|
anybody knows where I can download source code for dissecting a C# application book?
I google it and the links for APRESS.com does not work anymore.
really want to get the source code for this book and exercise it.
thanks a million
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
What's the title of the book?
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
Just a shot in the dark here, but "Dissecting a C# Application", perhaps?
|
|
|
|
|
yes, the title is "dissecting a C# application" with subtitle "Inside SharpDevelop" I believe.
I bought this book in 2004 but did not download source code when Wrox was hot company. later on Wrox was sold...
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
That will get you the IDE. If you want code from the book, it looks like you're out of luck.
The Apress Dowload page states:
Where can I find source code for a pre-2003 Wrox published book?
We’re sorry, but we no longer carry or support source code for titles published by Wrox prior to 2003, and subsequently acquired by Apress.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there.
I understand, however, the book is about the design and implementation of SharpDevelop, the IDE you mention.
The website has older source code as well as the newest updates to SharpDevelop. I don't know if they offer the oldest stuff for direct download, but they do have a forum too.
It's a start...
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
Hi.
The link here:
http://community.sharpdevelop.net/forums/t/12265.aspx[^]
still works -- I just tested it myself.
As I mentioned earlier, the website has old stuff and newer updates. The forum posting at the link above suggests that the code at the download matches the book, which should make studying the old code easier. The dates inside the .zip appear to be consistent with that claim.
Enjoy.
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
my salute to you!
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
yes, I like to look at windows form designer architecture and figure out how to write my own..
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Little hint, for further reading: There are also some good articles about SharpDevelop here on CodeProject, which cover its Core and Add-In System as well as the AvalonEdit text editor. Simply search for "SharpDevelop". Just in case you didn't know yet. 
|
|
|
|
|
thank you!
I mainly want to look at windows form designer chapter and play around with it.
any new info to share?
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I think the source code published with the book might be too outdated, I can't even remember if they had a complete and working implementation of a Form Designer back then (which was around v1.0?). You could go and check out the current source code on GitHub, the Forms Designer is implemented as an AddIn (in the folder src/AddIns/DisplayBinding/FormsDesigner) and it should be pretty solid already since most of the effort in recent years was in the XAML/WPF area.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The official repository is on Github[^]
but if all you want is a forms designer then this article[^] may be what you need.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
thank you very much! your input is very helpful.
diligent hands rule....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Karel Čapek wrote: Such clever little primates.
I think it's a race to see if we can get a self-sustainable colony somewhere before we kill this planet.
Clever indeed. 
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
You've been reading the drivel we post in Soap Box 1.0! 
|
|
|
|
|
I've been reading about new(ish) / less used languages a bit lately and the two that I've come across often are Go and Rust. There's lost of information about strengths and weaknesses, similarities and differences of each, but I haven't been able to find any discussions about them here on CodeProject so I'd appreciate opinions (if any) about them from you people. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Go seems to me like a variant of C with some extra "stuff that doesn't interest me that much". Also the hype seems to have mostly cooled down.
Rust has some cool tricks, interesting type system, I'm not really sure about the faint "functional smell" though.
|
|
|
|
|
More or less my impressions too. They probably appeal to me because they are both compiled languages.
|
|
|
|
|
Go is as usefull and interesting as Esperanto.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Kial vi diras tion? 
|
|
|
|
|
Can't answer, the question is written in a deprecated langauge.
--
Many more programming-labnguages have been invented and forgotten. Go got traction because it is pushed by Google and because some academics jumped on the wagon, but "that's it".
Microsoft knows how to push those things - there's tons of documentation on .NET, with out of the box bindings to WinForms and very easy database-access.
Languages come and Go, only the usefull remain.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
