|
This article[^] contains link to source code but it is offsite (something GitHub link), does it allowed ? I have marked that article as 'offsite download'
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
They are not, and reporting it as you did is the correct action.
|
|
|
|
|
Annoyingly some idiots have approved this article despite my outstanding questions to the author which needed clarification including, which license agreement really applies and could the author please attach a copy of the code to the article.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I've reached out the author to help straighten it all out.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Does that include the license for it? And could you reach out to whoever approved it and deliver mighty slaps?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I'm speaking to him about the license as well. I'm not sure there are mighty slaps to give on this one, near as I can tell it was community approved. Chris and I are talking about changes to prevent this kind of thing from happening. In the meantime your reports and requests for mighty slaps are very valuable.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: I'm not sure there are mighty slaps to give on this one, near as I can tell it was community approved.
Shirley you're not telling us that you don't know who's doing the approval. Please, please tell me it isn't so!
|
|
|
|
|
In most cases I can see who approved something. If it was community based I should be able to see a list of people who made reports on it. If it is an editor or trusted author (in most cases, myself or Chris or Deeksha), then I can see which one of us it was, but if we remove the reports on the article during that process, I can no longer see which community members approved it / reported on it. There seems to be an edge case where (as in this scenario) it says it's approved by an editor or trusted author but I cannot see an editor tied to it. I'm wondering if there's a scenario where a trusted author is actually reporting the article with a negative report and somehow this is getting counted as an approval. We don't have a lot of trusted authors, though, as far as I know. Certainly not active ones who tend to make reports on the article queue.
Obviously this isn't the intended ideal of seeing reports and approvals on articles in the queue, but as I said, we're making changes.
http://i.imgur.com/NagQ02y.jpg[^]
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
It would be worth to consider to make that approval list visible for a group of people as I already suggested in a couple of times. Please take it in consideration with Chris
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: but if we remove the reports on the article during that process, I can no longer see which community members approved it / reported on it.
I believe I can see an error here, they should not be removed, just set to Inactive.
|
|
|
|
|
Message[^]
Luser[^]
Other messages[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
This: [Removed at request of Sean]
From this: [Removed at request of Sean]
Contains chunks copied from here: Introduction to Cookies - The Cookie Crunch[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 3-Feb-16 10:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
11 years ... he's been a member of CodeProject longer than I have. I'd like to slap on the wrist this one. Can we please hold off the firing squad for now? I've removed the article and explained the circumstances to the author.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
I've removed the links to article and author from the original post.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you kindly.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
If the articles/tips are really "Copied" by any author, but if the member is from long time with CP (if his contribution is also good) then we should not fired him directly, Instead we can intimate/explained him about that.
obviously this case should be applied on old members only
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
koolprasad2003 wrote: but obviously this case should be applied on old members only
No way
Exactly due to the "old user" they should know about the rules better than newbies and be aware of them
If the hamsters consider it worth, they can reinstaurate the account.
In this very case I read Sean's Request to not report and I respect it, but in usual mode... I will report plagiarism no matter if old user or new one.
The only gray zone for me would be, if the user has been really very active contributing with quality items just in case he forgot to give credits. But in this case a slow and deep check on all his contributions would be the next action. If we find a second piece copied... then no mercy
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12305302 - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 3-Feb-16 19:27pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
