|
|
Daredevil + Frank Miller = Wow!
Daredevil + just about anyone else = meh
I watched the first couple of episodes of the first season, and lost interest. Is the second season an improvement?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Daredevil + Frank Miller = Wow!
Agree.
There are lots of good Daredevil comics out there... not all of them, but some small jewels here and there.
The second season is the right step forward from the first one.
The first one is presenting the hero, it is very nice when Stick appears and the ninja thing appears on scene. From there it is nice to see the series.
I like better the second season than the first one.
There is a really nice fight scene on a building stairs which is really nice as it tries to be on the very same sequence.
Give it a try and probably you'll like it.
I enjoyed it.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll give it a go -- I'm getting precious little for my subscription money, so far, so I might as well try it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Hope you enjoy it! there are plenty of details in the second season that make it worth.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just up to episode 4. So far so good.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
You have already seen the episode 3 fight scene at the stairs...
And you still have not... 
|
|
|
|
|
Well it's got an 8.8 IMDB rating so it's clearly not just you but I have remained immune to its charms. But then I never read the comic either. I'm more of an X-Men kinda guy.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
Just try it.
Several times Daredevil has worked together with Logan as they share a strong relationship with Japan and a taste for ninja killing...
|
|
|
|
|
Er, yeah.
A ratings system that gives the walking dead 8.6 and breaking bad 9.5 is the same kind of ratings system that caused the 2008 crash.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 is very good. Anything above 8 on IMDB is top notch. Breaking Bad is just a freak.
I am not a number. I am a ... no, wait!
|
|
|
|
|
So the walking dead got 8.6 because of votes from somnambulists and the brain dead?
OK, that's not ironic.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Well to be fair Breaking Bad started off very well, but got progressively worse and maybe people gave those votes when it was still good. I don't see many people give fair marks to any series. Let's take Supernatural as an example. It's very popular and the story was very good to about the end of season 6/7. It has 8.6 on IMDB and the first few seasons are really good, you have monster of the week format and a bit of story behind it, then the "main" story picks up, with a few funny episodes to ease the tension. All in all well connected and even though it's not completely fresh, it's very entertaining. But if you would judge Supernatural by what it is now... it doesn't even go beyond 5 for me. They just rehash everything they did in earlier seasons. How do you mark it then? By it's previous success or by the bad series it has become?
Saying that, I'm not sure how the Walking Dead got 8.6.
|
|
|
|
|
RUs123 wrote: Saying that, I'm not sure how the Walking Dead got 8.6.
Because a load of zombies voted it up, presumably.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
We're off on an animal adventure, you say? Alpaca my bags!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Lama just fetch your coat for you! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
I'd just like a chance to prove that money can't make me happy.
Me, all the time
|
|
|
|
|
What kind of bees do you not pay for? Free bees
What kind of bees make milk? Boo bees
When you help a gator? Gator aid
|
|
|
|
|
If a message doesn't appear immediately, please don't just post it again!
Both of these were caught by the automated spam detector as "possibly dodgy post" and required human intervention to accept them.
And I had to accept them both so that you wouldn't get a swift kick as a spammer, and then manually delete one afterwards!
I know it's annoying when it doesn;t appear, but give it a little time rather than reposting immediately, please?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You gonna hit the lynx when you get there?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Fer sure - 'cos he's crazy like a fox, hungry as a horse and tired as a dog!
/ravi
|
|
|
|
|
I am just Perusing this thread for ideas...
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't sound like a baaaaaad plan!
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
So I have been diving into mobile app development lately and so far it has been pretty fun. I've jumped around and learned a good bit of native Android and iOS (Swift of course) as well as Ionic (hybrid, cordova) apps. I want to master one of these, but I'm not sure which.
Native iOS development has been fun. The Swift language seem really great. I love the tooling options available as well.The problem here is two things. #1 I HATE Objective-C, but it still seems necessary to know. #2 is the cost. I have to have a Mac, a developer licences, and will want and iPhone and potentially other hardware. I can get the money, but not for a good few months. Also, I feel like there are so many good iOS developers my age, so I would saturate the field.
Native Android is cool too. Google services and tooling are awesome too. Android, however, has too many developers my age ranging from really good to really bad. Also, I fell that everyone has an i-device, and that I would loose so many potential users mastering Android development. Plus I'm fearing that Android is going to switch off of Java soon and that half of the tooling will be obsolete.
Ionic has been really fun too. In fact, a friend and me were able to push out a good looking PoC in about a week. It is really easy since my background is a web developer, but it seems that Hybrid gets left out when it comes to tooling and services. I also feel that if I can't / don't develop for watch's in a few years, I won't be very useful. Cordova can integrate with watch devices, but it is very ghetto. I also feel like Cordova and Hybrid apps will be obsolete in 10 years or so.
I know that I always could go and master all three, but it would probably end up being too much work and not worth it in the end. Which of these do y'all think I should go and master.
i cri evry tiem
|
|
|
|
|
James_Parsons wrote: know that I always could go and master all three, but it would probably end up being too much work and not worth it in the end. Which of these do y'all think I should go and master.
jack of all trades, master of none.
You CAN'T possibly 'master' all of them. I'd pick the one you like the most and stick with it, because if you really like it, then it's not really work.
And oh, your age is irrelevant. I'm 50, been coding for 30 years, and I'm still at it. Learning something new is a daily experience.
Code on!
If it's not broken, fix it until it is
|
|
|
|
|
Kevin Marois wrote: Learning something new is a daily experience
Damn right!
The day you stop learning, is the day you die - either mentally or physically.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
