too) it sure is an interesting tool-tip.
Edit: seconds are not subtracted, even in the event that a solar day is 86399 seconds long.
|
|
|
|
|
As an aside, the fact that there are 86400 seconds in a day is seared deep into my brain. At one point, I was working on a system with timestamps in seconds and so I was for ever doing mod 86400 to find out what time something happens. I could get a time, say 23452 and without calculating any further know what time it was; I just checked 6:30:52.
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
Why are they called apartments when they are all stuck together?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, that is correct. It would be compartment if you could get from one to the other internally but apartments are just discrete compartments. Sounded right when I thought it.
|
|
|
|
|
COM threading model flashback...
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
Why do we drive on parkways and park in driveways?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
There's far too much thinking going on in the Lounge, lately.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: hobby shop
No offence meant; but seriously, is hobby available for sale in a shop?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
It definitely looks tastier than let's say, carbon fiber.
|
|
|
|
|
It is, but not by much
|
|
|
|