|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well spotted. 
For anyone else who's struggling to see it: the same spam link he posted in the "Hosting and Servers" forum[^] is hiding in item #7.
Based on his bio, he works for the company he's linking to.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
Any ideas why mariazingzing - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^] is top of the pops in QA? I can't see any recent answers. (Or have they all disappeard down the spam chute?)
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Probably because his old answers has been upvoted during the last 24 hours.
Smells like sock puppet voting but the sum of points indicates that at least one voter has a higher reputation.
|
|
|
|
|
Did you check the rep graph? There was a similar authority spike back in 2012.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I checked it but did not recognised the spike from 2012. So it looks like both spikes are due to voting by a platinum authority member.
I did not viewed all answers but it looks like someone is counter voting now (which is silly from my point of view).
|
|
|
|
|
@BillWoodrufff and I have both noticed recently that we have had a raft of our answers upvoted for no apparent reason (there's a thread [^] in the Lounge about it). There used to be a phantom downvoter, seems we now have a phantom upvoter!
|
|
|
|
|
I remember the thread and can second (or third?) such upvoting. It happened with my answers too but for recent ones only (not older than a week).
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I agree this one looks a little more socky.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem I see is that ... based on looking at four or five of this poster's answers ... their posts are mainly a solution consisting of a single link.
I agree, this one is suspicious.
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
They're back at the top again - there was a raft of upvotes noted in the comments below, followed by a raft of down-votes (also noted below). Now it would seem that the upvoter(s) or sock-puppet if it is a problem is going back around up-voting all of their answers again.
@sean-ewington - can you see what is going on?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
