|
So I should learn me some of those? 
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe,
Stack shifts off the compiler in Oberon,
I've seen java beans glitter in the framework by a TTL gate.
All these...moments...will be disposed in time,
like threads in a pool.
Time ... to compile[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely love that film and quote, excellent paraphrasing 
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
COBOL.. studied in college; don't miss it.
Fortran... used from 1986 to about 2005 in industry.. fond memories.
As much as people love to hate BASIC (and its progeny), it is still a work horse of the industry. I may not like using VBA to automate some tasks, but, with the 3rd party tools I use, they chose VBA as the scripting engine... so, use it I do.
|
|
|
|
|
My two cents for asking to some female scientist the name of the future languages. Looks like the en hadn't much fantasy...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ummm... What?! "Microsoft’s widely popular 1985 version was called Turbo Pascal."
|
|
|
|
|
That was my thought exactly (see following post).
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I particularly like the line:
"Microsoft’s widely popular 1985 version was called Turbo Pascal."
Perfect in every way, except accuracy. Initially released in 1983, by Borland.
(If Bloomberg's accuracy can be measured by the likes of this article, on a field I know about, it is no wonder our financial systems are up the creek without a paddle).
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Many software developers are cribbing code, and its flaws, that someone else created. And the problem is only getting harder to keep up with. Ctrl+V considered harmful?
Or for you cranky old folk, Ctrl+Ins
|
|
|
|
|
Another reason copy/paste is ushering the slow decline of humanity.
|
|
|
|
|
It is true that using code coming from made by others means you are inheriting their flaws. But if the developers did everything from scratch, would they have a better result, or even more flaws (of all kinds, including security vulnerabilities)?
One of the reasons to use code made by others is that "such code was created by experts on those areas and was largely tested" and it would be extremely difficult to do a better job.
I am not saying it is impossible but it is far from being a reality for most programmers and companies.
|
|
|
|
|
Paulo Zemek wrote: One of the reasons to use code made by others is that "such code was created by experts on those areas and was largely tested" and it would be extremely difficult to do a better job.
Like this[^]? Or this[^]? Or this[^]?
Seriously, for the love of bacon, don't follow any of those tutorials!
Many "experts" don't have to first idea how to write secure code. They churn out tutorials explaining how to do things in the least secure way possible, and thousands of novice developers copy the code verbatim, without taking the time to understand the code or check for vulnerabilities.
And when people who do know better try to point out the flaws in the tutorial's code, we're generally ignored. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Actually I wasn't even talking about copying code... but about using libraries.
I personally love to "reinvent" the wheel, be it because of performance concerns, security concerns or simply to learn how those things work internally.
Yet, many developers really prefer to get already made code and, if they can't find, they will do an even less secure implementation. No, I am not saying that "copying from others" will be good. I am saying that allowing developers that are simply not of that domain to do it will be even worse.
Also note that I quoted that "such code was created by experts on those areas and was largely tested" by a reason. That's the belief to use code made by others. I don't agree with the statement as is.
|
|
|
|
|
Shift+Ins, Ctrl+Ins, Shift+Del
It's still painful using a keyboard where I can't use those shortcuts.
|
|
|
|
|
IMHO, This is possible if only if they do a system that entirely depends on other people work and couldn't or less possible way testing it.
|
|
|
|
|
When taking over a project with new technology, most companies won't give time to learn it, we have to research with Google in the initial stage while study it in our own free time and go back to fix any inadequacies. The problem is some developers (even the senior ones) always rely on copy and paste without understanding or making effort to study in depth the technologies they are using.
|
|
|
|
|
<nag> It's Shift+Ins that resembles Ctrl+V. </nag>
Ciao,
luker
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, it's been a while. Actually never, as I started on a CUA interface.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Even though Windows 10 and Windows 10 Mobile are part of the same "One" product strategy, the two feel like two separate projects at Microsoft. It's not like anyone uses Windows Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
For many tech companies the race is on to build ever smaller computer processors, but one British man has gone in the opposite direction. Unfortunately, he'll have to build a giant keyboard before using it
|
|
|
|
|
Bah! You have to use relays! Kids these days...
|
|
|
|
|
The Fan is Canonical’s answer to the container networking challenge. We recognised that container networking is unusual, and quite unlike true software-defined networking, in that the number of containers you want on each host is probably roughly the same. You want to run a couple hundred containers on each VM. You also don’t (in the docker case) want to live migrate them around, you just kill them and start them again elsewhere. Essentially, what you need is an address multiplier – anywhere you have one interface, it would be handy to have 250 of them instead.
Marky Mark could've thought of a better name on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
No matter how genius a new application is, it is still required to go through testers’ hands. And despite the important role testers play, they remain in the shadows. When developers become aware of the variety of tests their software must endure, it often forces them to rethink the way they develop their software—in a good way.
"Andy buffed those shoes to a high, mirror shine..."
|
|
|
|
|
One storage provider compiles failure rates for major hard drive vendors and a pattern emerges. Ten minutes before your backup starts, or just before the deadline on that project
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Badger | [badger,badger,badger,badger...]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/badger.gif)
