|
Yeah, but it really was a shark and it bit off the last n. 
|
|
|
|
|
Then why isn't it Finnland rather than Finland? 
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
English speling is hard. 
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
In that case, it doesn't matter
veni bibi saltavi
|
|
|
|
|
That's very insensitive of him.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
PeejayAdams wrote: Can Klingon's Swim?
Only if there's toilet paper nearby...
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Those are the questions that matter! 
I often get distracted by those hot questions.
What I like most about it is that there are people who, in all seriousness, answer such questions like they are experts on the subject
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: What I like most about it is that there are people who, in all seriousness, answer such questions like they are experts on the subject
I was rather hoping for something like this:
< 98 > It is widely maintained that the reference to Ky'Trrk visiting Ny'Akkk on the planet Disfaros (DS9, Episode 578, Act I, Scene IV) implies that Ky'Trrk must have swam to the island on which Ny'Akkk was living. The usual logic supplied is that episode 578 was set on Star Date 9293.234 and the Klingon's didn't invent bridges until Star Date 9296.345.
This thinking, however, is clearly fallacious. Whilst there wouldn't have been a bridge, it is perfectly possible that Ky'Trrk had a pair of hover boots rendering the lack of bridges completely moot.
Scotty 2M+
+10 @Scotty: Nonsense, Klingons did not have hover boots until they defeated the Romulans in the Zeta Zone. T'Pau 458,456
+926 @T'Pau: But the Klingon's did have time travel in 9293.234 so it would have been easy for Ky'Trrk to travel forwards in time and get the hover boots. KirkFan97 26,382
+483 @KirkFan97: Pish, tish and tosh! The anti-grav mechanism of the hover boots could not survive reverse travel in time as the intrograspulator would become demagnitised by the photonic effect of the radyonic crystals. This can be succinctly described by the equation x:R⊢P(x)and⊢(∀x:R)P(x) which clearly proves that hover boots are only available to a maximum size of 12, whereas it is postulated by Postlethwaite and Gibbs in their definitive text Shoe Sizes of the Star Trek Universe that no adult Klingon has feet smaller than size 14. Uhura93 45, 234
Oi! Comments are not a place for extended discussion - MardyModerator 9M
Due to the low quality of answers yadda yadda yadda ...
|
|
|
|
|
Diabolical chef's creation is sinful at heart (8)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm hoping it isn't "FIENDISH" ... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
... in which case, you'll be happy to hear that it isn't fiendish.
|
|
|
|
|
So it's a little more fiendish than I thought?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
On a scale of fiendishness where 1 is a hamster and 10 is a lawyer's accountant's accountant, I'd probably give it about 3 and a half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can't see the YT link from here, but I do hope that it's Tales From the Riverbank!
|
|
|
|
|
The Hamster Song[^]
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I would argue that chefs don't create them, they just put food on them, but chefs would argue back.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They would - and not too many people have ever won an argument with a chef.
I rather suspect that you have the solution ...
|
|
|
|
|
Ghoulish??
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, not ghoulish. An answer which has giving me a sudden craving for goulash. Can we please stop talking about food?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duncan Edwards Jones wrote: Devilish?
(Evil in Dish)
Yay! We have a winner (even that rhymes with dinner - there's just no getting away from food today!)
|
|
|
|
|
Would you develop a website using Microsoft tools, with all the incredible learning curve and expense? Or would you just go the easy - but effective - route and use the WordPress solution your client's hosting provider offers as a development platform?
I've got the Microsoft tools in Visual Studio, and I've got the Adobe tools in the Creative Suite, and I'm not too fond of either. I can use them, but it's a huge effort, usually on my own time, to get up to speed and fairly proficient after a long break. My new employer needs a website that works - it's currently crippled with almost no functionality - and I'm the only one to do it. The current site was done with WordPress, but never completed. And some of their suppliers offer APIs to link with their online ordering systems to make sales on behalf of the affiliate members. Most of those are written using WordPress, so I'm going to have to deal with that sometime...
Given that there's going to be a huge learning curve for me to come up to speed on modern versions of any of these platforms, which would you recommend that I choose for my employer's new website?
Will Rogers never met me.
|
|
|
|
|
If it's already half-done in wordpress, why triple your pain?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on if it's done well or not I'd say.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
