|
W∴ Balboos wrote: in the US, she just may have shot back at him.
Given recent reports it is more likely her unborn child would have reached out of her vagina, removed her gun from her purse, and shot both of them.
Some men are born mediocre, some men achieve mediocrity, and some men have mediocrity thrust upon them.
|
|
|
|
|
Chaveri -
Didn't you notice my exit line? It kind of flavors the whole thing.
[On the other hand, one of the other replies indicates, sadly, I wasn't as far from the mark as one would hope]
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
The sub-species Bozo-Bozetta Flagrante of species Homo Sapiens Sapiens (we have to say "Sapiens" twice to reassure ourselves) is distributed world-wide.
Blame genes, proteins, and hormones, not a country.
«I'm asked why doesn't C# implement feature X all the time. The answer's always the same: because no one ever designed, specified, implemented, tested, documented, shipped that feature. All six of those things are necessary to make a feature happen. They all cost huge amounts of time, effort and money.» Eric Lippert, Microsoft, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
BillWoodruff wrote: Blame genes, proteins, and hormones Actually - you sort of proved my remark - well played.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, after all it remains wrong.
But laughable.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I do know it's wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm absolutely appalled.
I shall take every chance I get to point a finger and laugh at such a person who treats others so badly, though.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It's called an iPhen!!!
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Couldn't you wait your turn?
|
|
|
|
|
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Now you've made my head hurt I'm going home!
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Because all smaller numbers are irrelevant.
Still a finite number
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, and so much more interesting than ∞.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
All natural integers are interesting.
(The proof is left as an exercise for the student)
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
That's crackers.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The TREE sequence begins TREE(1) = 1, TREE(2) = 3, then suddenly TREE(3) explodes to a value so enormously large that many other "large" combinatorial constants, such as Friedman's n(4),[*] are extremely small by comparison.[1] A lower bound for n(4), and hence an extremely weak lower bound for TREE(3), is A(A(...A(1)...)), where the number of As is A(187196),[2] and A() is a version of Ackermann's function: A(x) = 2 [x + 1] x in hyperoperation. Graham's number, for example, is approximately A^64(4) which is much smaller than the lower bound A^A(187196)(1).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%27s_tree_theorem#Friedman.27s_finite_form[^]
I think it's time that we all went home...
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I think it's time that we all went home...
Apart from those of us who work from home, who should all go down the pub.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you spell that sequence using only A, C, G, and T?
"Go forth into the source" - Neal Morse
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but the representation is too large to fit in the margins of Code Project
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
So the U.S. debt is trying to surpass Graham's number?
Mongo: Mongo only pawn... in game of life.
|
|
|
|