|
Seems most unfair. He may be a bit controversial from time to time, but certainly not a spammer, troll or abuser. IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Have to agree.
He got a little shouty last night, but I didn't see anything more offensive than capital letters.
My vote: reinstate.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
As the one he got rudely shouty with, I was a little peeved by his "over-effusive" reply, but it certainly didn't merit banning -- and the only person who really has room to complain about that message is me.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Precisely.
I can see someone getting peeved with your message his was a response to - there are some ... um ... delicate souls ... here who can get "over enthusiastic" when they see even censored swearwords - but his was just shouty.
I see no reason for banning either. It's possible it's a vendetta thing: we know he got banned before.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Given that the problem with the thread is that no-one could tell what the Hell he was talking about, he did take it in a direction that few would have ("you have the right to remain silent", indeed).
I vote he's reinstated because I still don't know what, why, who, or even whether he was celebrating (telling people to change the language of a third-party site explains none of that).
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling there was liquid happiness involved.
It would explain a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a feeling that copious amounts of happiness were involved!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Somewhere between Bob Geldof and DD, I'd say.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I'm mightily interested in knowing how the rest of that scale looks like.
|
|
|
|
|
It looks kinda wobbly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed you are, but you're not coming through as thinskinned to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone can say absolutely anything to/about me in fun, but I reserve the right to not accept maliciousness (that's kinda one of the things that being English is about).
I don't think he was being soberly malicious; it read more like he was drunk and bombastic (annoyance level +1), he somewhat strongly implied that everyone was idiotic for not getting his opinion by looking at a wiki page (annoyance level +2), and he would not say what he was talking about (annoyance level +2).
So yeah, "a little peeved" describes it well enough.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
I've just learned that some of his 'controversial' post, may be because of using Google Translate to communicate with us...
But even not - he is not spammer or abusive...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Controversial, only if you don't agree with him.
But troll, no.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: The same platinum member who has done this a number of times.
We want names ! We want names ! Let's do public shaming ! 
|
|
|
|
|
I second that. 
I think they already implemented that. I even recall seeing the members' names on a member's profile whom they had reported. Not sure why they have undone that now... 
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
modified 2-Mar-15 5:50am.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, stop, I was being sarcastic ! I don't think public shaming would solve anything, but make it worse !
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: I was being sarcastic
Oh, I don't always get sarcasm. 
But seriously, they did implement public disclosure of the members who had voted a member on his "closed" profile page and I think it was a good idea. Not sure why they have discontinued it though.
Your time will come, if you let it be right.
|
|
|
|
|
Does this mean you will instate Bruno?
I suspect the shouting was a case of alcohol too far...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 28-Feb-15 11:38am.
|
|
|
|
|
In the ASP.NET section[^], I was told that is not about questions and answers only, but it is for discussions too.
So why is the text on the button "Ask question"? Shouldn't that be "New discussion" as it is here. I believe that would make more sense, since I had to add a suggestion, not a question; that was ambiguous there.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Afzaal Ahmad Zeeshan wrote: I had to add a suggestion
You would have used this forum. Name itself says it all.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I shouldn't post that here, because that wasn't a suggestion for this website or its developers, instead it was for general ASP.NET developers.
Anyways, Richard had me covered and helped me to post such stuff as a tip.
Thanks for your time too Rohan.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't the author of an article (also tip/trick) know who voted and what voted in his work? I do not mean unveiling the voter's identity, but the voter's status. For instance, status like: admin, mvp, author, less-than-30-days-old-member, etc... This would allow the author of an article to conclude more consistent information about his/her work. Maybe this is already possible, but I don't find the correct button to click.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
