|
|
Time to grab the mike 
|
|
|
|
|
Mike Mullikin wrote: Heinrich Himmler, Infamous Nazi (SS / Gestapo)
Vladimir Putin, Russian President
Simon Cowell, British TV Producer
and me.
Coincidence?
It's only a coincidence if you are a psychotic <<insert animal name, perhaps some sunshine for good measure>>
|
|
|
|
|
Slacker007 wrote: It's only a coincidence if you are a psychotic <<insert animal name, perhaps some sunshine for good measure>>
I've been called worse... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the Department of Redundancy Department.
|
|
|
|
|
So what's the problem? Just install Razor first, then you can install Razor and be done with it!
On the other hand, you have different fingers. - Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
I just tried installing GoLang on a Debian system.
Cert wouldn't validate, turned out the date was wrong. And of course the freakin' LXE doesn't have a way to set the date via the UI.
So, sudo set date. Nope, "cliftonm" isn't in the list of soduers.
So, figure out how to edit the sudoer file.
OK, install ran, but after doing the exports, go --version gives me "no command called go"
Go to hell, *unix.
So, that was a brief rabbit hole that led nowhere this morning. Fortunately it was merely a curiosity thing I wanted to try, to see if I could get a friend's project running.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: Go to hell, *unix.
sorry, debian is a linux bundle, not unix, and linux is just a dumbed down amaturish copy of unix/BSD.
(that is: if it were unix you wouldn't have even got that far.)
Format Success.
Welcome to your new signa&*(gD@@@ ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.global.ssl.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) @@@@@@*@x@@
|
|
|
|
|
Lopatir wrote: sorry, debian is a linux bundle, not unix, and linux is just a dumbed down amaturish copy of unix/BSD.
Thanks for the education, I've always wondered what the relationship is, and never took the time to properly understand it. Digging a wee bit, wikipedia says Debian is a "Unix-like" OS and defines "Unix-like" as:
A Unix-like (sometimes referred to as UN*X or *nix) operating system is one that behaves in a manner similar to a Unix system, while not necessarily conforming to or being certified to any version of the Single UNIX Specification. A Unix-like application is one that behaves like the corresponding Unix command or shell. There is no standard for defining the term, and some difference of opinion is possible as to the degree to which a given operating system or application is "Unix-like".
Interesting and confusing. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSD
Format Success.
Welcome to your new signa&*(gD@@@ ![Beer | [beer]](https://codeproject.freetls.fastly.net/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif) @@@@@@*@x@@
|
|
|
|
|
Simple explanation; someone is trying to install an "upgrade version", while there is no previous version of the package installed of the product.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Probably, yes.
But somebody sat there and typed that, thinking "That'll work. That'll explain what the problem is."
And probably went home well pleased with his days work.
Then QA passed it as well...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
More like someone wrote a message containing the version, which according to a meeting from Q&A, Management and Marketing was deemed to complex, after which a new and improved text was added.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
Starting at C# level zero.
Does that exists, or do I have to start from scratch ?
I have a C# application that I need to understand and extract some of the code, but, AFAIK, everything is so tightly coupled with binding and LINQ stuff that I can't wrapped my head around it.
Dead wood or pixel based ...
Thanks in advanced.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
I would try Pluralsight or youtube.
|
|
|
|
|
R. Giskard Reventlov wrote: Pluralsight
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, will look at Pluralsight.
I'd rather be phishing!
|
|
|
|
|
Maximilien wrote: everything is so tightly coupled with binding and LINQ stuff that I can't wrapped my head around it.
Good luck -- my only advice is divide and conquer. Start with something, perhaps the LINQ, and figure out what it does so you understand how the data is being mapped/reduced/filtered. Work your way out, figuring out what each method/property is doing, until you hit the data binding, which is where you can start tying together how the code-behind is interacting with the UI. Along the way, whenever you see something about C# that you don't understand, look it up, which might involve a quick read of how generics and type inference works, which is the basis of LINQ, and some basics of XAML data binding.
[edit]My reason for starting with the code rather than a tutorial is that you will probably encounter specific stuff in the code that no tutorial will decently cover, so the code is, ironically, your best tutorial.[/edit]
|
|
|
|
|
My upvoTe, because ThaT is whaT I did when I sTumbled across LINQ in my projecT, a week inTo my job.
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking.
|
|
|
|
|
WhaT's wiTh the capiTal T's?
|
|
|
|
|
LoL, my keyboard lost its T key, I was using Ctrl+V to write Ts. Didn't bother to copy the appropriate T 
I am not the one who knocks. I never knock.
In fact, I hate knocking.
|
|
|
|
|
Our Microsoft consultant recommended us "C# 5.0 Unleashed" from Bart De Smet. Although it's not the best IT book I've stumbled upon, it covers most of the C# bases and more.
Also In the "Language Integrated Query Essentials" chapter, you will find something about LINQ.
Amazon[^]
There is only one Vera Farmiga and Salma Hayek is her prophet!
Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
|
|
|
|
|
It is very highly ignorance, that higher rep members are welcome with such a post here and not noticed to read first the top of the page or explaining "Google is your friend" 
Nice sh*t
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
