|
Wouldn't guess in my life that sleeping is essential for being... I was thinking it is more for the fun...
It is maybe only me, but the useless/stupid/wasting 'researches' published lately increased their presence...
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Quantum communication is a strange beast, but one of the weirdest proposed forms of it is called counterfactual communication - a type of quantum communication where no particles travel between two recipients. "I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics"
Counterfactual sounds like it might be a great replacement for 'fake news'
|
|
|
|
|
Seems all they did is pretend that light is only a wave.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: it is called counterfactual communication - a type of quantum communication where no particles travel between two recipients.
I am wondering... how will they call it, when two particles travel between no recipients?
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeeze, dude. Put the links in correctly... That's three in a row...
AirPod survives trip through man who swallowed it | Cult of Mac[^]
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 5-May-19 10:56am.
|
|
|
|
|
Having a clickable link in the first place is progress.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xykkkd/why-american-farmers-are-hacking-their-tractors-with-ukrainian-firmware
A license agreement John Deere required farmers to sign in October forbids nearly all repair and modification to farming equipment, and prevents farmers from suing for "crop loss, lost profits, loss of goodwill, loss of use of equipment … arising from the performance or non-performance of any aspect of the software." The agreement applies to anyone who turns the key or otherwise uses a John Deere tractor with embedded software. It means that only John Deere dealerships and "authorized" repair shops can work on newer tractors.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
|
So they've learned well the lessons of the software world.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It is outrageous.
I think time is coming that those companies with "give me your first child" user agreements get a big kick in their balls.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretty sure this idea got tossed a while back, after a little trip to the courts.
|
|
|
|
|
Not via court, but the Copyright office has granted a DMCA exception which allows farmers to hack the software themselves.
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
As the software is now integral part of the equipment - excluding it from the warranty is just evil, and possibly the company can be seized only for forcing such agreement... (it is not my personal opinion but asked my friend, who is a lawyer, of course there are differences between here and there)
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge". Stephen Hawking, 1942- 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/30/youtube-algorithm-changes-negatively-impact-google-ad-revenue.html
YouTube was literally incentivized to keep its algorithms pumping junk to the top of people’s feeds so people would keep watching and the ad dollars would keep flowing. A devastating Bloomberg report
earlier this month showed that for years YouTube executives ignored warnings from their own employees that the misinformation and nastiness on the site had gotten out of hand.
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
Get woke go broke. Heaven forbid you allow an open forum and rake in the cash.
|
|
|
|
|
IMO, it's been completely out of hand for at least the last decade.
David A. Gray
Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time
Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
I respectfully disagree. YouTube provided an open forum and letting people use that for all but clearly illegal things is a good thing in my estimation. One of the greatest things about genuine free speech is that you can hear from even the nuttiest people and make your own judgements. Rather than hear the claims of what a particular person believes, anyone can find out for themselves. Isolating them also means they can't be confronted with a counter argument.
Most importantly, how do we trust the censors? One problem with YouTube, Twitter and Facebook is that a tiny minority--even one person--can block content based on objectively false and/or misleading accusations. This problem is avoided by not bothering with censorship (which doesn't have clear, mostly legal, boundaries.)
|
|
|
|
|
Who watches the Watchmen? 
"When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others; same thing when you are stupid."
Ignorant - An individual without knowledge, but is willing to learn.
Stupid - An individual without knowledge and is incapable of learning.
Idiot - An individual without knowledge and allows social media to do the thinking for them.
modified 19-Nov-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
That's fine, so long as the search algorithm isn't allowed to be subverted to display such content when I am clearly not looking for it. I've seen some very creepy things recommended as "next" for my viewing after I viewed a video of something along the lines of the theme from the old "Rawhide" TV series. That's nothing to do with free speech.
David A. Gray
Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time
Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
Yes and no. Google allows its search algorithm to be gamed which allows someone to silence another person. (I saw this recently with a dietary supplement which appeared to be a scam--whoever was in charge of their search did an excellent job of ensuring that the first hundred or so results were all their scammy positive reviews.)
That said, I have no problem with Google enforcing accuracy with tags, though my biggest complaint is that videos I've already watched show back up again in suggestions. OTOH, sometimes I've gotten off-the-wall suggestions, which have resulted in me subscribing to a new channel.
|
|
|
|
|
One of the major mistakes people make is that they think manners are only the expression of happy ideas. There's a whole range of behavior that can be expressed in a mannerly way. That's what civilization is all about – doing it in a mannerly and not an antagonistic way. One of the places we went wrong was the naturalistic Rousseauean movement of the Sixties in which people said, "Why can't you just say what's on your mind?" In civilization there have to be some restraints. If we followed every impulse,we'd be killing one another. -- Miss Manners (Judith Martin) ... Freedom isn't free,,,
Caveat Emptor.
"Progress doesn't come from early risers – progress is made by lazy men looking for easier ways to do things." Lazarus Long
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
