|
Nope. Its not. Just buy a bag of chips!
|
|
|
|
|
According to a scuba diving website here in the UK air is definitely not free.
BTW 300 bar is the same as 4,351 psi and people put them on their backs 
How much does a fill cost?
"The standard price for air fills are £7.00 for 232 Bar and £8.00 for 300 Bar fills. Divers producing valid dive certification of ID cards qualify for a 50% off their air fill costs (£3.50 for 232 Bar and £4.00 for 300 Bar)
|
|
|
|
|
My grandpa used the say if the government could figure out a way to tax air, they would charge us for it.
As far as I'm concerned, so-called carbon taxes are just that.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm sure that they'd sell for the same price if they were vacuum packed but who wants a packet of potato dust?
|
|
|
|
|
Baby owl taking a bath in a tub.[^]
Looks just like a rubber ducky!
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
If you tell me there's a crocodile involved, I might watch it.
|
|
|
|
|
Here you go.[^]
Enough alligators for you?
The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here
This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a f***ing golf cart.
"I don't know, extraterrestrial?"
"You mean like from space?"
"No, from Canada."
If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
This would have been MUCH better had the alligator gotten lunch!
|
|
|
|
|
You must have some very weird rubber duckies in your bathroom! 
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have any. Never have. I know one person (who is 23) that has over 900,000 rubber duckies (as of August 2014). Don't ask why. I don't know.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I do C# and WPF work. I don't know what they did to the XAML parser in VS2015, but it flat out stinks. It blue squiggles pretty much everything intermittently, gives random / incorrect errors intermittently, etc. There are a few other nitpicks in the general environment, but this is pretty much unusable. Very disappointed. Any other WPF people seeing the same thing?
|
|
|
|
|
Installed it last weekend, not sure I even want to fire it up based on the early feedback. I want to use it for the Xamarin integration but 99% of my work is in WPF shudder
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
I still use 2010
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Luddite 
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
It works well and doesn't look like MS DOS 3.1
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
If you like VS 2010 then 2013 is fine with the blue theme. I hated the default grey. But now I love VS 2013.
I've installed VS 2015 but not really used it yet besides running a Hello World console app. I always do that as a sanity check after an install.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
I will keep using Windows 7, Office 2010, and VS2010 until Microsoft makes something better, but I am beginning to think that I will have to wait quite a long time... 
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: I still use 2010
I developed my final year project in VS2010, it really works well.
Using VS2012 these days on work place, VS12 too is cool
Ain't intend to use VS2015 in future
|
|
|
|
|
Brittle1618 wrote: Ain't intend
I don't intend...
Sorry, but that was bad. 
|
|
|
|
|
Oh thats perfectly alright
thanks for correction 
|
|
|
|
|
I converted to VS 2013 recently(from 2010).
It is well worth the upgrade.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was still using VS2008 for my own projects until recently. By choice.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just using it on my personal side project, so I probably use it maybe 3 hrs a week tops. If I had to use it 8 hrs a day for my work (especially if it was 99% WPF), I'd be hatin'... From one WPF guy to another, I would not use this in a professional environment right now. Too buggy still.
I do like the runtime "Spy++" type tool that can hyperlink to the element in the XAML... kind of cool, but also kind of kludge to use with the weird focus behavior. Switching properties at runtime? I guess if you're debugging something that's hard to repro...
I would call VS2013 "rock solid"... if that is the basis for a "10", I'd give this a 2 or 3 in the WPF areas.
|
|
|
|
|
SledgeHammer01 wrote: I would not use this in a professional environment right now
That is certainly not going to happen, EVERY tool goes through evaluation before it is allowed into the selected product list and they have no sense of urgency on any product.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
