|
So does sexting make you walk straight?
|
|
|
|
|
Only the guys. 
When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others.
Same thing when you are stupid.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
On Wednesday, June 21, Microsoft hosted the first ever Azure OpenDev virtual event, and I was blown away by the community support and response! The event was only made possible with the amazing support of partners such as Canonical, Red Hat, Docker, Pivotal, and Chef. OpenDev brought to life what’s possible with open source in the cloud based on experiences from our partners, customers, and community members from around the world. "Take me to the clouds above"
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Canonical, Red Hat, Docker, Pivotal, and Chef
Wait. Aren't those all *nix makers or software where Microsoft was an "ok, we'll support them too, I guess" afterthought? And these folks are related to Azure how? "Riding the coattails of others" comes to mind. 
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Computer coders will face more ethical dilemmas as people's trust in technology strengthens, but one expert is shocked that IT students are not being taught to uphold morals. "What is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after."
|
|
|
|
|
Ethics and morals are totally different things. The only similarity they have is that no two people will agree to follow any one set of them.
|
|
|
|
|
Completely agree. Also ethics isn't really something you can "teach" in my opinion. I took a computer ethics course in college and the big takeaway I learned from that class is that ethics is complex. To say it's a "case by case" basis is an understatement as the smallest detail can completely change your ethical perspective of a situation.
|
|
|
|
|
morals are standards that define acceptable behavior
ethics are moral principles that guide or govern a person's behavior
So to say that they are two totally different things is completely incorrect.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
I would say the opposite. Ethics are standards loosely defined by societal or industrial constraints usually interpreted and manipulated by your personal morality. Morals are standards defined by your personal experiences whether they be societal, religious, or other.
Ethics are ever-evolving because they are external in nature. Morals for most people are set in stone because they're personal in nature.
They intertwine but it's very possible for two people to have separate moral values and the same ethical values as well as separate ethical values and the same moral values. The lack of logical implication implies that they are separate entities regardless of whether they affect one another. My 2 cents.
modified 6-Jul-17 14:57pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You basically repeated what I just said, but in a more wordy way. Ethics and morals are intertwined because ethics are informed by morals be they societal or personal.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, I see now what you meant. I misinterpreted where you were going with each term. It's true that our definitions are in the same general ballpark, except your definitions are simplified enough to allow you to state that they are not separate concepts. Leaving out details such as personal vs external and including assumptions such as ethics being moral principles clouds the fact that they are completely separate concepts. My last section touched on that. To restate a different way, ethics do not require or imply morals and morals do not require or imply ethics.
Here's an example: You're a doctor. Your patient is in a vegetative state and has permanently lost higher cognitive functions. You have the ability to keep their body alive for possibly years. You know if you tell the family that fact they will want to keep the body alive. What do you do? Let's say that the family keeping them alive will cost someone else who can make a full recovery their life. What do you do now?
For me, this is a great example of ethics and morals clashing. Ethically, you have a sworn duty to tell the family all available treatments. Morally, I find it repugnant keeping an empty body alive putting strain on the hospital, healthcare system, and taking up an ER bed that could be used for another patient that has a chance at real life. Not to mention it feels disrespectful to the mentally deceased. Ethics are telling me to do one thing while morals another.
In many situations it's true that morals and ethics are nearly synonymous but the devil's in the details. In careers such as police, medical, and military, there are often situations that show just how different and hard-to-combine they can be.
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: To restate a different way, ethics do not require or imply morals and morals do not require or imply ethics.
Seems logical or at least possible. Someone without morals may still choose to follow rules which could be called ethics.
Jon McKee wrote: devil's in the details.
I see, I think, what you mean. You're basically stating that violating an ethical rule may not be immoral given the situation (i.e., the doctor potentially lying to the family of a brain dead patient to save life-giving resources for those who really need it). That sounds like situational ethics or situational morals or at least moral priority ordering. I'm a little more black and white than that. Although, in the given example, I'd be real tempted to lie... tough decision.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
The difference is simple - morals define an individual's own view of what is right and wrong.
Ethics are external - for example medical ethics decide whether an experiment is ethical - and are achieved by consensus.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
But ethics are also informed by morals, be they personal or societal, so they are intertwined.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Is there such a thing as ethical article structure? Because the line breaks between each sentence offend me on a personal level 
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: Because the line breaks between each sentence offend me on a personal level
I couldn't even read it, it so offended my sense of morality. 
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Coders are into geeky tech, not the fact that it can blow up the world, tell hostile aliens where we live, or (closer to home) provide all sorts of information to AI "expert" systems that determine the cost of your health and property insurance based on your life style, credit rating, income, address, age, gender, and for all I know, ethnicity.
Marc
Latest Article - Create a Dockerized Python Fiddle Web App
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps more face-time with their petty-crook program managers, and other felons farther up their company's predator-prey chain ?
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
|
Sounds like this "expert" is feeling a little morally superior and I question the morality of that.
I also fail to see how being modest about your skills has anything to do with being ethical.
Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go to work and wreck some lives today!
|
|
|
|
|
Morals and ethics that matter are taught from childhood by parents and later close peers. How you act shows how embedded those values are.
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at coroutines in other language, JavaScript or Python for example, you'll see that the language documents how the coroutines work. In C++ they're quite different. "Come together, right now, over me"
Sorry, that was the first thing that comes into my head whenever I hear 'coroutines'
|
|
|
|
|
But it does cause a disproportionate amount of damage for the size of the threat. So are tigers, and I don't want one of them in my computer either
|
|
|
|
|
For years, our electronic devices have been getting smaller and faster, but the trend can’t continue until we solve one big obstacle: batteries. Yeah, I saw that movie too. Didn't work out too well for the batteries as I recall.
|
|
|
|
|
Uh, no; we are nothing like batteries at all. At best we are very inefficient generators (converters).
|
|
|
|
|
I refuse to take Lithium, and they can leave my anode alone !
«Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it may be necessary from time to time to give a stupid or misinformed beholder a black eye.» Miss Piggy
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
