|
Two days in a row now I got an e-mail about someone replying to one of my messages; the email ends with: "Do not hit 'reply' to this email: To reply, click here."
When I click, I find a "Message currently under review" with content "This message has been flagged as potential spam and is awaiting moderation" and no means to reply. Example[^]
Suggestion:
the addressee, possibly qualified by sufficient reputation points, could be offered a way to (1) lift the moderation status and/or (2) reply anyway.
TIA
|
|
|
|
|
Or maybe the notification message shouldn't be sent until the reply has been approved?
Possibly linked to: Notifications showing too soon | Bugs and Suggestions[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
that would be the preferred action on real spam 
otherwise it is just an unnecessary delay...
does anyone know the recent spam/nospam ratio for the under-review messages?
I don't know how a message gets an "under review" status, however a good approach for early notification could be:
- give all members a spam counter, initially set at say 2;
- for each of his messages that get put under review, send an immediate notification when the spam counter is zero;
- and either increment (by 1) or decrement (by 1) the spam counter appropriately (don't make it negative though) at review time.
modified 18-Jul-19 7:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
Good points.
So
1) we could see if there's an elegant way to add a note: "You have moderator ability. Click here to moderate this message", or
2) only send the notification about a message when the message is actually published. You don't need notifications of spam
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah.
You probably could introduce restricted moderator rights like so:
- assuming a certain level of reputation;
- only applying to messages that are replies to ones own messages.
- rights limited to "accept as non-spam" or "do nothing" (i.e. leave it to a full moderator).
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
A picture is worth a thousand words..... so why can't I add a screenshot to my bug reports?
Thanks,
Merlin
|
|
|
|
|
Well ... did you try pasting one?
Try WINKEY+SHIFT+S, then CTRL+V in the text box.
Do note this ONLY works in Sugs'n'Bugs - the other forums aren't as closely "policed" and some of our users would ... um ... post unsuitable material.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Try WINKEY+SHIFT+S, then CTRL+V in the text box.
Never knew this. Did you skip the "drag a box" step?
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed that anyone bright enough to find S'n'B would assume dragging to mark the area to copy ...
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Dave
Tried that under both Bugs & Sugs.
No Joy 
Does the author have an email addy I can send the JPG to?
Thanks,
Merlin
|
|
|
|
|
Merlin Brasil wrote: Thanks, Dave
No, I'm OriginalGriff. DalekDave is someone who follows my every message, whether he likes it or not.
Merlin Brasil wrote: Tried that under both Bugs & Sugs.
Sorry? That doesn't makes any sense: Sugs'n'bugs is this forum ...
Open a reply to this, copy your image to the clipboard, then paste it while the text cursor is at the appropriate point in the message:
It should save the image, and paste a link into place.
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody else experiencing the lack of the red notifications icon on CP mobile site?
I can see notifications on my desktop, but not on the mobile site.
|
|
|
|
|
I doesn't show on my IPhone in Portrait, but does show in Landscape.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
My historic email address is being retired by my professional institution, so I have just updated my personal settings page to provide my new email.
Unfortunately this appears to mean I've lost  my 'history' and notifications setting (daily newsletter, etc.)
Is this to be expected?
Is there a way to recover those old settings and transfer my 'history' to my account under my new email address.
Philip Oakley
|
|
|
|
|
What do you mean by 'history'? As far as I can tell, your account data is intact.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
if is look at Questions asked / Answers / comments made tabs I get 0/0/0 as the values, which suggested I have no history.
Also I don't appear to have received notifications of daily newsletter that I normally receive, nor notification of your reply/comment (the box is ticked), so I'm not sure what's happening and where the error is (the new email account is receiving test messages I've sent).
Philip
|
|
|
|
|
We don't send Newsletters to unconfirmed email addresses. When you changed your email address, it needed to be confirmed. I have sent you an email confirmation email. Please follow the instructions.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
email (CodeProject | CodeProject Email confirmation) received at new email address and accepted.
I had had a password confirmatory email (to old email address) at '13 Jul 2019 18:49:37 -0400' which I thought was part of the update (as I didn't appear to get a proper log in after the change)
Keep up the good work.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
As for the Questions/Answers/Comments == 0/0/0,
It appears that you have only used the Forums, not the Questions & Answers Feature.
Questions/Answers/Comments only are part of the Q&A Feature.
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, Thanks, that clarifies my misunderstanding - too much reading/following, not enough Q&A 
|
|
|
|
|
There re way too many images posted in articles that are too large. If someone includes an image in an article
0) Scale it down to a max appropriate size (mobile aware etc). Do this only if the image is larger than the max appropriate size.
1) Allow the user to click on the image to see the full-size image.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
modified 15-Jul-19 8:51am.
|
|
|
|
|
The scale-down-and-click is exactly what's meant to happen with large images. Is there an article you can point to that's causing problems?
The current solution is simply to use JavaScript to do the scaling and provide a clickable full-sized version. I'm going to update this so that the images displayed are < 700px (and optimised) and a separate, full sized unoptimised image available through click through - no JavaScript.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I think scaling down to 320 (or 480) would be best (especially if they can click to see the unscaled image).
Since the images are already stored (in the db?) I think just loading them and scaling on the fly would be less work, and take less disk space.
I wasn't aware that this kind of thing was implemented. I just thought the people posting images just didn't care.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
There's actually two levels in play:
1. Anything > 700px gets scaled down via Javascript.
2. Anything wide than the viewport will be scaled down due to a max-width rule
I'm not keen on needlessly shrinking images. A large image should be able to fill the width of the article (up to a point) in order to fill the space and provide those whose eyesight is failing (ahem) a chance to see things a little better.
Is there any article you have seen where the images appear to be too large?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I'm not keen on needlessly shrinking images.
I'm not talking about scaling images that fit.
I figure since you already have the image at its original size, you could just use the div tag to scale (instead of using javascript)
Most articles Ive seen appear to have the images scaled UP to fit the viewport, which makes the image look like crap. I can't give you a specific example.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
