|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are identical, bar trivial spacing changes. If you put them side-by-side on a monitor, you can page through them, and it's pretty obvious. A couple of the images are taller, but they contain no new info.
I'd agree: farming.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
They both came through as feeds from their blogs - so it may not have been intentional. Probably best to wait for Sean to have a word with them before reporting the user.
Having said that, they are both pretty poor quality - they are a typical example of the "do this, then that" with no explanation type of thing we have been seeing a lot of lately. I actually reported them as "Extremely poor quality" (as I do with all of those style of articles) when they first popped up.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
Midi_Mick wrote: They both came through as feeds from their blogs - so it may not have been intentional.
I agree with you - But blog posts need to be tagged explicitly in order to be consumed by CP, and I see it as the blog owner/writer's responsibility to tag his/her stuff correctly.
|
|
|
|
|
Blasting away an author just for incorrectly tagging his blog's article seems a bit... draconian.
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not requesting a blast-away for anyone here.
One thing is my OP, typeof( question ) - It's certainly rep point farming, but the circumstances are unclear, thus the actions are yet to be decided upon - Preferably with a Staff Editor involved, which is why Sean is tagged there.
The second thing is my personal opinion on tagging one's stuff correctly, and who's responsibility this duty is. I've never mentioned to blast the account solely because of the mis-tagged posts. More precisely I never mentioned blasting the member anywhere in any of my posts in this thread, because of aforementioned circumstances in thing one (TM)
|
|
|
|
|
Marco Bertschi (SFC) wrote: I'm not requesting a blast-away for anyone here.
Marco Bertschi (SFC) wrote: OP, typeof( question )
Marco Bertschi (SFC) wrote: I never mentioned blasting the member anywhere in any of my posts in this thread,
Unfortunately it does not matter. Too many people come to this forum, see a post, and start reporting without reading what you post. Ironically, I'm sure there are people who come to this forum simply to get rep points by reporting members.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
modified 8-Mar-17 6:45am.
|
|
|
|
|
(leans in to whisper) Reporting accounts would be small potatoes for rep farming. The big fish are the ones that report questions. (vanishes into smoke)
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
While that is true, it's not supposed to be like that - I strongly think that this forum also should be a place to discuss edge cases, and request assistance from the staff if it is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
Very much agreed. 
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Unfortunately it does not matter. Too many people come to this forum, see a post, and start reporting without reading what you post.
That's why the subject of the post is so important. I usually start such "question" or "debate" threads with "DO NOT REPORT -". If still missused, at least CP Staff can have a look and wipe the reports or give a slap between the ears to the "too quick fingers"
RyanDev wrote: Iroinically, I'm sure there are people who come to this forum simply to get rep points by reporting members.
Quite probably. But not only here, a big part of the trash, fast answers, bad quality apportations and many other things is just to get rep.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've emailed her. Let's see what she says. Maybe it was a whoopsy daisy.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Sean. I've edited the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incompetent spammer: Jatin Dabas - Professional Profile[^] - he gets the "Click here to learn more" bit, but fails to get his URL in ... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really need solutions like this[^] from users like this[^] ?
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
|
It's tricky to link to QA Answers because when it is gone, your link ends up pointing at the Question, not the Answer, which I believe is this[^] little gem.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are correct sir! That is actually the edited version.
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd add his comment as well: Comments by This Forum Sucks[^] - the first one which starts "oh and" is unneccessary.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
