|
SoMad wrote: What if it is Griff telling them, that we don't do their homework or something similar?
I think those kind of replies, regardless if it's Griff or someone else, should strictly be posted as a comment.
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
This one has been around for a long time. Many new Q&A respondents take their lead from the old hands.
I agree with others regarding your good work.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
pwasser wrote: This one has been around for a long time.
I see...
pwasser wrote: I agree with others regarding your good work.
Thank you, Peter!
- Sebastian
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I don't get it. Please enlighten me. Also I don't think I included anything in this conversation, I just replied apart from my initial suggestion which I don't think is what you're aiming at here.
edit: In case your link doesn't open the search that you meant to show to me and you're talking about posting "we don't do your homework" as an answer instead of a comment - yes, I also have posted some as answers. But I decided to stop and did stop doing that well before posting here. As you can read from my rep history graph, my activity here doesn't reach that far back yet and I hadn't formed an opinion on that until then.
Recursion: see Recursion.
modified 18-Mar-15 14:19pm.
|
|
|
|
|
10-4
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Bill,
thank you very much for your kind compliment! It's nice to see it gets recognition 
I have to agree with your objection to my suggestion. Your proposed solution is fairer.
cheers! Sebastian
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
I saw the question and answers and am puzzled how it could have been deemed a poor question. In fact I was expecting some discussion on it.
Perhaps as questions are answered and voted on it should become progressively harder to remove them.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
I totally understand your concern,but its more difficult to handle than you think. If we stop removing such posts, QA will be full of crap(It's already on its way though). If we start removing such posts,what about the comments/Answers provided?
One common solution would be to apply moderation queue here as well.
- Question posted
- Comments added
- Solutions posted
- 3 reports and question gets closed. This comes to moderation queue
- It can than be reopened by X-votes.
Moderation queue will display full thread,including each comment/solution(Just like normal question). If it gets enough votes to close, it will be closed immediately otherwise it will be reopened.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: If we stop removing such posts, QA will be full of crap
I, personally, wouldn't consider the question linked "crap". Maybe there isn't one clear solution to it, and maybe the forums would have been better suited for that discussion, but this is a general issue with codeproject.
What I would like to see is:
Quick Answers: Specific questions (e.g. "How can I fix the error I get when doing X?", etc.)
Discussion forums: discussions about language features and algorithms where no definitive answer is expected or even possible.
How should a new member (or one who doesn't frequent the site often) know where to ask questions when there are two locations?
I think the problem is that both kind of questions are asked in both locations. Probably because the forums have been sticking around for longer and have been used for questions since the beginning. Codeproject is a great resource when it comes to articles (and tips) and offers an okay platform for asking questions and getting answers to it but I find it kinda sad, that it isn't really a platform for discussions about coding.
I occasionally take a look at questions in the QA and some of the forums, but keep myself mostly out of as I think it's currently just a big mess...
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: it's currently just a big mess.
That's all i wanted to say...
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
But you can't resolve that by just closing or deleting such questions.
Maybe the most "simple" (disregarding the work inflicted on Chris  ) solution would be to add the possibility to move those questions from the QA to the discussion forums (or vice versa) where either
a member with a certain amount of reputation (authority and/or organiser?) can either vote to move it or move it directly, or the user posting the question may do so. (Maybe add a button to the question where other users can click so the poster gets notified that the question might be better suited in the discussion forums, etc.)
|
|
|
|
|
Nicholas Marty wrote: But you can't resolve that by just closing or deleting such questions.
That's the reason i suggested the moderation queue so 'debatable' questions can be reopened. Inshort, theres still possibility that it can be discussed.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Rohan,
I think your idea is practical in the sense it puts the burden for the work of "resurrection" of closed posts onto the membership, rather than CP staff.
Another "thorny" issue I see is: how one can change the behavior of certain very high-rep frequent QA respondents who post frequent "solutions" that are nothing more than "sermons," or "lectures," that, at best, fumigate with technical rhetoric and very general advice the OP's question. That such "solutions" seem to almost auto-magically get a 5 vote within minutes of their posting is an interesting phenom.
I am as concerned about the issue of how we "elevate" excellent, stand-out, content so it "floats above" the great churning cosmic ocean of "other."
Does the rating/rep system as it is now encourage/enable that optimally ?
cheers, Bill
«To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"
|
|
|
|
|
Bob ![Green Alien | [Alien]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/alien.gif)
in teddy bear form.
I would definitely buy one ! (for my son of course  )
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure if a 3D-incarnation of Bob could be G-rated 
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-rated = appropriate for children, as opposed to X-rated
Recursion: see Recursion.
|
|
|
|
|
ah...  .
Not sure why you think that, but I doubt it would be a problem 
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Moderator,
Whenever, I tried to cast my vote for article or forum reply, I am getting:
Someone at your IP address has already voted for this item
Not understand, why it is coming. I am using a public computer from Cyber Café. My doubt is that all systems are having same IP. If it is so. Does this mean I never cast a vote or if I cast my vote then someone else who will be sitting on the same system would not be able to cast the vote.
Any suggestion!
|
|
|
|
|
I believe this message is delivering accurate information. Someone at that Cyber Cafe must really like the same articles as you.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I believe this message is delivering accurate information. Someone at that Cyber Cafe must really like the same articles as you.
I agreed with you. I just asked one fellow sitting next to my system and I am able to replicate this.
My question - isn't it negative for a writer who submitted the article. I know writers are doing best at Code project and by casting a vote people like me are encourage their work.
Suppose in a day 5 persons tried for vote a same article and actually only one person able to vote successfully, which means that article got loss of 4 votes (loss is not monetary meaning here).
|
|
|
|
|
The system is designed the way it is so that people can't cheat their votes. We continually make changes to the voting system to make sure it is as fair as possible and accurate to members reading those articles.
I have no doubt that the good articles by our talented authors will be receive plenty of legitimate votes.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, I don't want to debate here. But, I am still in doubt.
Anyways, thanks a ton for quick reply.
|
|
|
|
|
The probability that several developers visit CP from the same Ciber Cafe is much, much, much, but very much lower than the probability of people trying to fool the system and farm reputation in a not legitime way (i.e. socket puppets)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
