|
You make it sound so simple, and missed the best edition of pain...
Next step: deploy that app to other peoples macs! Including the non tech savvy users and other versions of osx.
As always when 2 evil empires clash: nobody wins.
Sin tax!!!
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: You make it sound so simple,
That's funny, because as complicated as my version sounds, you are right, it is still the simplified version.
Lopatir wrote: As always when 2 evil empires clash:
It does seem that way.
|
|
|
|
|
That's simple payback for buying a mac! 
|
|
|
|
|
DaveAuld wrote: That's simple payback for buying a mac!
You are right. It's my secondary machine used for iOS App dev.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to run your .Net app self-hosted from the console[^]
The article level might be a bit below yours, but eventually you can earn something from it - Took me a while to gather all those infos.
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi (SFC) wrote: You might want to run your .Net app self-hosted
I noticed that self-hosted choice and thought that might be the way to go. I was just trying to get this going to see how it works and see what I would get from it. From my perspective...not much.
|
|
|
|
|
Yet ASP.NET Core is first a complete revision of how web apps are structured and developed, and second only is the cross platform bonus.
|
|
|
|
|
Financially, running ASP.NET Core web apps in a Ubuntu Docker container can save you money (CPU cycles) compared to running your apps in a full blown Windows server VM (in Azure, AWS, etc, at least).
It also gives you the freedom to deploy anywhere, even to your own machine, regardless of the host OS.
Ah, I see you have the machine that goes ping. This is my favorite. You see we lease it back from the company we sold it to and that way it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Brent Jenkins wrote: running ASP.NET Core web apps in a Ubuntu Docker container can save you money (CPU cycles) compared to running your apps in a full blown Windows
Now that's a good idea and a good explanation of a possible benefit that could occur.
I have a DigitialOcean droplet running Debian so if I could get an ASP.NET web app running there, I would be quite happy. Great insight. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I'm surprised that's not the USP they're pushing out there.
Nobody (apart from us developers) really cares what platform code is developed on, but getting the biggest bang for your dollar is going to be important to anyone running any kind of online service.
Ah, I see you have the machine that goes ping. This is my favorite. You see we lease it back from the company we sold it to and that way it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account.
modified 31-Aug-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Brent Jenkins wrote: I'm surprised that's not the USP they're pushing out there.
Right. I was like meh about the whole thing until you helped me connect the dots on running in a container.
I'm (hopefully) going to try it soon just to see how feasible it is and how well it'll perform on my little Debian droplet.
|
|
|
|
|
Brady Kelly wrote: ASP.NET Core is first a complete revision of how web apps are structured
Good point.
That's actually the reason I was investigating this. I feel the same way about that -- that it's more of a restructuring of their web app structure and development going forward.
|
|
|
|
|
On Friday we lost one of Britain's greatest and most prolific actors, John Hurt, CBE.
Rest In Peace.
We will miss you Mr. Ollivander (Harry Potter), The War Doctor (Doctor Who), Kane (Alien), Quentin Crisp (The Naked Civil Servant), Winston Smith (1984), Harold Oxley (Indiana Jones) and lots of other roles.
![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
modified 29-Jan-17 15:49pm.
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason I looked him up on my phone recently and he's been the first thing popping up when I enter Chrome for a while now...
Lots of awesome movies.
And he was still making them at 77, not bad!
|
|
|
|
|
A great actor with a classic stage voice.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
One of the greatest. R.I.P John Hurt ![Rose | [Rose]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
After installing VS 2017 RC and using it briefly, the following comment:
This RC version is very light on resources. It is not the slow, cumbersome resource hog that we had in the 2015 Community edition. It takes up a fraction of the disk space compared to 2015 and loads faster.
XAML Styler:
I am quite impressed with this third party tool that can be installed for the 2017 version. Using it enables you to standardize aspects like indentation in XAML files in a flash. You can find it here: (There are versions available for earlier releases of VS as well.)
XAML Styler[^]
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
modified 29-Jan-17 14:41pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Cornelius Henning wrote: This RC version is very light on resources.
As it was explained by Microsoft, they broke the VS package to small pieces to make it load faster... Now a lot of things were previously loaded at the startup will be added (by you probably) as extensions and will be loaded on request...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
That makes sense, thanks!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: Now a lot of things were previously loaded at the startup
And this is what they should do with the OS and all their other software!
|
|
|
|
|
Disagree. You and I can deal with being frequently prompted to add/enable/whatever additional features without trouble. So can anyone who should be allowed to program (although obviously the idiots who get their questions flamed to death in QA or deleted on SO show there's a large gap between who should and who tries to program). The world of clueless people OTOH can't be trusted to push even a single button. That sort of complexifying is way too much for them. And would be even if we could ignore all the existing executables that assume they have every windows feature present by default and don't need to request they be enabled before calling them.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Hmmm, sounding promising.
makes me strongly consider waiting a couple more years and just skip 15. The installer was still include-everything-regardless, and on use (testing) sometimes felt like paddling a cast iron canoe shaped like a brick sh*thouse through a puddle of piss.
Sure the new 15 features are nice, but nothing vital right now and for some clients off the table anyway.
Sin tack ear lol
Pressing the any key may be continuate
|
|
|
|
|
I installed it couple of days ago, Should we have to attach the process manually when debugging?
And Unable to start IIS express also.
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த
நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
|
|
|
|
|
Been using it several months now and very happy with it.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
